Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in Maxillary Esthetic Zone Using Bovine Bone Graft Versus Extended Sticky Bone With Simultaneous Implant Placement

9. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Mansoura University
This research is designed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of bovine bone graft (Medpark) versus extended sticky bone used for horizontal augmentation of atrophied esthetic area of maxillary ridge associated with simultaneous implant placement.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Patient selection This study will involve sixteen implants inserted in patients with missing upper tooth / teeth in the esthetic zone accompanied by horizontal alveolar ridge resorption, seeking future tooth replacement. The patients will be selected from the Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient aged 18-45 years.
  2. Cooperative patient with high motivation and acceptable oral hygiene.
  3. Maxillary narrow ridge in the esthetic zone that needed horizontal bone augmentation. (Class I Siebert classification). (22)
  4. No deep undercut at the ridge in the buccal aspect.
  5. The presence of enough keratinized gingiva(≥3mm).(23)
  6. Sufficient inter-arch space to accommodate the future prosthesis. (24)
  7. Patients able to comply with the required recall visits.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Local and / or systemic conditions that contraindicate the placement of dental implant or surgery
  2. Smokers
  3. Pregnancy.
  4. Parafunctional habits, including bruxism and clenching.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

16

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Ägypten
      • Al Mansurah, Ägypten
        • Mansoura University
      • Al Mansurah, Ägypten
        • Amira Attia

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 18-45 years, Cooperative patient with high motivation and acceptable oral hygiene, maxillary narrow ridge in the esthetic zone that needed horizontal bone augmentation. (Class I Siebert classification) (24),No deep undercut at the ridge in the buccal aspect, The presence of enough keratinized gingiva(≥3mm).(25), sufficient inter-arch space to accommodate the future prosthesis. (26) , and Patients able to comply with the required recall visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Local and / or systemic conditions that contraindicate the placement of dental implant or surgery, smokers, pregnancy and parafunctional habits, including bruxism and clenching.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Eight dental implants were inserted simultaneously with horizontal ridge augmentation using Medpark
For group I, Medpark bone graft was prepared by hydration with sterile saline, gentle mixing, and allowed to partially set before application to the defect site. For group II, extended sticky bone (ESB) was prepared by centrifugation of autologous blood followed by preparation of ALB-PRF and mixing with bone particulates (50:50 allograft: xenograft) to obtain the final graft materia
Verfahren: oral surgery

The oral cavity was prepared using 0.12% chlorhexidine mouth rinse for one minute. Local anesthesia was administered using articaine 4% with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected using a crestal horizontal incision with vertical releasing incisions to expose the surgical site.

Osteotomy preparation was performed using a pilot drill to the planned depth at 800-850 rpm under copious sterile saline irrigation, followed by sequential drilling according to the manufacturer's protocol until the final implant size was achieved. The sterile implant was then inserted using a ratchet wrench. Implant stability was immediately assessed using resonance frequency analysis (Osstell device), and cover screws were subsequently placed.

For group I, Medpark bone graft was prepared by hydration with sterile saline, gentle mixing, and allowed to partially set before application to the defect site. For group II, extended sticky bone (ESB) was prepared b

Verfahren: oral surgery

The oral cavity was prepared using 0.12% chlorhexidine mouth rinse for one minute. Local anesthesia was administered using articaine 4% with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected using a crestal horizontal incision with vertical releasing incisions to expose the surgical site.

Osteotomy preparation was performed using a pilot drill to the planned depth at 800-850 rpm under copious sterile saline irrigation, followed by sequential drilling according to the manufacturer's protocol until the final implant size was achieved. The sterile implant was then inserted using a ratchet wrench. (Fig.1B & Fig.2B) Implant stability was immediately assessed using resonance frequency analysis (Osstell device), and cover screws were subsequently placed.

For group I, Medpark bone graft was prepared by hydration with sterile saline, gentle mixing, and allowed to partially set before application to the defect site. For group II, extended sticky bone (ESB) was prepared b
Experimental: Eight dental implants were inserted simultaneously with horizontal ridge augmentation using extended
Verfahren: oral surgery

The oral cavity was prepared using 0.12% chlorhexidine mouth rinse for one minute. Local anesthesia was administered using articaine 4% with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected using a crestal horizontal incision with vertical releasing incisions to expose the surgical site.

Osteotomy preparation was performed using a pilot drill to the planned depth at 800-850 rpm under copious sterile saline irrigation, followed by sequential drilling according to the manufacturer's protocol until the final implant size was achieved. The sterile implant was then inserted using a ratchet wrench. Implant stability was immediately assessed using resonance frequency analysis (Osstell device), and cover screws were subsequently placed.

For group I, Medpark bone graft was prepared by hydration with sterile saline, gentle mixing, and allowed to partially set before application to the defect site. For group II, extended sticky bone (ESB) was prepared b

Verfahren: oral surgery

The oral cavity was prepared using 0.12% chlorhexidine mouth rinse for one minute. Local anesthesia was administered using articaine 4% with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected using a crestal horizontal incision with vertical releasing incisions to expose the surgical site.

Osteotomy preparation was performed using a pilot drill to the planned depth at 800-850 rpm under copious sterile saline irrigation, followed by sequential drilling according to the manufacturer's protocol until the final implant size was achieved. The sterile implant was then inserted using a ratchet wrench. (Fig.1B & Fig.2B) Implant stability was immediately assessed using resonance frequency analysis (Osstell device), and cover screws were subsequently placed.

For group I, Medpark bone graft was prepared by hydration with sterile saline, gentle mixing, and allowed to partially set before application to the defect site. For group II, extended sticky bone (ESB) was prepared b

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) Values Assessed by Resonance Frequency Analysis
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months after implant placement

Implant stability was assessed using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) with the Osstell device and expressed as Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values. ISQ scores range from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater implant stability and osseointegration.

High stability: ISQ > 70 Medium stability: ISQ 60-69 Low stability: ISQ < 60

Measurements were recorded immediately after implant placement and at the 6-month follow-up.
Baseline and 6 months after implant placement

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Mansoura University

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. November 2025

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. April 2026

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Mai 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

3. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

9. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

15. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

15. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

9. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • Ms.25.04.21

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Resorption

Klinische Studien zur oral surgery

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Kyrgyzstan

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren