Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Evaluierung eines umfassenden Schulgesundheitsprogramms in Sambia

25. August 2026 aktualisiert von: London School of Economics and Political Science

Evaluierung eines umfassenden Schulgesundheitsprogramms in Sambia: eine Cluster-randomisierte kontrollierte Studie

In Sambia wird die Gesundheit und das Wohlbefinden von Kindern im Alter von 5 bis 14 Jahren oft vernachlässigt, was zu verschiedenen gesundheitlichen Problemen führt, die sich auf ihre Entwicklung und Bildung auswirken. Das Programm „Healthy Learners“ (HL) zielt in Zusammenarbeit mit der sambischen Regierung darauf ab, diese Lücke durch die Umsetzung eines umfassenden Schulgesundheitsprogramms zu schließen. Ausgebildete Lehrer, sogenannte Schulgesundheitshelfer (SHWs), spielen eine Schlüsselrolle bei der Bereitstellung von Gesundheitserziehung, der Koordinierung der Vorsorge mit örtlichen Kliniken und der Leitung eines „Schulgesundheitsraums“ für kranke Schüler.

Bei dieser Studie handelt es sich um eine große Cluster-randomisierte Kontrollstudie an 225 Schulen. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, die Auswirkungen des von HL entwickelten umfassenden Schulgesundheitsprogramms (SHP) mit zwei Alternativen zu vergleichen: dem aktuellen Niveau der Schulgesundheitsversorgung und den aktuellen Schulgesundheitsaktivitäten, die durch Entwurmung und Vitamin-A-Koordination durch HL verbessert werden Ihre technische und finanzielle Unterstützung gewährleistet die zuverlässige Durchführung aller derzeit von der Regierung geplanten Gesundheitsaktivitäten.

  1. Welche Auswirkungen hat das Programm auf Gesundheitssuche, Gesundheit und Bildungsergebnisse?
  2. Welche indirekten Auswirkungen hat das Programm auf Lehrkräfte und Kliniken?
  3. Was ist der Mehrwert eines solchen umfassenden SHP im Vergleich zur (i) optimierten (ii) oder unvollständigen (Status-quo) Bereitstellung einer begrenzten Auswahl an schulischen Gesundheitsaktivitäten (z. B. Entwurmung und Vitamin-A-Ergänzungen)?
  4. Wie kostspielig ist das umfassende SHP und welche Faktoren beeinflussen seine Umsetzung?
  5. Welche potenziellen Vorteile bietet das Programm für den langfristigen Aufbau von Humankapital (Lernen, Wohlbefinden usw.)?

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

28700

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Copperbelt
      • Chingola, Copperbelt, Sambia
        • Chingola District Education Board
      • Luanshya, Copperbelt, Sambia
        • Luanshya District Education Board
      • Masaiti, Copperbelt, Sambia
        • Masaiti District Education Board
    • Luapula Province
      • Kawambwa, Luapula Province, Sambia
        • Kawambwa District Education Board
      • Mwense, Luapula Province, Sambia
        • Mwense District Education Board
      • Samfya, Luapula Province, Sambia
        • Samfya District Education Board

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind
  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

  • Schulen: Anspruch auf SHP (in der Regenzeit nicht unzugänglich, im Umkreis von 10 km um das Gesundheitszentrum)
  • Schulverwalter: verfügt über mindestens ein Jahr Erfahrung in der Schule und ist der Grundschulleiter oder stellvertretender Schulleiter (z. B. Schulleiter, stellvertretender Schulleiter, Oberlehrer, der als Finanzbeauftragter fungiert)
  • Lernende: Eingeschrieben und anwesend in der Schule zu Beginn, in der 1., 3. oder 5. Klasse
  • Eltern, Hauptbetreuer oder Erziehungsberechtigte ausgewählter Lernender. Erziehungsberechtigte sind berechtigt, wenn sie bei dem Kind bleiben und in Abwesenheit der Eltern/Hauptbetreuer Entscheidungen über die Schul- und Gesundheitsfürsorge des Kindes treffen.
  • Lehrer: alle Lehrer, die an studienberechtigten Schulen beschäftigt sind (keine Freiwilligen)
  • Gesundheitseinrichtungen: ausgewiesene Einrichtungen im Einzugsgebiet von Studienschulen
  • Personal der Gesundheitseinrichtung: alle Mitarbeiter, die OPD-Beratungen durchführen und während der Datenerfassungstage der Einrichtung anwesend sind

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Schulgesundheitsprogramm (SHP)
SHP wurde von Healthy Learners (HL) in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Bildungsministerium (MOE) entwickelt und folgt den WHO-Richtlinien für Schulgesundheitsaktivitäten. HL unterstützt die Modernisierung grundlegender sanitärer Einrichtungen und den Bau eines speziellen „Gesundheitsraums“ in der Schule; bildet ausgewählte Lehrer zu Schulgesundheitshelfern (SHWs) aus, die Gesundheits- und Hygieneerziehung vermitteln, Entwurmungen und Vitamin-A-Ergänzungen in der Schule koordinieren und kranke Schüler im Gesundheitsraum der Schule mithilfe eines klinischen Entscheidungsunterstützungssystems (CDSS) beurteilen und entweder behandeln Schule oder wenden Sie sich an das örtliche Gesundheitszentrum. Im Gesundheitszentrum werden von SHWs überwiesene Kinder vorrangig von Gesundheitspersonal behandelt, das sie innerhalb von 30 Minuten nach ihrer Ankunft in der Einrichtung behandelt. Schulen schaffen außerdem Schülernetzwerke (ein „Buddy“-System), bei dem die Lernenden gegenseitig ihre Abwesenheiten überwachen und sich mit SHWs abstimmen, die sich dann mit dem Haushalt in Verbindung setzen können.

Kombinationsintervention, bestehend aus:

  • Modernisierung der Sanitäranlagen und Bau eines „Gesundheitsraums“ in der Schule
  • Ausbildung von Gesundheitslehrern: 5–10 Lehrer pro Schule werden von Healthy Learners rekrutiert und zwei Wochen lang zu School Health Workers (SHWs) ausgebildet
  • Die SHWs: (1) bieten Aufklärung über Gesundheit und gute sanitäre Einrichtungen und Hygiene, (2) koordinieren sich mit örtlichen Kliniken, um vorbeugende Pflege bereitzustellen (z. B. Schulentwurmung und Vitamin-A-Ergänzung); (3) erkrankte Studierende im Gesundheitsraum mit einem Tablet-basierten klinischen Entscheidungsunterstützungssystem (CDSS) beurteilen; (4) erkrankte Studierende im Gesundheitsraum wegen bestimmter Erkrankungen (Malaria, Durchfall, Schistosomiasis, Lungenentzündung, Bindehautentzündung) behandeln oder (5) sich zur Behandlung an die Gesundheitseinrichtung überweisen; (6) Überwachung der Abwesenheit von Lernenden
  • Überweisung: Von SHWs empfohlene Lernende erhalten vom SHW ein Überweisungsformular, das Informationen zu Symptomen und vom CDSS vorgeschlagene Diagnose enthält. Die Lernenden werden in der örtlichen Klinik priorisiert.
Andere Namen:
  • SHP
Die Schulen setzen die Regierungspolitik um, zweimal im Jahr Entwurmungsmittel und Vitamin-A-Ergänzungsmittel an Lernende zu verteilen. Zusätzliche Unterstützung durch Healthy Learners gewährleistet eine zuverlässige Bereitstellung.
Andere Namen:
  • Entwurmung
Aktiver Komparator: Entwurmung und Vitamin-A-Ergänzung
Gesunde Lernende profitieren von der zuverlässigen Durchführung des nationalen Entwurmungsprogramms zweimal im Jahr, und zwar im gleichen Zeitraum wie im SHP-Arm, um die Wirkung der Prävention allein mit dem gesamten SHP-Arm vergleichen zu können.
Die Schulen setzen die Regierungspolitik um, zweimal im Jahr Entwurmungsmittel und Vitamin-A-Ergänzungsmittel an Lernende zu verteilen. Zusätzliche Unterstützung durch Healthy Learners gewährleistet eine zuverlässige Bereitstellung.
Andere Namen:
  • Entwurmung
Kein Eingriff: Status Quo
Die Schulen sollen bis zum Ende des Versuchs wie gewohnt weiterarbeiten und außer den üblichen, von der Regierung gemäß der Schulgesundheits- und Ernährungsrichtlinie von 2006 geplanten und organisierten Aktivitäten keine Eingriffe vornehmen.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Any healthcare utilisation
Zeitfenster: Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
The proportion of learners who sought formal care (any government health centre or hospital, or the school health room). Equals one if reported at least once during the health diary observation period.
Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Proportion of serious illness episodes where child sought healthcare
Zeitfenster: Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.

The investigators will calculate this as the proportion of "serious" illness episodes for which a child seeks care, at the child level. In other words, the number of serious illness episodes with care divided by the total number of serious illness episodes, for all children with at least one serious illness episode.

A serious illness episode is one during which a child's ill-health symptoms are severe enough to require medical care, either immediately or the next day. This classification is based on WHO tools (c-IMCI and IMAI): Care is needed when (i) a child experiences any red-flag symptom (e.g. difficulty breathing, convulsions); (ii) has symptoms suggestive of certain conditions (e.g. measles, malaria); (iii) has experienced mild symptoms for a long time (coughing for 14 days, etc).

During an illness episode, a child will be considered to seek medical care if they visit (i) the health room (treatment arm) or (ii) a government clinic or hospital (any arm).

Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Panel-based attendance rate
Zeitfenster: Repeated measure captured at each of five unannounced attendance spot checks: term 1 2025, term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 4-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)
The program's effect on school attendance is assessed using data collected through repeated, unannounced spot checks at each school. The primary attendance measure will be based on the sample of children enrolled in the study at baseline and confirmed to still be enrolled in their original school at the time of the visit. In this sample, the attendance rate, measured at each attendance spot check, will be the proportion of those children confirmed present in class on the day of the visit.
Repeated measure captured at each of five unannounced attendance spot checks: term 1 2025, term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 4-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)
Register-based (cross-sectional) attendance
Zeitfenster: Repeated measure captured at each of four unannounced attendance spot checks: term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 8-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)
Additional measure of attendance, focusing on students in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7 at the time of the spot check. This register-based measure is defined as the proportion of children on the register who are present on the day of the spot check and confirmed by school staff as enrolled in the selected class on the visit day.
Repeated measure captured at each of four unannounced attendance spot checks: term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 8-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Malaria prevalence (proportion of children testing positive for malaria)
Zeitfenster: Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Testing for the presence of P. falciparum, non-falciparum species, or a mixed infection. The tests are performed using a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) on the sample of children taking part in the health diaries (testing will occur at the end of the period).
Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Proportion of children with moderate or severe anaemia
Zeitfenster: Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Haemoglobin concentration measured using a HemoCue photometer in the sample of children taking part in the health diaries (testing will occur at the end of the period). Anemia severity categories will be based on the WHO classification which depends on the age and sex of the child. Haemoglobin is first adjusted for elevation using the WHO (2024) continuous adjustment, defined in g/L as 0.0056384 times elevation in metres plus 0.0000003 times elevation squared, evaluated at each school's recorded GPS elevation and subtracted from the measured value. Moderate-to-severe anaemia is considered when adjusted haemoglobin is below 11.0 g/dL, a threshold common to all age bands represented in the sample.
Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Proportion of children with diarrhoea
Zeitfenster: Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Incidence of diarrhoea - carer report of the child experiencing three or more loose or watery stools.
Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Haematuria prevalence
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Recall over last 7 days.
An indicator for incidence of haematuria (blood in urine) reported by the caregiver.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Recall over last 7 days.
Share of diary days with any reported symptom
Zeitfenster: Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.

The share of days on which the child was reported to have any symptom, over the eight week symptom diary recording period (0 days if no symptoms recorded).

Proportion of completed health-diary days on which the child reported one or more symptoms. Computed per child as (diary days with ≥1 reported symptom) ÷ (completed diary days). Defined for all children in the diary sub-sample; no conditioning on illness status.

Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Duration of illness episodes - all episodes
Zeitfenster: Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Mean number of consecutive symptom-days per illness episode, among episodes in children who reported illness during the diary window. Estimated from a discrete-time hazard model for symptom resolution: episodes still ongoing at the end of the observation window contribute their observed (censored) days rather than being dropped; episodes already symptomatic on the first diary day are excluded (start date unobservable / left-truncated). Reported as a restricted mean over the eight-week observation window.
Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Duration of illness episodes - serious episodes
Zeitfenster: Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.

As for the all-episodes duration outcome, restricted to episodes classified as serious.

A serious illness episode is one during which a child's ill-health symptoms are severe enough to require medical care, either immediately or the next day. This classification is based on WHO tools (c-IMCI and IMAI): Care is needed when (i) a child experiences any red-flag symptom (e.g. difficulty breathing, convulsions); (ii) has symptoms suggestive of certain conditions (e.g. measles, malaria); (iii) has experienced mild symptoms for a long time (coughing for 14 days, etc).

Mean consecutive symptom-days per serious episode, estimated from the same discrete-time hazard model, with ongoing episodes contributing observed (censored) days and day-1 episodes excluded as left-truncated. Reported as a restricted mean over the eight-week window.

Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Menstrual health practices
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Share of responses indicating good menstrual management across the practices items. Item set is the final 5 items pilot-retained from a pre-specified pool adapted from the same validated instruments. Computed per respondent as (good-management responses) / (items answered), averaged across girls who have reached menarche in the sub-sample. Higher values indicate better practices.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Menstrual health stigma index
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
First principal component of a PCA over the menstrual health stigma items (final 4 items pilot-retained from a pre-specified pool adapted from the same validated instruments; construction rule fixed prior to piloting). Loadings estimated on the pooled sample; scores standardised to the control-group mean and standard deviation. Oriented so that higher values indicate lesser stigma; a beneficial programme effect corresponds to a reduction. Constructed for girls grade 5 or above who have heard of menstruation.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Learning - Literacy
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Item-response-theory (IRT) ability score in literacy, estimated over per-item responses from the grade-banded exam blocks (lower-, middle-, and upper-grade versions) placed on a common within-domain scale via shared anchor items. Standardised to the control-group mean and standard deviation. Higher values indicate greater literacy ability.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Learning - Numeracy
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
IRT ability score in numeracy, estimated over per-item responses from the grade-banded exam blocks (lower-, middle-, upper-grade versions) linked to a common within-domain scale via shared anchor items. Standardised to the control-group mean and SD. Higher values indicate greater numeracy ability.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Learning - Science and Health
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
IRT ability score in science and health knowledge, estimated over per-item responses from the grade-banded exam blocks (lower-, middle-, upper-grade versions) linked to a common within-domain scale via shared anchor items. Standardised to the control-group mean and SD. Higher values indicate greater ability.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Learning - overall
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Composite learning score, defined as the mean of the three control-standardised domain scores (literacy, numeracy, science), each an IRT ability score placed on a common within-domain scale across grade bands via anchor items and standardised to the control-group mean and SD. Domains enter with equal weight. Higher values indicate greater overall learning ability.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Students' working memory and attention
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Students' working memory and attention is measured using the Digit Span task, a widely used short-term memory and working memory assessment. Enumerators orally present a sequence of digits at a rate of one per second, and students are asked to repeat the digits in the same order (Digit Span Forward) and then in reverse order (Digit Span Backward). The task measures students' auditory attention, concentration, and working memory capacity, which are foundational components of general cognitive functioning and predictive of academic achievement. Scores are recorded as the total number of correct sequences reproduced, following standard administration and scoring procedures.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Combined measure of attendance and retention
Zeitfenster: Repeated measure captured at each of five unannounced attendance spot checks: term 1 2025, term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 4-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)
Proportion of children confirmed present in class on the day of the visit, out of the total number of children enrolled at the school at baseline and still alive. This measure effectively treats children who may have transferred to another study school as 'absent', dropped out, or temporarily relocated.
Repeated measure captured at each of five unannounced attendance spot checks: term 1 2025, term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 4-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)
Attendance rate including learners transfered to other study schools
Zeitfenster: Repeated measure captured at each of five unannounced attendance spot checks: term 1 2025, term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 4-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)
Proportion of children confirmed present in class on the day of the visit either in their original school or in another school to which they have transferred if that school is one of the study schools, out of the total number of children enrolled at baseline and still alive. Analysis will follow Intention-to-Treat principle, treating participants as assigned to their original treatment arm, even if they moved to a different study arm school.
Repeated measure captured at each of five unannounced attendance spot checks: term 1 2025, term 2 2025, term 3 2025, term 1 2026, and term 2 2026 (alongside endline), approximately 4-22 months after the start of the intervention (September 2024)
Illness- or menstruation-related absence
Zeitfenster: Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
From the diary's daily records, caregivers flag whether the child attended school each day and records the reason for each absent day. The reasons are: illness (1), was menstruating (2), farming (3), school closure or school event (4), bad weather (5), religious reasons (6), market day (7), public holiday (8), fishing (9), mining (10), working with parents (11), no uniform/shoes/books (12), and other (-97). A day missed is considered caused by an illness or menstruation-related absence when the reason is (1) or (2). The sample is restricted to school days by dropping weekends and public holidays. This measure is the share of the child's school days in the diary window lost to health-related absence: health-related absence days divided by total school days observed.
Eight-week daily health-diary window, completed once per child in either term 1 (rainy season, January-March 2026; ~16-18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (cold season, May-July 2026; ~20-22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Menstrual health knowledge
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Share of correct responses across three menstrual health knowledge items. The item set is the final items retained after in-country piloting for comprehension and relevance, from a pre-specified pool adapted from validated instruments. Computed per respondent as (correct responses) / (items answered), averaged within the relevant sub-sample: girls grade 5 or above who have heard of menstruation. Higher values indicate greater knowledge.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Boys' menstrual health knowledge
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Menstrual health knowledge index (share of correct responses), constructed identically to the girls' secondary-outcome knowledge - same item set and same (correct responses) / (items answered) construction - on the sample of boys who have heard of menstruation. Higher values indicate greater knowledge. Parallels the girls' secondary outcome to assess whether the programme shifts boys' menstrual knowledge.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Boys' menstrual health stigma
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.

Menstrual health stigma index, constructed identically to the girls' secondary-outcome stigma index - first principal component of a PCA over the same stigma items - on the sample of boys who have heard of menstruation. Standardised to the boys' control-group mean and standard deviation; oriented so that higher values indicate lesser stigma, consistent with the girls' index.

Parallels the girls' secondary outcome to assess whether the programme shifts boys' menstrual stigma.

Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
School environment and belonging
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Measured using a short school belonging and climate scale drawn from the Young Lives study, designed to capture children's subjective experiences of school in a simple, age-appropriate way. The tool focuses on core dimensions of belonging-enjoyment, perceived care from teachers and peers, safety, respect, and mutual support-using a consistent three-point response scale ("No, almost never", "Sometimes", "Yes, almost always"). Its brevity makes it suitable for large surveys with primary-school children while still capturing meaningful variation in how supported and included students feel in their school environment. To analyse responses, investigators will construct a simple index using principal component analysis, normalising on the control group for ease of interpretation.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Children's emotional well-being at school
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Using the child well-being at school scale developed by the Young Lives study to capture children's emotional experiences while at school in a simple and age-appropriate way. The tool focuses on both positive and negative affective states-see appendix-and uses a consistent three-point response scale ("No, almost never", "Sometimes", "Yes, almost always"). Its simplicity makes it suitable for administration to primary school children. To analyse responses, investigators will construct a simple index using principal component analysis, normalising on the control group for ease of interpretation.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Learner-reported teacher engagement and conduct
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
A PCA index z-scored on the control group from the learner survey, combining a conduct checklist (teacher late, absent, or on their phone) with a 5-point Likert engagement battery (teacher cares, makes lessons interesting, offers extra help, motivates), oriented so a higher score is better conduct and engagement
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Any Bullying
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Indicator equal to 1 if child responds yes to any bullying item, from a five item yes/no checklist of acts experienced in the last week attended (mean names, threats, physical harm, exclusion, lies).
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Bullying count
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Count of acts of bullying, when child responds yes to any bullying item, from a five item yes/no checklist of acts experienced in the last week attended (mean names, threats, physical harm, exclusion, lies).
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Corporal punishment
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
From a parallel yes/no checklist of acts a teacher used on the child in the past month, spanning verbal (shouting) and escalating physical acts. The primary measure is an indicator for any act and the secondary measures are the count of distinct acts and a physical-punishment indicator restricted to the acts involving physical contact.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Corporal punishment acceptance norms
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Acceptance of corporal punishment, elicited via a teacher discipline vignette (respondents hear a scenario and rate the depicted teacher's reaction). Standardised-mean acceptance-norms index over four items: (i) own acceptability of the reaction; (ii) injunctive social norm - number of five colleagues expected to find it acceptable (0-5); (iii) descriptive social norm - number of five colleagues expected to react likewise (0-5); (iv) own behavioural attitude - self-rated likelihood of acting the same way. Each item is oriented so that higher indicates greater acceptance and standardised to the control-group mean and SD before averaging (standardisation places the differing item scales on a common metric). Higher index values indicate greater acceptance of corporal punishment.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Teacher job satisfaction
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Teacher-reported job satisfaction, summarised across the eight satisfaction items (teacher satisfaction 1-8) as standardised-mean index. Higher values indicate greater satisfaction. Teacher-level.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Teacher burnout
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Emotional-exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the primary burnout indicator, summarised as subscale mean. Higher values indicate greater exhaustion.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Teacher turnover intention
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Indicator = 1 if the teacher reports intending to leave teaching at the point of the survey. All endline-surveyed teachers. Higher = greater intent to leave.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Realised teacher turnover
Zeitfenster: Baseline to endline: teacher's school-presence status at endline (May-July 2026) relative to their originally sampled school at baseline ([baseline month/year]); interval of approximately 24-26 months.
Indicator = 1 if a teacher randomly sampled at baseline is no longer at their original school at endline (whether they left teaching or moved schools), from tracking of the baseline-sampled cohort rather than the endline survey. Population differs from the survey-based teacher outcomes; measures change over the baseline-to-endline interval. Time Frame: Unit: proportion.
Baseline to endline: teacher's school-presence status at endline (May-July 2026) relative to their originally sampled school at baseline ([baseline month/year]); interval of approximately 24-26 months.
Teacher locus of control
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.

Locus-of-control index over four items:

  1. "There is little I can do to help a student's learning."
  2. "Pupils come unprepared from previous grades."
  3. "Parents do not have the necessary education to help their child be more successful at school."
  4. "If parents would do more for their children, I could do more." where respondents answer "agree" or "disagree". Summarised as standardised-mean index, oriented so that higher values indicate more locus of control.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Teacher time use - health-related duties
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Self-reported hours in a typical day spent on health-related programmes in the school, from the teacher time-use module (recall over four mutually exclusive categories: teaching/instructing; planning and grading; health-related programmes; other school responsibilities). Primary time-use quantity; the mechanism-relevant category for a school-health intervention.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Teacher time use - teaching/instruction
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Self-reported hours in a typical day spent teaching/instructing, from the teacher time-use module (recall over four mutually exclusive categories: teaching/instructing; planning and grading; health-related programmes; other school responsibilities). Reported alongside health-duty time to capture reallocation away from core instruction.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Anthropometry - stunting prevalence
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Prevalence of stunting (chronic undernutrition) among children measured at endline. A child is classified stunted if their height-for-age z-score (HAZ) is more than 2 SD below the reference median, using the WHO Growth Reference for school-aged children and adolescents (de Onis et al. 2007; ages 5-19, sex-specific), with z-scores computed from completed age in months at the date of measurement. HAZ values outside -6 to +6 are treated as biologically implausible and excluded per WHO flagging conventions; the number of excluded observations is reported.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Any anaemia
Zeitfenster: Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Using the same haemoglobin measurements collected during the biomarker survey (hbg result, in g/dL), investigators will construct the proportion of children suffering from any anaemia (mild, moderate or severe), using WHO thresholds: A child is classified as anaemic if adjusted haemoglobin falls below 11.5 g/dL at ages 5 to 11, below 12.0 g/dL at ages 12 to 14, below 12.0 g/dL for non-pregnant females aged 15 and above, and below 13.0 g/dL for males aged 15 and above, with age taken at the date of the biomarker round.
Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Malaria - untreated infection prevalence
Zeitfenster: Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Indicator = 1 if a child in the biomarker sample tests positive for malaria and has no treatment recorded in their diary in the past 4 weeks; 0 otherwise, including test-negative children. Defined over all children tested, so the estimate does not condition on infection status. Because this joint indicator reflects both infection prevalence and treatment coverage, it is interpreted as descriptive/mechanistic and read alongside overall infection prevalence, not as a standalone treatment-gap contrast.
Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Malaria - asymptomatic infection prevalence
Zeitfenster: Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Indicator = 1 if a child tests positive and reports no malaria-suggestive symptom (fever, headache, vomiting, lethargy) at the time of the test or in the four preceding days; 0 otherwise, including negatives. Over all children tested; no conditioning on infection status. Descriptive/mechanistic; read alongside overall prevalence.
Single biomarker measurement at the end of the child's diary round - term 1 (~March 2026; ~18 months after intervention start) or term 2 (~July 2026; ~22 months). Data reported across both rounds.
Parental health knowledge
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Share of correct answers on a health-knowledge battery (HN01, HN04, HHK1, HHK2, DS10, HN05) covering nutrition, hygiene, and specific child illnesses. Responses will be scored as correct or incorrect, with "don't know" treated as incorrect, and summed into an additive index.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Parental relative trust in the school health room (vs government clinic)
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Relative expected provider quality for the school health room versus the government clinic, from a paired quality-expectation vignette: respondents estimate, for the same 10 hypothetical febrile children, how many would receive a correct diagnosis and how many a full supply of correct treatment at each provider (0-10 each). Relative-trust index = the school-health-room minus government-clinic expectation, averaged across the diagnosis and treatment items (equivalently, the mean of the two paired differences). Positive values indicate greater expected quality at the school health room.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Willingness to pay for school health programme
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
From a takeit-or-leave-it elicitation in which each guardian is offered a randomly assigned annual fee for the school health room [10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 Kwacha - 30 is the real marginal cost of the programme] and states whether they would pay it. For the control group, the same elicitation takes place but the programme description is hypothetical. The willingness to pay measure is the indicator for accepting the offered price.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Anthropometry - thinness prevalence
Zeitfenster: Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.
Prevalence of thinness (acute undernutrition; the WHO term for this age group) among children measured at endline. A child is classified thin if their BMI-for-age z-score (BAZ) is more than 2 SD below the reference median, using the same WHO reference. BMI-for-age is used rather than weight-for-age, which is confounded by stunting; BMI-for-age standardises weight against the child's own height. BAZ values outside -5 to +5 are excluded as biologically implausible per WHO flagging; the number excluded is reported.
Endline, May-July 2026 (approximately 20-22 months after the start of the intervention, September 2024). Single assessment.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Mylene Lagarde, PhD, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Studienstuhl: David Ross, PhD, University of Stellenbosch

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

27. Februar 2024

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. Juli 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Dezember 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

12. August 2024

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

15. August 2024

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

19. August 2024

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

27. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

25. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Die Forscher teilen einen vollständigen Datensatz auf individueller Ebene mit allen primären und sekundären Studienergebnissen, allen anderen in der Analyse verwendeten Variablen und Behandlungszuweisungen. Die Daten werden anonymisiert, um sicherzustellen, dass keine Teilnehmer persönlich identifiziert werden können (direkt oder indirekt).

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

Die Daten stehen dauerhaft zur Verfügung. Sie werden mit der Veröffentlichung der Studie in einer Zeitschrift verfügbar, da wir im Rahmen der Veröffentlichung ein Replikationspaket bereitstellen.

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren