Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Central Venous vs Arterial Blood Gas and CO2 Gap in Critically Ill Patients With and Without Diabetes

30. august 2026 opdateret af: Mahmoud Mohamed Ali Abdelhafez, Assiut University

Correlation Between Central Venous and Arterial Blood Gas Parameters Including CO2 Gap in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Critically Ill Patients

Frequent monitoring of acid-base status, ventilation, and tissue oxygenation is essential for managing critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). While arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is considered the standard method for these evaluations, maintaining arterial catheters carries risks of complications, such as thrombosis, hematoma, and infection. Central venous blood gas (CVBG) analysis offers a safer alternative because central venous catheters are already routinely placed for patient care. Additionally, the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (CO2 gap) serves as an indicator of systemic blood flow and tissue perfusion.

However, patients with diabetes mellitus often present with underlying microvascular alterations, endothelial changes, and metabolic variations that might alter tissue perfusion and peripheral gas exchange. This study aims to assess the correlation and agreement between central venous and arterial blood gas parameters, as well as evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the CO2 gap, in diabetic versus non-diabetic critically ill patients.

A total of 100 adult ICU patients (50 diabetic and 50 non-diabetic) with pre-existing central venous and arterial lines will be enrolled. Paired blood samples will be drawn simultaneously to compare blood gas values and calculate the CO2 gap without altering standard clinical treatment.

Studieoversigt

Status

Ikke rekrutterer endnu

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

100

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

N/A

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Adult critically ill patients (both diabetic and non-diabetic) admitted to the Critical Care Unit of the Internal Medicine Department at Assiut University Hospital who have standard clinical indications for indwelling central venous catheters and arterial lines.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 18 years and older
  • Critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)
  • Patients with indwelling central venous catheter and arterial line placed for routine clinical management
  • Written informed consent obtained from the patient or legal next of kin

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known severe peripheral vascular occlusive disease affecting line placement
  • Use of a pulmonary artery catheter (mixed venous blood line) instead of a standard central venous catheter positioned at the superior/inferior vena cava junction
  • Refusal of the patient or legal representative to participate in the study
  • Patients younger than 18 years of age

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Diabetic Critically Ill Patients
Critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit who have a confirmed diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. All participants undergo simultaneous paired arterial and central venous blood gas sampling to evaluate agreement and CO2 gap dynamics.
Non-Diabetic Critically Ill Patients
Critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit without a history or diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. All participants undergo simultaneous paired arterial and central venous blood gas sampling to evaluate agreement and CO2 gap dynamics.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Venous-to-Arterial Carbon Dioxide Tension Difference (Delta PCO2)
Tidsramme: Baseline
Delta PCO2 (CO2 gap) is calculated as central venous PCO2 minus arterial PCO2 (PvCO2 - PaCO2) measured in mmHg. Paired arterial and central venous blood gas samples are collected simultaneously and analyzed within 10 minutes.
Baseline

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Anslået)

1. oktober 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. oktober 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. november 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

30. august 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

30. august 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

2. september 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

2. september 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

30. august 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. august 2026

Mere information

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner