Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Real-world Use and Prognosis of Beta Blocker in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Central China (UPB-ACS)

27 de abril de 2020 actualizado por: Chuanyu Gao, Henan Institute of Cardiovascular Epidemiology

Real-world Use and Prognosis of Beta Blocker in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Central China:a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Research

Beta Blocker therapy is a mainstay of treatment following acute coronary syndromes (ACS), particularly acute myocardial infarction (MI). Studies have repeatedly demonstrated the benefit of Beta blocker therapy following either ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation ACS,and Beta blocker therapy has been a performance measure used to grade hospital performance by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.Although the benefit of Beta blocker therapy has been clearly demonstrated, the doses that have been used in many of these studies are significantly higher than those typically used currently in clinical practice.The benefit of Beta blockers has been ascribed to dose-related heart rate reduction,although alternative mechanisms for their benefit have also been proposed.In addition, the classical Beta blocker trials were performed decades ago, before the modern therapeutic era,which includes reperfusion therapy, potent antithrombotics, and statins. This raises the question of whether titration of Beta blocker therapy to the high doses that had been previously studied provides substantial incremental benefit in current clinical practice over the more frequently prescribed and clinically tolerated doses of Beta blockers.Moreover, a recent study has reported that high-dose Beta blockers were not superior to low-dose Beta blockers,aprovocative finding requiring validation. And until now, there has been no registry on patients with ACS about Between Beta-blocker Treatment in Henan, the most populated (about 100 million) and predominantly rural (66%)province in central China.

This multicenter, prospective, observational study is aimed to analyze the application status and long-term prognostic benefit of beta-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Descripción detallada

  1. Henan institute of cardiology epidemiology is responsible for design, data quality control and statistical analysis.
  2. Data were collected using a uniformed Case Report Form(CRF) by trained staff at each hospital.
  3. Sample size estimation: Based on retrospective observational cohort of ACS patients, 1-year mortality in beta-blocker recipients and non-beta-blocker recipients were 2.5% and 5.6%, respectively. To achieve a precision of 5% with an α of 0.05, the loss ratio of following-up is 15%.The investigators would need a sample of 3000.
  4. Statistical analysis plan: the investigators will report summary statistics for patient characteristics, comorbidities, treatment strategies and outcomes. the investigators will also undertake the following prespecified subgroup analyses: age, sex, STE-ACS or NSTE-ACS, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, smoking.and analyze the association Between Beta-blocker Treatment and Long-term Mortality.
  5. Quality assurance plan 1)Diagnosis of ACS is according to the third universal definition.2)Before registry, a training program on study objectives, data collection, and ACS management is given to the primary investigator and related staff at each participating center.3)Henan institute of cardiology epidemiology will regularly monitored at least 10% of CRFs for accuracy against medical records. If the CRFs are not completed with 98% accuracy, all CRFs are considered unqualified and this staff will be retrained.4)Before entering into the computer, data is queried for invalid and illogical values by research staff in Henan institute of cardiology epidemiology. Participating centres who has the high error rate of data, and no change in 6 months shall be deemed abandoned automatically; participating centres who has the high quality of data will be issued a certificate to reward.5)Investigator meeting will be annually held to conclude the progress, solve existing problems and strengthen program training.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

3000

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, Porcelana, 450000
        • Henan Province People's Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra de probabilidad

Población de estudio

Anticipated 40 eligible sites in Henan province will participate. Each site will enroll patients who meet the inclusion criteria consecutively.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age≥18 years.
  2. Patients with clinical evidence of acute coronary syndrome, including ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina.
  3. Informed consent signed by patients or legal guardians.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Expected survival <12 months

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
including all-caused death, nonfatal- myocardial infarction,and stroke
1 year

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
Periodo de tiempo: At discharge(an average of 10 days),6 month
including all-caused death, nonfatal- myocardial infarction,and stroke
At discharge(an average of 10 days),6 month
Coronary revascularization
Periodo de tiempo: 6 month,1 year
including PCI,CABG,and PTCA
6 month,1 year
Re-hospitalized
Periodo de tiempo: 6 month,1 year
Including hospitalization due to heart disease and noncardiac disease
6 month,1 year
Bleeding
Periodo de tiempo: At discharge(an average of 10 days),6 month,1 year
according to GUSTO bleeding grade(excluding hemorrhage stroke)
At discharge(an average of 10 days),6 month,1 year
Recurrent angina
Periodo de tiempo: At discharge(an average of 10 days)
Recurrent angina during hospitalization
At discharge(an average of 10 days)
the aggravation of Angina pectoris
Periodo de tiempo: 6 month,1 year
Angina pectoris graded of CCS(CanadianCardiovascularSociety) rating at least one level
6 month,1 year
New arrhythmia
Periodo de tiempo: At discharge(an average of 10 days),6 month,1 year
including atrial fibrillation,thoracicoutletsyndrome,ventricular fibrillation,sick sinus syndrome,grade atrioventricular block and so on
At discharge(an average of 10 days),6 month,1 year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2017

Finalización primaria (Actual)

26 de abril de 2020

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

26 de abril de 2020

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

12 de abril de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

12 de abril de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

17 de abril de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

28 de abril de 2020

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de abril de 2020

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2020

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir