Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Die Wirkung von Ohrstöpseln auf den Würgereflex und den Patientenkomfort bei der Wurzelkanalbehandlung

30. September 2026 aktualisiert von: Beyhan Başkan

Die Wirkung der Verwendung von maßgefertigten Silikon-Ohrstöpseln auf die Schwere des Würgereflexes, Verhaltensreaktionen und Alpha-Amylase-Spiegel im Speichel als Stressbiomarker bei Patienten während einer Wurzelkanalbehandlung: Eine randomisierte kontrollierte Studie

This study evaluated whether wearing an earplug during root canal treatment reduces the gag reflex and the stress it causes. Forty adults who had a severe or very severe gag reflex were randomly divided into two groups. One group received an earplug in the ear opposite to the side being treated; the other group received standard treatment without an earplug. The severity of the gag reflex was scored by an observer, stress was measured using a saliva sample (salivary alpha-amylase), and treatment time and gag-related interruptions were recorded. The results showed that the earplug group had lower gag-reflex scores, lower stress levels, and shorter treatment times with fewer interruptions. No side effects were reported. These findings suggest that a simple, low-cost earplug may help patients who gag easily during dental treatment.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Background: An exaggerated gag reflex is a common problem during dental treatment, especially in endodontics, where uninterrupted working time and moisture control are essential. Pharmacological approaches carry risks, and evidence for non-pharmacological methods is limited. Earplug stimulation of the external auditory canal has been proposed as a simple, non-invasive way to suppress the gag reflex.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of earplug application during endodontic treatment on gag-reflex severity, physiological stress (salivary alpha-amylase, sAA), and clinical efficiency (treatment time and gag-related interruption ratio).

Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 40 adults with severe or very severe gagging (Dickinson-Fiske Gagging Severity Index grade 4-5) requiring endodontic treatment. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to an earplug group or a control group. A custom-moulded silicone earplug was placed in the ear contralateral to the operating field. The operator and the outcome assessor were blinded by an identical adhesive ear cover applied to all participants; participants could not be blinded. Gag-reflex severity was scored with an 8-item behavioural scale (0-8). Unstimulated whole saliva was collected before and after treatment for sAA measurement. Total treatment time and gag-related interruption time were recorded, and the interruption ratio was calculated as (interruption time / total treatment time) × 100. Non-parametric tests and baseline-adjusted ANCOVA on log-transformed sAA were used.

Results: The earplug group had a lower behavioural gag-reflex score (median 3.0 vs 5.5; p < 0.01) and a more favourable severity distribution (trend p < 0.01). sAA decreased after treatment with the earplug but increased in controls (median change -31.8% vs +76.2%); baseline-adjusted post-treatment sAA was 59% lower with earplug use (geometric mean ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.32-0.53; p < 0.001). Treatment time and the interruption ratio were markedly lower with earplug use (both p < 0.001). No adverse effects were observed.

Conclusions: Earplug application during endodontic treatment was associated with reduced gag-reflex severity, an attenuated physiological stress response, and improved procedural efficiency. As a simple, inexpensive, non-invasive technique, the earplug may be a useful adjunct for managing severe gagging in endodontic practice. Larger, multi-centre trials with patient-reported outcomes are warranted.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07493200.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

40

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Kahramanmaraş, Türkei (türkiye), 46140
        • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Universty

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

Age over 18 years Need for endodontic treatment Score of 4 (severe gagging: occurs with all forms of treatment) or 5 (very severe gagging: makes treatment impossible) on the Dickinson and Fiske Gagging Severity Index (GSI)

Exclusion Criteria:

Systemic disease Pregnancy or lactation Diagnosed central or peripheral nervous system disorders Use of anti-emetic medication Ear infection or structural abnormality of the external auditory canal

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Experimental Group

Patients in this group (n=20) will have a custom-made silicone earplug placed in the ear opposite the side where the dentist is working during their root canal treatment. The earplug is fabricated immediately before the procedure using soft silicone material to ensure a comfortable, personalized fit. No other pharmacological or behavioral interventions for gag reflex control will be used.

A personalized earplug fabricated from a soft, two-component addition-cure silicone (C-type silicone), commonly used for dental impressions. The two components are mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions and gently injected into the patient's external auditory canal on the side contralateral to the tooth receiving treatment. The silicone is allowed to polymerize for approximately 2-3 minutes, creating a custom-fit plug that conforms precisely to the individual contours of the ear canal. This ensures comfortable, continuous, and gentle tactile stimulation to the walls of the ear canal throughout the entire root canal procedure. The earplug is removed at the end of the treatment and is for single-patient use only. No other devices or pharmacological agents are used in conjunction with this intervention.

Kein Eingriff: Control Group

Patients in this group (n=20) will receive standard root canal treatment without any earplug placement. No interventions for gag reflex control will be used. All outcome measures (gag reflex severity, behavioral responses, treatment pause ratio, salivary alpha-amylase) will be collected in the same manner as for the experimental group.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Behavioural Gag-Reflex Score
Zeitfenster: Throughout the root canal procedure (continuous observation by a blinded assessor)

An 8-item behavioural observation scale (0-8) was used to quantify the intraoperative gag response. One point was assigned for each of: eye-squeezing, sweating, physical contraction, withdrawal, groaning, crying, breath-holding, and increased salivation. The total score was categorised as Mild (0-2), Moderate (3-4), Severe (5-6), or Very Severe (7-8).

Throughout the root canal procedure (continuous observation by a blinded assessor)

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Behavioural Gag-Reflex Severity Distribution
Zeitfenster: Throughout the root canal procedure

The total 8-item behavioural score (0-8) was categorised as Mild (0-2), Moderate (3-4), Severe (5-6), or Very Severe (7-8). The distribution of these categories after treatment was compared between groups using the Cochran-Armitage trend test.

Throughout the root canal procedure
Gag-Related Interruption Ratio
Zeitfenster: Throughout the procedure

The cumulative duration of gag-related pauses was divided by total treatment time and multiplied by 100. Total treatment time was measured from the start of access-cavity preparation to completion of the root-canal filling.

Throughout the procedure
Salivary α-Amylase Activity
Zeitfenster: Immediately before and immediately after the procedure

Unstimulated whole saliva was collected before and after treatment, centrifuged (10,000 × g, 10 min, 4 °C), and stored at -80 °C. sAA activity was measured colorimetrically using a commercial kit (Elabscience, Cat. No. E-BC-K007-M) based on the DNS method; optical density was read at 540 nm.

Immediately before and immediately after the procedure
Total Treatment Time
Zeitfenster: Throughout the procedure

Time from start of access-cavity preparation to completion of root-canal filling, measured with a digital stopwatch.

Throughout the procedure

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

12. Mai 2025

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

5. Februar 2026

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

5. Februar 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

19. März 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

19. März 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

25. März 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

5. Oktober 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

30. September 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. September 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

De-identified individual participant data (demographic, behavioural, salivary α-amylase, and procedural time data) will be shared. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

Data will be available after publication of the study results and for 5 years thereafter.

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

De-identified IPD and supporting documents will be made available to researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the corresponding author and the institutional ethics committee. Data will be shared for non-commercial research purposes only. Requests should be sent to beyhanbaskan@ksu.edu.tr.

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ICF

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren