Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Once Versus Twice Daily Electrolyte Monitoring in CHF

25 de septiembre de 2017 actualizado por: Christopher Brown, Vanderbilt University

Once Versus Twice Daily Electrolyte Monitoring in CHF; a Study Monitoring Electrolytes in Congestive Heart Failure Patients Being Actively Diuresed in Hospital

Twice daily basic metabolic panel's or labs are common practice at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. However, it is unclear how often the second BMP each day is acted on. the investigators project aims to answer a few fundamental questions about the need for twice daily labs in patients hospitalized with acute/subacute-decompensated congestive heart failure who are being actively diuresed.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Background: Over 5 million Americans are currently suffering from heart failure, resulting in over 1 million hospital admissions each year. Heart failure hospitalizations are one of the most expensive medical problems facing Americans today]. Admissions for acute decompensate heart failure exacerbations are managed medically through oral and intravenous (IV) diuretics. Side effects of diuretics are well established, the most common of which is metabolic derangements, more specifically alterations in levels of potassium . Clinical manifestations of hypokalemia and hyperkalemia are most commonly muscle cramps and clinically insignificant arrhythmia. The most concerning manifestations of hypo and hyperkalemia include symptomatic arrhythmia, myalgia, and more rarely rhabdomyolysis. Active use of diuretics requires monitoring of serum electrolytes to prevent clinically significant derangements in potassium. The frequency of monitoring required to prevent these events has not been established. Monitoring is thus provider dependent. At our single large academic medical center monitoring frequency ranges from 1-2 times daily on average. In this trial we will determine whether twice-daily electrolyte labs result in less frequent clinically hypo or hyperkalemia. We will also investigate a multitude of other outcomes including potential cost savings by reduced laboratory test ordering.

Intervention: Randomization of study population to ONCE daily scheduled BMP or TWICE daily scheduled BMP.

Risk: Risks to both arms of the study are in clinical equipoise and include: Hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, arrhythmia (secondary to hypokalemia or hyperkalemia), delayed identification of rising creatinine (acute kidney injury).

Project goals: Twice daily basic metabolic panel's or labs are common practice at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. However, it is unclear how often the second BMP each day is acted on. Our project aims to answer a few fundamental questions about the need for twice daily labs in patients hospitalized with acute/subacute-decompensated congestive heart failure who are being actively diuresed.

Descriptive:

Age Race Sex JVP on admission JVP on discharge Congestion on CXR Left ventricular ejection fraction Diabetes (Type I, or Type II [defined as HgA1C >6.5%]) Type of cardiomyopathy- ICM vs NON Ace-I or ARB Beta blocker Aldosterone antagonist HF hospitalization within past 12 months Na K (all recorded during stay) Cl BUN Cr (all recorded during stay and most recent prior to hospitalization) Total dose of loop diuretics received during admission Total dose of thiazide diuretics received Total dose of mineralocorticoid antagonist received

Outcomes:

Primary: Proportion of labs spent in ideal potassium range (defined at 3.5-5.0 mmol).

Secondary: Clinically relevant hypokalemia or hyperkalemia; defined as new muscle weakness, rhabdomyolysis, paralysis, ECG changes or conduction. Amount of potassium given, number of times per day potassium was given and average potassium value during stay. Time free from readmission, length of stay, change in weight (as surrogate for amount of diuresis), Input and output, mortality at 1mo and 3mo, cost savings during admission.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

96

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, Estados Unidos, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute decompensated Heart failure (ADHF)
  • actively being diuresed (home dose or greater of diuretics)
  • presentation within 24 hr of enrollment
  • having a history of chronic HF.

Exclusion criteria:

  • First time heart failure diagnosis
  • systolic blood pressure < 90mmHg
  • patients requiring inotropes (other than digoxin) or milrinone
  • estimated glomerular filtration rate <10.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Once daily BMP
Patient in this arm will receive once daily basic metabolic panel to monitor electrolytes
Patients blood is collected in routine fashion for basic blood chemistries
Comparador activo: Twice daily BMP
Patient in this arm will receive twice daily basic metabolic panel to monitor electrolytes
Patients blood is collected in routine fashion for basic blood chemistries

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Composite time spent in ideal potassium range
Periodo de tiempo: entire hospital stay, an expected average of 72 hours
Patients average potassium during their stay will be compared to normal range defined at 3.5-5. 0 (mmol/l). , using general estimating equations allowing for comparisons between groups as well as interpersonally, in addition proportion of labs that are within normal values as stated about will also be compared between groups as well as proportion of labs in the ideal range in each group.
entire hospital stay, an expected average of 72 hours

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cost associated with hospitalization
Periodo de tiempo: entire hospital stay, an expected average of 72 hours
The cost of hospitalization in each of the study arms, using ICD 9 codes billed for during the stay of hospitalization and standardized costs defined by medicare
entire hospital stay, an expected average of 72 hours
length of stay
Periodo de tiempo: entire hospital stay, an expected average of 72 hours
hospital length of stay, calculated in hours from admission to discharge
entire hospital stay, an expected average of 72 hours
readmission rate
Periodo de tiempo: 1 month
rate of readmission for congestive heart failure
1 month

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Christopher Brown, MD, Vanderbilt physician

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de octubre de 2015

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2017

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2017

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

7 de julio de 2015

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de julio de 2015

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

14 de julio de 2015

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

26 de septiembre de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de septiembre de 2017

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 150083

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir