- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT01947413
New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions of Patients With Stroke.
New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions of Patients With Stroke: An Evidence of Clinical and Kinematic Studies.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
The research program aims at studying patients with stroke the immediate and maintaining effects of new upper-extremity (UE) treatment protocols after brain damage and identifying the possible mechanisms underlying treatment-induced changes in patients with stroke. This research will study new treatment approaches that have been formulated based on principles of integrated central modulation (rTMS) and peripheral modification techniques (BoNTA).
- To compare the movement functions and motor control in patients with stroke of different motor severities.
- To investigate the immediate and maintaining effects of different protocols in the treatment of upper limb functions.
To evaluate motor control and clinical outcomes after different treatment approaches applied in the UE training of patients with stroke. The treatment approaches to be studied will include different protocols. We hypothesize that there will be improvements in movement performance after the treatment and the level of post-treatment performance will differ among the treatments through different reorganization patterns.
3.1 To compare the motor control and clinical outcomes after different treatment approaches.
3.2 To identify the optimal treatment protocol for patients with stroke.
- To investigate the possible predictors of treatment outcome associated with motor severity, movement and participation for each type of treatments. The possible predictors will include brain lesions, and severity. We hypothesize that the proposed prognostic factors will predict treatment outcomes.
- To analyze the association between motor reorganization measured by kinematic study and behavioral improvement in motor severity, movement and participation measured by clinical tools.
Treating motor dysfunction in patients with stroke requires an understanding of the mechanism underlying motor control. Recent reports have suggested BoNTA and rTMS improved motor function in patients with various disorders. However, there are few researches in identifying the optimal rTMS protocol in the treatment of upper limb dysfunctions in patients with stroke. There is lack of literatures in verifying the treatment effect by movement control studies. The current research will offer valuable kinematic data that support neural-motor models proposed to account for motor control problems in these patients. More important, we will identify the new protocol in the treatment of upper limb dysfunctions in patients with stroke through integration of clinical and kinematic measures. We will identify clinical predictors influencing the outcome for different treatment approaches, and analyze the association between motor control and clinical measures involving motor severity, movement and participation. We believe the results of this study will refine services and supports for patients with stroke to meet these goals. This study may potentially provide directions in kinematic measures for future studies on patients with stroke.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Taoyuan, Taiwán, 333
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: 20-80 y/o
- patients with 1st onset cerebral stroke.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Brain stem or cerebellar stroke
- Contraindication to MRI, such as metallic implant
- Contraindication to BoNTA, such as poor controlled epilepsy
- History of psychiatric disease
- Received BoNTA injection or surgery in recent six months
- Severe psychological impairments, such as mental retardation, autism, or severe Communication problems
- Progressive disorders, such as neurodegenerative disease
- Active medical disease, such as infection
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: grupo iTBS
En estimulación intermitente theta burst (grupo iTBS), recibieron iTBS (80% del umbral motor activo) en el hemisferio afectado.
|
In intermittent theta burst stimulation pattern (iTBS) will intermittently give a 2 s train of TBS every 10s for a total of 20 times (low pulse: 600 pulses in total)
|
|
Experimental: grupo cTBS
En estimulación theta burst continua (grupo cTBS), recibieron cTBS (80 % del umbral motor activo) en el hemisferio no afectado.
|
In continuous burst stimulation pattern (cTBS) will intermittently give a cTBS treatment consists of a continuous train of TBS for 40 seconds(low pulse: 600 pulses in total).
Otros nombres:
|
|
Comparador falso: grupo falso TBS
En la estimulación de explosión theta simulada (grupo TBS simulado), recibieron estimulación TBS simulada.
|
In sham burst stimulation pattern (sham TBS) will intermittently give a sham TBS treatment consists of a continuous train of TBS for 40 seconds(almost no pulse: 600 pulses in total).
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline of Kinematic analysis after 2 weeks treatment and 3 months , 12 months follow up.
Periodo de tiempo: baseline, after treatment, 3 months , 6 months
|
Kinematic analysis for upper limb analysis.
|
baseline, after treatment, 3 months , 6 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 100-0012A3
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .