Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Development and Application of a Clinical Decision Support System for Exercise Rehabilitation in Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

28. maj 2026 opdateret af: Jiawei Jiang
This study aims to develop a clinical decision support system for exercise rehabilitation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, based on evidence-based recommendations for postoperative exercise rehabilitation. The system is designed to provide individualized assessment and exercise interventions, monitor exercise behaviors, and deliver risk alerts, thereby promoting safe and standardized postoperative exercise training in OVCF patients. The ultimate objectives are to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the system in increasing physical exercise participation, reducing sedentary time, and facilitating postoperative rehabilitation, without increasing fatigue or pain.

Studieoversigt

Status

Rekruttering

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

60

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Studiesteder

  • Kina
    • Jiangsu
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, Kina
        • Rekruttering
        • Affiliated 2 Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 0513
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Hongqing Xu, Dr
        • Kontakt:

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 18 and 55 years
  • diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation requiring single-level lumbar fusion surgery - no previous history of lumbar surgery
  • Surgical procedures performed by the same surgical team
  • willingness to comply with the study protocol and restrictions
  • availability of a home WiFi connection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lumbar surgery secondary to neoplasm, tuberculosis, infection, or inflammation
  • postoperative infection or revision surgery
  • presence of cauda equina syndrome
  • diagnosis of schizophrenia, cognitive impairment, or other psychiatric disorders
  • coexisting severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, or congenital conditions precluding exercise participation.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Ikke-randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Kontrolgruppen
Kontrolgruppen modtog konventionelle postoperative plejeinterventioner
Adfærdsmæssigt: Grundlæggende postoperativ pleje
Alle deltagere blev bedt om at opretholde deres sædvanlige daglige aktiviteter og afholde sig fra yderligere behandlinger i hele 6-måneders undersøgelsesperiode.
Adfærdsmæssigt: Conventional Postoperative Care
Before discharge, patients received exercise rehabilitation training guidance from orthopedic specialist nurses and rehabilitation therapists and were given a rehabilitation training manual. They were instructed to scan the QR code in the manual to watch exercise training videos. The manual contained information including the goals, methods, frequency, intensity, and precautions of the exercise training.
Eksperimentel: The intervention group
The experimental group received individualized assessment and exercise rehabilitation intervention through the clinical decision support system for exercise rehabilitation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Adfærdsmæssigt: Grundlæggende postoperativ pleje
Alle deltagere blev bedt om at opretholde deres sædvanlige daglige aktiviteter og afholde sig fra yderligere behandlinger i hele 6-måneders undersøgelsesperiode.
Adfærdsmæssigt: Decision Support System: A clinical decision support system for exercise rehabilitation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
The experimental group first developed the functional modules of the OVCF exercise rehabilitation decision support system. Researchers were trained on participant selection, module use, and task allocation. Participants received operation demonstrations and a QR code for video guidance, then registered accounts and entered data. The system auto-captured baseline indicators, generated individualized exercise prescriptions, and pushed them for staff approval. Before and after each exercise session, patients completed vital signs, pain, and fatigue assessments; the system analyzed these data, generated decision support, and recommended next steps for therapist review. Data management included visualization, click tracking, and identification of low compliance, triggering individual online support. A user group facilitated communication. At follow-ups, osteoporosis clinic staff reviewed personal information and adjusted prescriptions based on exercise experience and outcomes.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
IPAQ-L Scores
Tidsramme: The IPAQ-L scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
Physical activity levels were assessed using the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long (IPAQ-L) adapted by Qu Ningning et al. The questionnaire comprises 27 items across six domains: work, transportation, domestic activities, exercise and recreation, sitting time, and sleep time. Each domain includes physical activities at high, moderate, and low intensities. Based on the number of days and accumulated time per day of activity in the past week, weekly physical activity energy expenditure was calculated and expressed in metabolic equivalents (METs). The test-retest reliability (r=0.927) and criterion validity (r=0.821) of this questionnaire are higher than or equal to those of comparable instruments.
The IPAQ-L scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
RPE Score
Tidsramme: The RPE scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
Fatigue was assessed using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) , a subjective tool for evaluating exercise intensity developed by Swedish psychologist Gunnar Borg, designed to quantify an individual's perception of physical exertion during exercise. On the scale, 6 represents no exertion at all; 7-8 indicates extremely light exertion (e.g.sitting quietly); 9-10, very light; 11-12, light exertion; 13-14, moderate exertion; 15-16, heavy exertion; 17-18, very heavy exertion; and 19-20, extremely exhausting, approaching maximal exertion.
The RPE scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
NRS Score
Tidsramme: The NRS scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), with a total score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain, 1-3 indicates mild pain, 4-6 indicates moderate pain, 7-9 indicates severe pain, and 10 indicates excruciating pain.
The NRS scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
SUS Score
Tidsramme: The SUS scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
Usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) [15-16], which consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 representing "strongly disagree" and 5 representing "strongly agree." For odd-numbered items, the item score is the response score minus 1; for even-numbered items, the item score is 5 minus the response score. If an item is left blank, it is assigned a score of 3. The sum of the 10 item scores is multiplied by 2.5 to yield the final SUS score, which ranges from 0 to 100. A score above 60 indicates acceptable usability, ≥70 indicates good usability, ≥80 indicates very good usability, and ≥90 indicates excellent usability. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.91.
The SUS scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Jiawei Jiang

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. januar 2024

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. januar 2028

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. juni 2028

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

28. maj 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

28. maj 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

3. juni 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

3. juni 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

28. maj 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. maj 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • HGao

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Clinical Decision Support System

Kliniske forsøg med Grundlæggende postoperativ pleje

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Egypt

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

Abonner