Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions of Patients With Stroke.

7 de septiembre de 2017 actualizado por: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions of Patients With Stroke: An Evidence of Clinical and Kinematic Studies.

The fundamental goals of early rehabilitation for patients with stroke are: optimizing motor function within each patient's prognostic potential, preventing the development of secondary conditions that impact life-long health, and promoting patient's participation in their lives. In addition to employ clinical measures after treatment, usual outcome measures employed in the intervention studies included movement kinematics (spatio-temporal characteristics of movements). Recent reports have suggested repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and BoNTA (BoNTA) improved motor function in patients with stroke. A novel rTMS paradigm, theta burst stimulation (TBS), including intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS), that modulates human cortical excitability differently. However, there is lack of literatures in verifying the treatment effect by the integration of clinical and kinematic analysis. Until now, there are no conclusive results regarding optimal rTMS protocol, such as stimulating pattern and for patients with stroke. Additionally, few studies investigate the possible clinical characteristics of patients with stroke that may influence the effects of various treatment protocols proposed in this project.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

The research program aims at studying patients with stroke the immediate and maintaining effects of new upper-extremity (UE) treatment protocols after brain damage and identifying the possible mechanisms underlying treatment-induced changes in patients with stroke. This research will study new treatment approaches that have been formulated based on principles of integrated central modulation (rTMS) and peripheral modification techniques (BoNTA).

  1. To compare the movement functions and motor control in patients with stroke of different motor severities.
  2. To investigate the immediate and maintaining effects of different protocols in the treatment of upper limb functions.
  3. To evaluate motor control and clinical outcomes after different treatment approaches applied in the UE training of patients with stroke. The treatment approaches to be studied will include different protocols. We hypothesize that there will be improvements in movement performance after the treatment and the level of post-treatment performance will differ among the treatments through different reorganization patterns.

    3.1 To compare the motor control and clinical outcomes after different treatment approaches.

    3.2 To identify the optimal treatment protocol for patients with stroke.

  4. To investigate the possible predictors of treatment outcome associated with motor severity, movement and participation for each type of treatments. The possible predictors will include brain lesions, and severity. We hypothesize that the proposed prognostic factors will predict treatment outcomes.
  5. To analyze the association between motor reorganization measured by kinematic study and behavioral improvement in motor severity, movement and participation measured by clinical tools.

Treating motor dysfunction in patients with stroke requires an understanding of the mechanism underlying motor control. Recent reports have suggested BoNTA and rTMS improved motor function in patients with various disorders. However, there are few researches in identifying the optimal rTMS protocol in the treatment of upper limb dysfunctions in patients with stroke. There is lack of literatures in verifying the treatment effect by movement control studies. The current research will offer valuable kinematic data that support neural-motor models proposed to account for motor control problems in these patients. More important, we will identify the new protocol in the treatment of upper limb dysfunctions in patients with stroke through integration of clinical and kinematic measures. We will identify clinical predictors influencing the outcome for different treatment approaches, and analyze the association between motor control and clinical measures involving motor severity, movement and participation. We believe the results of this study will refine services and supports for patients with stroke to meet these goals. This study may potentially provide directions in kinematic measures for future studies on patients with stroke.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

80

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Taoyuan, Taiwán, 333
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

20 años a 80 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 20-80 y/o
  • patients with 1st onset cerebral stroke.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Brain stem or cerebellar stroke
  • Contraindication to MRI, such as metallic implant
  • Contraindication to BoNTA, such as poor controlled epilepsy
  • History of psychiatric disease
  • Received BoNTA injection or surgery in recent six months
  • Severe psychological impairments, such as mental retardation, autism, or severe Communication problems
  • Progressive disorders, such as neurodegenerative disease
  • Active medical disease, such as infection

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: grupo iTBS
En estimulación intermitente theta burst (grupo iTBS), recibieron iTBS (80% del umbral motor activo) en el hemisferio afectado.
In intermittent theta burst stimulation pattern (iTBS) will intermittently give a 2 s train of TBS every 10s for a total of 20 times (low pulse: 600 pulses in total)
Experimental: grupo cTBS
En estimulación theta burst continua (grupo cTBS), recibieron cTBS (80 % del umbral motor activo) en el hemisferio no afectado.
In continuous burst stimulation pattern (cTBS) will intermittently give a cTBS treatment consists of a continuous train of TBS for 40 seconds(low pulse: 600 pulses in total).
Otros nombres:
  • continuous burst stimulation
Comparador falso: grupo falso TBS
En la estimulación de explosión theta simulada (grupo TBS simulado), recibieron estimulación TBS simulada.
In sham burst stimulation pattern (sham TBS) will intermittently give a sham TBS treatment consists of a continuous train of TBS for 40 seconds(almost no pulse: 600 pulses in total).

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change from baseline of Kinematic analysis after 2 weeks treatment and 3 months , 12 months follow up.
Periodo de tiempo: baseline, after treatment, 3 months , 6 months
Kinematic analysis for upper limb analysis.
baseline, after treatment, 3 months , 6 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de diciembre de 2012

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de junio de 2017

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de junio de 2017

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

18 de septiembre de 2013

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

18 de septiembre de 2013

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

20 de septiembre de 2013

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de septiembre de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

7 de septiembre de 2017

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir