Transvaginal NOTES Cholecystectomy: Phase I/II Mexico Clinical Trial
Transvaginal Natural Orifice Translumenal and Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) Cholecystectomy vs. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Phase I/II Clinical Trial
Cholecystectomy is one of the most common general surgery procedures performed in the US today and is among top 10 procedures performed in U.S. hospitals annually, and biliary tract disease has been estimated to cost U.S. healthcare $5 billion/year. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced in the early 1990s and has become the standard surgical approach for the treatment of gallbladder disease. More than 500,000 cholecystectomy procedures are performed in the US every year. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now performed as an outpatient basis and is related to a very low complication rate. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy requires the use of multiple trocar incisions.
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery(NOTES) is a new type of surgical procedure currently being studied around the world. The idea of NOTES was developed several years ago in response to the concepts that patients would
- realize the benefits of less invasive surgery by reducing the recovery time,
- experience less physical discomfort associated with traditional procedures
- have virtually no visible scarring following this type of surgery.
All of these advantages have spurred research and investigation forward, encouraging physicians and researchers to develop new equipment and techniques to use during NOTES procedures. Although the Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery approach may hold tremendous potential, there are many issues that need to be addressed before this technique is introduced into clinical care.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, feasibility and short-term clinical outcomes (Phase I trial) of transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy in female patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and compare it to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Phase II).
Hypothesis 1: Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in female patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis.
Hypothesis 2: The short term outcomes of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy are comparable to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in female patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis.
Aim 1: Determine the safety of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. Aim 2: Determine the feasibility of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. Aim 3: Determine the short-term outcomes of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. Aim 4: Compare the short-term outcomes of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy to Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Voraussichtlich)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
-
Durango, Mexiko, 34000
- Universidad Juarez del Estado de Durango, Mexico
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult (> 18 years old) female patients residents of Durango Mexico.
- Patients who undergo elective surgery.
- Patients with ultrasound documented symptomatic cholelithiasis, gallbladder polyps of biliary dyskinesia.
- Patients capable of giving written informed consent for the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have contraindications prohibiting general anesthesia.
- Pregnancy.
- Previous abdominal or gynecological procedures.
- Uncontrollable medical or psychiatric conditions
- Elderly > 65 y/o.
- Body Mass Index > 35 mg/kg2.
- Complicated or acute cholecystitis.
- Elevation of liver function tests.
- Acute abdomen.
- Intra-abdominal abscess.
- Coagulopathy.
- Imperforated hymen.
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Transvaginal NOTES Cholecystectomy (Phase 1)
|
Under general anesthesia, patients will undergo Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy
Andere Namen:
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: 2
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Phase 2)
|
Under general anesthesia, patients will undergo standard Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Andere Namen:
|
|
Experimental: 3
Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy (Phase 2)
|
Under general anesthesia, patients will undergo Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy
Andere Namen:
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|
|
Safety and Efficacy of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy when compared to Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|
|
Short term outcomes of Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy when compared to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Mitarbeiter
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Homero Rivas, MD, Hospital de La Paz
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 05626
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .