Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

the Objective of This Research is to Compare the Clinical Effectiveness of the Conventional Lingual Arch Space Maintainers With Three-dimensional Printed Space Maintainers.

12. maj 2026 opdateret af: Reham Mohamed, Suez Canal University

Comparative Evaluation of the Conventional and Three-Dimensional Printed Lower Lingual Arch Space Maintainers A Randomized Clinical Trial

the objective of this research is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the conventional lingual arch space maintainers with three-dimensional printed space maintainers.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Introduction and Review of literature Primary teeth serve to preserve inborn space until permanent teeth erupt, in addition they help with speech and mastication. It is appropriate to highlight the primary dentition's function as the best space maintainer for permanent teeth. It is possible that premature primary tooth loss will cause undesirable primary and permanent tooth movements, including a loss in arch length. If there is not enough arch length, it is more likely to predict malocclusions such as crowding and ectopic eruption as well as tooth impaction.

Since the largest space loss occurs within a month of losing the deciduous teeth, it is best to use a space maintainer as soon as possible after early tooth loss. Space maintainers are the orthodontic appliance of choice for preventing space loss because they preserve space within the oral cavity.

Conventional space maintainers have significant drawbacks despite their clinical effectiveness. These include the need for patient compliance, extended chairside times, multiple steps in the fabrication process, technique-sensitive impressions and lab procedures, solder failure, and caries formation at band margins.

These disadvantages in the conventional space maintainer recommend the need for more advanced appliance designs and materials, one of which is three-dimensional (3D) printing, The process involves creating 3D objects using a digitally scanned and layered design of the entire object. The design is preserved using a "Standard Tessellation Language" (STL) file.

So, the objective of this research is to compare the clinical effectiveness of the conventional lingual arch space maintainers with three-dimensional printed space maintainers.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

44

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

    • Ismailia Governorate
      • Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, Egypten, 41522
        • Rekruttering
        • Suez Canal University
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
          • Rim M. Co-investigator, Lecturer

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Apparently, healthy cooperative children have recently prematurely loss of more than one mandibular primary molar in any of the quadrants, full erupted mandibular first permanent molars in both sides, and whose lower permanent incisors have erupted
  • The permanent successors of the lost primary molars were not expected to erupt within 6 months
  • Angle's class 1 occlusion with normal primary molar relation
  • Caries-free and periodontally healthy abutment teeth
  • Absence of parafunctional habits or abnormal occlusion conditions such as crossbite, open bite, or deep bite.
  • Children's age ranges from 7 to 9 years-old
  • Radiographically, presence of permanent successors, more than one millimeter of bone covering the successor tooth germ, and/or only about one-third of the root of the permanent tooth has been formed.
  • Parents and children were accepting the new treatment modality.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children exhibited poor oral hygiene, para-functional oral habits, severe crowding, space loss, and abnormal occlusion
  • Extraction of primary molars exceeding three months.
  • Radiographically, absence of permanent successor.
  • uncooperative children

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Group I
Conventional spacemaintainer
Two bands will be selected and checked for fit and adaptation around the distal abutment teeth, then an alginate impression will be taken and will be sent to the laboratory for fabrication
Eksperimentel: Group II
3D printed spacemaintainer
An intraoral scan for the patients' lower arch will be taken using a 3D digital dental scanner.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Patient satisfaction and pain experienced using the Wong-Baker Faces Test
Tidsramme: 9 months
Patient satisfaction and pain experienced during conventional and digital impression and cementation will be evaluated using the Wong-Baker Faces test and subsequently recorded for clinical satisfaction at 3 months, 6 months and 9 months for both patient groups to evaluate appliance acceptance and convenience for the patients.
9 months
Gingival health will be evaluated using Sillness and Loe Gingival Index
Tidsramme: 9 months

gingival health will be evaluated by Sillness and Loe Gingival Index

Evaluation of the gingival health according to the (GI) described by (Loe and Silness, 1963):

Score Criteria for the Gingival Index 0 No inflammation.

  1. Mild inflammation: slight redness, slight edema, no bleeding on probing.
  2. Moderate inflammation: redness, edema, glazing, bleeding on probing.
  3. Severe inflammation: marked redness and edema, ulceration, and a tendency of spontaneous bleeding.
9 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Impression taking experience for the patient assessed by 6-questions survey
Tidsramme: Day 1

Questions Answer by Yes (√) or (No) ×

  1. Was the impression easy?
  2. Did you feel nausea during impression taking?
  3. Any malaise during impression taking ( bad taste,odour, foreign body)?
  4. Did impression take short time?
  5. Would you repeat this impression experience again?
  6. Did you feel any stress during impression taking?
Day 1

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

22. januar 2025

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. august 2026

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. september 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

21. december 2025

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

12. maj 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

15. maj 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

15. maj 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

12. maj 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. december 2025

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 930/2024
  • Organization's Unique Protocol (930/2024)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

IPD-planbeskrivelse

may be after publishing

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner