Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Comparing Approaches to Treat Older Adult Women's Urge Incontinence: Pilot Feasibility and Randomized Controlled Trial (SHUW)

11 de febrero de 2019 actualizado por: Katarina Felsted, University of Utah

Comparing Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction With the Health Enhancement Program in the Treatment of Urinary Urge Incontinence in Older Adult Women: A Pilot Feasibility and Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of conducting a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness-based stress reduction with the health enhancement program on symptoms of urinary urge incontinence in older adult women, and to establish preliminary efficacy of these two approaches on symptoms of urinary urge incontinence.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

The overarching goal of this research is to evaluate potential treatment options for older women with symptoms of urinary urge incontinence, with a specific focus on Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, a promising therapeutic approach in preliminary studies and one increasingly used to treat symptoms associated with brain-visceral interactions. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy will be tested in two randomized study arms: a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction intervention group and a Health Enhancement Program intervention comparison group.

This research study will explore the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of treating urinary urge incontinence in older adult women with mindfulness-based stress reduction in comparison to the health enhancement program through a randomized controlled pilot study. Feasibility determinants will include both research feasibility (recruitment, retention, treatment fidelity) and intervention feasibility (acceptability, tolerability, treatment adherence). Clinical outcomes to evaluate preliminary intervention efficacy will include severity of urinary urge incontinence symptoms, bother of urinary urge incontinence symptoms, perceived stress, and perceived level of self-efficacy of self-management of urinary urge incontinence symptoms. Preliminary efficacy of the intervention will also be evaluated with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, a process measure that rates the patient's "response of a condition to a therapy" (Ryan, n.d., p. 1).

This combined pilot feasibility study and randomized controlled trial will evaluate specific factors crucial to the success of a large trial to evaluate the effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on urinary urge incontinence in older adult women. Moore (2011) recommended that the pilot study design parallel the future larger study, particularly when evaluating feasibility in the pilot study. The capacity for hypothesis testing, or establishing causal inference is limited in a pilot study due to insufficient power; however, the information from efficacy testing is vital in informing future larger scale clinical trials. This study will serve as a necessary step for the development of effectiveness trials of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in treatment of urinary urge incontinence in older adult women by informing and guiding evaluation, implementation, and dissemination.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

25

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, Estados Unidos, 84112
        • University of Utah

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

55 años a 105 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

The following eligibility criteria must be met for the potential participant to be considered for enrollment.

  • The study is enrolling older adult women, with urinary urge incontinence.
  • They cannot be currently treating their urinary urge incontinence with medication as this will confound results.
  • Women who have attempted more extreme treatments and are still experiencing urinary urge incontinence will not be considered as potential participants, as it is unlikely that mindfulness-based stress reduction would treat urinary urge incontinence that is refractory to that degree.
  • Participants must be English speaking, as the interventions and homework will be delivered in English.
  • postmenopausal women
  • Urge predominant urinary incontinence, defined as score of ≥ 3 (moderate to severe urinary incontinence) on the Incontinence Severity Index
  • Urge predominant urinary incontinence as determined by question 3 on the 3 Incontinence Questions. The 3 Incontinence Questions has been shown to be a quick and accurate way of diagnosing stress, urge or mixed incontinence in most cases
  • Has experienced urinary urge incontinence symptoms for at least three months
  • Committed to attend 8 weekly sessions and one half day retreat between weeks 6 and 7
  • No pharmacologic therapy for urinary urge incontinence within three weeks of enrollment and no plan to initiate such medications during the 8 week active treatment
  • If on hormone therapy or vaginal estrogen, plan to remain on it for the duration of the study; if not on it, no plan to initiate
  • No previous intradetrusor Botox injection for urinary urge incontinence and no plan to receive it during the intervention
  • No previous neurostimulation for urinary urge incontinence and no plan to receive it during the intervention English speaking
  • A score of >24 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

The following exclusions are applied, as they could seriously limit participation or confound participant response to the intervention:

  • Predominantly stress, mixed, or other type of incontinence as determined by question 3 on the 3 Incontinence Questions
  • Currently taking medications for Alzheimer's disease or other dementias; these medications could interfere with their participation
  • Known neurologic disease acknowledged to impact bladder function including Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, or stroke affecting urinary control; these diseases provide cause for urinary urge incontinence and as such the participant would be unlikely to benefit from the intervention
  • Current symptomatic urinary tract infection that has not resolved prior to the start of intervention
  • Current bladder infection that has not resolved prior to the start of intervention
  • Use of an assistive device for ambulation (such as a cane, walker, or wheelchair) and feels that difficulties with bladder management are related to the slowed time in visiting the restroom ("Was urinary urge incontinence a problem before you began using the assistive device?")
  • Functionally incontinent, in other words, having a mental or physical condition that prevents a person from visiting the restroom in time
  • Ever diagnosed with interstitial cystitis
  • Self-report of vaginal bulge protruding outside of the vagina
  • Past participation in a formal program of mindfulness-based stress reduction
  • Substantial, uncorrected hearing loss
  • Substantial, uncorrected vision loss
  • Limitations that preclude completing study questionnaires or surveys, such as difficulties with reading and writing or a cognitive impairment

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction
8 week manualized, standardized mindfulness-based stress reduction program taught by a certified Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction instructor
This experimental arm presents the actual Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program as developed in the late seventies and early eighties in its original eight week format
Comparador activo: Health Enhancement Program
8 week manualized, standardized health enhancement program, taught by a certified health education specialist
This active comparison arm presents the official Health Enhancement Program in its eight week format as developed by MacCoon in 2009.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Number of potential participants contacted
Periodo de tiempo: 10 weeks
number of people who contacted PI during recruitment process, including the place they heard about the study
10 weeks
number of enrolled participants completing the study
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks
number of participants who attended at least five of nine classes number of excused absences number of unexcused absences
12 weeks
percentage of course content delivered during intervention
Periodo de tiempo: 44 weeks
weekly interventionist report on what was taught participants perception of course content delivered measured by a checklist of concepts covered in the weekly interventions at study completion
44 weeks
positive or negative coded responses to the question "How did it go today?"
Periodo de tiempo: 8 weeks
data coded from two participants' responses after each class in each arm
8 weeks
number of participants who completed each week's homework practice
Periodo de tiempo: 8 weeks
participants mark on homework practice log and submit weekly
8 weeks
number of participants recruited for enrollment
Periodo de tiempo: 10 weeks
potential participants who were interested in the study
10 weeks
number of potential participants who are eligible to enroll
Periodo de tiempo: 10 weeks
number of people who passed the screening process via calls or emails
10 weeks
consent rate
Periodo de tiempo: 10 weeks
number of participants who are willing to sign consent document at enrollment interview; number who pass the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and are willing to sign consent document
10 weeks
number of participants enrolled
Periodo de tiempo: 10 weeks
number of people who enrolled into the study
10 weeks
number of dropouts due to stated distress from or dislike of either intervention experience (as opposed to someone needing to withdraw due to a family emergency or illness)
Periodo de tiempo: 8 weeks
participant self-report of what made the intervention challenging - why they were unable or unwilling to complete the course
8 weeks
- number of minutes of homework practice each week
Periodo de tiempo: 8 weeks
totaled from daily numbers reported by participant
8 weeks

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
change in symptom severity
Periodo de tiempo: 16 weeks, 6 months
measured by the Incontinence Severity Index
16 weeks, 6 months
change in symptom bother
Periodo de tiempo: 16 weeks, 6 months
measured by the Overactive Bladder questionnaire, short form
16 weeks, 6 months
change in perceived stress
Periodo de tiempo: 16 weeks, 6 months
measured by the Perceived Stress Scale
16 weeks, 6 months
change in perceived self-efficacy
Periodo de tiempo: 16 weeks, 6 months
measured by the Geriatric Self Efficacy Index for Urinary Incontinence
16 weeks, 6 months
self report of rate and trajectory of change in participant impression of improvement
Periodo de tiempo: 16 weeks, 6 months
measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement
16 weeks, 6 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Katarina F Felsted, MS, University of Utah

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

3 de febrero de 2017

Finalización primaria (Actual)

12 de abril de 2018

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

12 de abril de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

27 de abril de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de junio de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

6 de junio de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

15 de febrero de 2019

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

11 de febrero de 2019

Última verificación

1 de febrero de 2019

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction

3
Suscribir