Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

More-2-Eat Phase 2: Scaling and Spread of the Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care

9 de febrero de 2020 actualizado por: Heather Keller, University of Waterloo

More-2-Eat Phase 2: Spread/Scaling up Improved Nutrition Care to Detect and Treat Hospital Malnutrition.

More-2-Eat Phase 2 provides the opportunity to extend the implementation of the Integrated Nutrition Pathway to a total of 10 hospitals and more than 20 medical/surgical units. Building on the success of More-2-Eat Phase 1, key components of this implementation study will be a registry for self-managed data entry and reports and a community of practice to support implementation of nutrition screening at admission to hospital, subjective global assessment to diagnose and triage patients to care pathways and medication pass of a small amount of nutrient dense oral nutritional supplement. Success with implementation and impact on key patient outcomes will be determined.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

Malnutrition in hospital patients is a growing problem, with 20-45% of patients already malnourished at admission. As 70% of malnourished patients are also frail, early detection and treatment of malnutrition is one way to improve the outcomes of frail older adults. To improve the detection and treatment of these conditions, the PI developed the Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (INPAC) that guides hospital staff on when to conduct key nutrition care activities to improve outcomes (e.g. screening at admission).

In More-2-Eat (April 2015-March 2017), 5 Canadian hospital units in 4 provinces received funding to implement INPAC. Each hospital, with support from a research team had 1 year to implement INPAC. All 5 hospitals were successful in improving detection and treatment of malnutrition, and started to screen for frailty. Clinical care was transformed in the study units; for example all sites progressed from low baseline or no screening at admission to a rate of 75%. Findings also demonstrate improvement in clinical outcomes such as a shorter length of stay. An online INPAC Implementation Toolkit was developed to promote mobilization of this knowledge. What is not known is whether or not the results can be replicated under normal circumstances (i.e., no external funding for implementation at a hospital site).

To sustain and expand on this success, a Phase 2 knowledge translation project is proposed that will involve the five original Phase 1 sites and five further hospitals as Phase 2 sites. The goal of the second phase is to see if Phase 1 sites can spread success to other units within their hospitals and if Phase 2 sites can achieve similar results across a broader group of patients.

The end product will be a sustainable model including a community of practice supported by our partner the Canadian Malnutrition Task Force, and a self-serve registry that allows sites to collect and report data to change their practice. Investigators will also confirm capacity of INPAC activities to improve clinical outcomes across diverse settings. This knowledge translation and implementation study will demonstrate the potential to transform clinical nutrition care, benefiting all pre-frail and frail older adults.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

5158

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canadá
        • Royal Alexander Hospital
    • Manitoba
      • Brandon, Manitoba, Canadá
        • Brandon Regional Health Centre
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canadá
        • Concordia Hospital
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canadá
        • Victoria General Hospital
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canadá
        • London Health Sciences Centre
      • Napanee, Ontario, Canadá
        • Lennox Addington County General Hospital
      • Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canadá
        • Niagara Health Systems
      • Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canadá
        • Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
    • Saskatchewan
      • Regina, Saskatchewan, Canadá
        • Pasqua Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

all patients admitted to study units in one of the 10 hospitals included will be subject to the improved nutrition care processes; those that are malnourished will be offered a variety of treatments including medication pass

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient on the study unit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients not on the study unit

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Modelos observacionales: Otro
  • Perspectivas temporales: Futuro

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
Royal Alexandria
Administrative records
algorithm to guide care processes with respect to nutrition e.g. screening on admission, diagnosis with subjective global assessment, early treatment with medication pass of oral nutritional supplement
Pasqua Regional hospital
Administrative records
algorithm to guide care processes with respect to nutrition e.g. screening on admission, diagnosis with subjective global assessment, early treatment with medication pass of oral nutritional supplement
Concordia Hospital
Administrative records
algorithm to guide care processes with respect to nutrition e.g. screening on admission, diagnosis with subjective global assessment, early treatment with medication pass of oral nutritional supplement
Niagara General Hospital
Administrative records
algorithm to guide care processes with respect to nutrition e.g. screening on admission, diagnosis with subjective global assessment, early treatment with medication pass of oral nutritional supplement
Hospital 6
Administrative Records
algorithm to guide care processes with respect to nutrition e.g. screening on admission, diagnosis with subjective global assessment, early treatment with medication pass of oral nutritional supplement
Hospital 7
Administrative Records
algorithm to guide care processes with respect to nutrition e.g. screening on admission, diagnosis with subjective global assessment, early treatment with medication pass of oral nutritional supplement
Hospital 8
Administrative Records
algorithm to guide care processes with respect to nutrition e.g. screening on admission, diagnosis with subjective global assessment, early treatment with medication pass of oral nutritional supplement
Hospital 9
Administrative Records
algorithm to guide care processes with respect to nutrition e.g. screening on admission, diagnosis with subjective global assessment, early treatment with medication pass of oral nutritional supplement
Hospital 10
Administrative records
algorithm to guide care processes with respect to nutrition e.g. screening on admission, diagnosis with subjective global assessment, early treatment with medication pass of oral nutritional supplement

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
success with implementation
Periodo de tiempo: 19 months
rates of screening, diagnosis and treatment with medication pass per month of the study
19 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Adverse events while in hospital (fall, new infection etc.)
Periodo de tiempo: 19 months
19 months
Length of stay
Periodo de tiempo: 19 months
Average length of stay for patients admitted to the study unit; monthly average
19 months
Readmission rate
Periodo de tiempo: 19 months
number of patients per month discharged and readmitted to the hospital within 30 days
19 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Heather Keller, PhD, University of Waterloo

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2018

Finalización primaria (Actual)

30 de diciembre de 2019

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

31 de diciembre de 2019

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

1 de enero de 2018

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

1 de enero de 2018

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

5 de enero de 2018

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de febrero de 2020

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de febrero de 2020

Última verificación

1 de febrero de 2020

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • KT2017-01

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

Sí

Descripción del plan IPD

UWSpace at the University of Waterloo

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

2020

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • Código analítico

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir