Controlling Hypertension Outcomes by Improved Communication & Engagement (CHOICE)
26. Juni 2017 aktualisiert von: VA Office of Research and Development
Controlling Hypertension Outcomes by Improved Communication & Engagement (CHOICE)
This randomized control study tested the feasibility of two communication enhancement interventions: one with veterans who had a stroke and demonstrated poorly controlled hypertension; the other with VA primary care providers who provided routine outpatient medical care to these veterans.
This study intervened with both members of the provider-patient dyad in an attempt to improve the self-management of hypertension by improving communication during visits to the VA outpatient clinic, specifically by enabling veterans to communicate their questions and concerns about chronic disease self-management to their providers more effectively, and to help providers improve their ability to communicate more effectively with this population of veterans.
Studienübersicht
Status
Abgeschlossen
Bedingungen
Detaillierte Beschreibung
The communication intervention had two goals; (a) coaching to enhance veteran's abilities to communicate their questions and concerns about self-management for hypertension to their physician; and (b) improving provider's communication skills for enhancing and encouraging self-management of hypertension.
A health educator met with each participating veteran in the intervention arm prior to the 2nd visit to develop a plan for enhancing communication about self-management of hypertension.
The PI provided the Four Habits communication training to the 5 primary care providers in the intervention arm. Two clinic visits between each participating provider-patient pair were videotaped and coded.
This project had a goal of enrolling 10 VA primary care providers to participate in the randomized control trial and 30 veterans (3 veterans from the panel of each of the 10 participating providers) who had a stroke and now demonstrated poorly controlled hypertension. The study evaluated the difference between the two groups, and compared the content of the provider-patient conversations around hypertension management.
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
26
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienorte
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, Vereinigte Staaten, 46202-2884
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, Vereinigte Staaten, 46202-2884
- Richard Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
18 Jahre bis 99 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Alle
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
Veteran:
- Veteran is a patient of the enrolled provider
- History of prior stroke
- Poorly controlled hypertension with at least one measurement >140/90 mm Hg in the past 12 months
- Complete a 6-item screen for cognitive and language impairment with a score of 3 or higher
- Sign the VA Media consent for use of picture and/or voice
Provider:
- Primary care provider, Medicine Service
- Sign VA media consent for use of picture and/or voice
Exclusion Criteria:
- Life expectancy is less than 6 months
- Non-English language patients
- Inability to provide informed consent
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1: Intervention-Veterans
Veterans enrolled in the "Intervention-Veterans" arm received a copy of the NIA guide for "Talking with Your Doctor" [Informational Guide for Patients].
Just prior to their next scheduled visit an educator met with each Veteran in the intervention arm individually for 20-30 minutes to review the material in the pamphlet and develop a plan for enhancing communication about self-management of hypertension with their doctor [Educational Coaching].
To facilitate communication change, the educator assisted the patient in setting a goal to achieve during their visit.
The educator also provided telephone follow-up within 24 hours to review satisfaction and effectiveness of the visit and assess barriers and facilitators to communicating about self-management.
|
Veterans received a copy of the NIA guide for "Talking with Your Doctor".
This pamphlet was specifically developed for this purpose (updated in 2002).
It has pictorials and is written at an 8th grade level.
an educator met with each Veteran in the intervention arm individually for 20-30 minutes to review the material in the pamphlet and develop a plan for enhancing communication about self-management of hypertension with their doctor [Coaching].
To facilitate communication change, the educator assisted the patient in setting a goal to achieve during their visit.
The educator also provided telephone follow-up within 24 hours to review satisfaction and effectiveness of the visit and assess barriers and facilitators to communicating about self-management.
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Arm 2: Control-Veterans
Veterans enrolled in the "Control-Veterans" arm received a copy of the NIA guide for "Talking with Your Doctor" [Informational Guide for Patients].
This pamphlet was specifically developed for this purpose (updated in 2002).
It has pictorials and is written at an 8th grade level.
|
Veterans received a copy of the NIA guide for "Talking with Your Doctor".
This pamphlet was specifically developed for this purpose (updated in 2002).
It has pictorials and is written at an 8th grade level.
|
|
Experimental: Arm 3: Intervention-Physicians
Primary care providers randomly assigned to the "Intervention-Physicians" arm of this study received a copy of the Four Habits of Highly Effective Physicians [Monograph for Physicians].
The Four Habits provided practical evidence-based advice for improving patient-physician communication.
Second, physicians participated in an audiotaped intensive 30 minute, one-on-one educational intervention with PI Frankel after their first set of visits from their three participating patients [Video-Assisted Coaching], but before seeing them for follow-ups.
The main goal of this meeting was to review and discuss the analysis of the physician's videotaped visits using the Four Habits framework, with a particular focus on improving communication about self-management.
|
Physicians participated in an audiotaped intensive 30 minute, one-on-one educational intervention with PI Frankel after their first set of visits from their three participating patients, but before seeing them for follow-ups.
The main goal of this video-assisted coaching session was to review and discuss the analysis of the physician's videotaped visits using the Four Habits framework, with a particular focus on improving communication about self-management.
Primary care providers randomly assigned to the "Intervention-Physicians" arm of this study received a copy of the Four Habits of Highly Effective Physicians.
The Four Habits provided practical evidence-based advice for improving patient-physician communication.
|
|
Aktiver Komparator: Arm 4: Control-Physicians
Primary care providers randomly assigned to the "Control-Physicians" arm of the study did not receive coaching or additional resources, and conducted their primary care practice as usual [Control].
|
The primary care providers randomly assigned to the "Control-Physicians" arm did not receive any additional coaching or resources and conducted their practice as usual.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Activation Measure
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
Veteran self-management of hypertension measured via the 13-item, (0-100 point range), Patient Activation Measure (PAM).
Administered at baseline (1st visit) and after each additional follow-up visit during the next 12-months (+2 max).
Rasch conversion changed raw scores to the PAM interval measure.
Reported outcome is difference in mean PAM scores at baseline and during 12-month follow-up.
If a participant had two PAM scores during the follow-up period, the average of the two was taken to calculate a combined follow-up score.
Higher PAM scores represent higher levels of self-activation.
Research on the PAM measure indicates that each point increase in PAM score correlates to a 2% decrease in hospitalization and a 2% increase in medication adherence.
Ranges for Baseline PAM scores: Intervention = 46.1 (min) to 84.3 (max); Control = 43.2
(min) to 77 (max).
Ranges for Follow-up PAM scores: Intervention = 48.4
(min) to 100 (max); Control = 45.1 (min) to 80.1 (max).
|
12 months
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Richard M. Frankel, PhD, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
1. September 2009
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
30. September 2012
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
30. Januar 2017
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
28. Mai 2010
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
1. Juni 2010
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
2. Juni 2010
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
1. August 2017
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
26. Juni 2017
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. Juni 2017
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- RRP 09-190
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
NEIN
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Nein
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Informational Guide for Patients
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteEMD Serono; National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkRekrutierungBlasenkrebs | Urothelkarzinom | Metastasierter Blasenkrebs | Nicht resezierbares BlasenkarzinomVereinigte Staaten
-
Washington University School of MedicineAbgeschlossenBrustkrebs | Neoplasien der Brust | Brustkrebs | Krebs der BrustVereinigte Staaten
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteKite, A Gilead CompanyAbgeschlossenDiffuses großzelliges B-Zell-Lymphom | Transformiertes LymphomVereinigte Staaten