Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

AI-Supported and Traditional Tennis Training in Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities (TENN-ID)

4 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Tennis Learning Experiences of Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities: A Comparative Analysis of Technology-Supported and Traditional Approaches

This study aims to examine the tennis learning experiences of children with mild intellectual disabilities aged 12-18 years by comparing a real-time pose recognition technology-supported teaching approach with a traditional face-to-face instructional method. The research focuses on how participants experience these two different teaching approaches and how these approaches influence their learning process in basic tennis skills.

A total of 30 participants will be included and divided into two groups: one group will receive tennis instruction supported by real-time pose recognition technology, and the other group will receive traditional instructor-led training. The intervention will last for 14 weeks and will focus on teaching basic tennis skills such as forehand and backhand strokes.

The study seeks to answer the following questions: How do children with mild intellectual disabilities experience technology-supported versus traditional tennis instruction? What differences exist between the two approaches in terms of learning experience, engagement, and motor skill development?

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

This study is designed as a qualitative and comparative investigation examining the learning experiences of children with mild intellectual disabilities aged 12-18 in acquiring basic tennis skills through two different instructional approaches: a real-time pose recognition technology-supported method and a traditional face-to-face teaching method.

The technology-supported intervention will be implemented using a real-time pose estimation system based on the MediaPipe framework. This system provides immediate visual feedback by analyzing participants' body movements and identifying deviations from correct movement patterns. In the traditional instruction group, teacher-centered methods such as demonstration, verbal explanation, and corrective feedback will be used.

The intervention will last for 14 weeks, with training sessions conducted three days per week for 45 minutes each. The instructional content is structured into two phases: the first seven weeks will focus on forehand stroke development, while the remaining seven weeks will focus on backhand stroke acquisition. Both groups will aim to develop fundamental tennis motor skills appropriate for beginners with intellectual disabilities.

Data will be collected through a socio-demographic information form, semi-structured interviews, and field notes. Interviews will be conducted at multiple stages of the intervention (week 7, week 14, and post-intervention) to explore participants' learning experiences, perceptions of the instructional methods, motivation levels, and challenges encountered during the learning process.

Qualitative data will be analyzed using content analysis. Codes and themes will be generated to compare learning experiences across the two instructional approaches. The study aims to provide an in-depth understanding of how technology-supported instruction influences motor skill acquisition and engagement in physical education settings for individuals with mild intellectual disabilities.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

30

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Burdur
      • Burdur, Burdur, Turquía (Türkiye), 15200
        • Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, School of Sport Sciences

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 12-18 years
  • Diagnosed with mild intellectual disability
  • Willing to participate voluntarily in the study
  • Able to attend regular training sessions (3 days per week for 14 weeks)
  • No severe physical condition preventing participation in physical activity
  • Right-hand dominant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Withdrawal of consent by participant or legal guardian
  • Irregular attendance in training sessions or inability to complete the intervention program
  • Missing at least one of the scheduled interview sessions
  • Presence of severe physical or medical conditions that may limit participation in tennis activities
  • Inability to follow basic instructions during training sessions

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Technology-Supported Tennis Training
Participants receive tennis instruction supported by real-time pose recognition technology. The system provides immediate visual feedback on body positioning and movement accuracy during forehand and backhand skill acquisition. Instruction focuses on correcting movement patterns and enhancing motor learning through augmented feedback.
Participants receive tennis instruction supported by a real-time pose recognition system (MediaPipe-based). The system provides immediate visual feedback on body posture and movement accuracy during forehand and backhand skill acquisition. Instruction aims to enhance motor learning through augmented feedback and movement correction.
Comparador activo: Traditional Tennis Training
Participants receive standard teacher-led tennis instruction without technological assistance. Training includes demonstration, verbal explanation, repetition, and corrective feedback provided directly by the instructor during forehand and backhand skill practice.
Participants receive standard face-to-face tennis instruction without technological support. Teaching includes instructor demonstration, verbal explanation, repetition, and corrective feedback during forehand and backhand skill practice.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Learning Experience During Tennis Instruction
Periodo de tiempo: Week 7, Week 14, and Week 15
Participants' learning experiences during tennis skill acquisition (forehand and backhand) will be assessed through semi-structured interviews. The primary outcome is the qualitative description of how participants with mild intellectual disabilities perceive technology-supported and traditional tennis instruction in terms of ease of learning, understanding of movements, and perceived improvement.
Week 7, Week 14, and Week 15

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Perceived Motor Skill Development
Periodo de tiempo: Week 7, Week 14, and Week 15
Participants' perceived improvement in basic tennis motor skills (forehand and backhand) will be assessed through semi-structured interviews and field observations. Changes in perceived ability and confidence in performing movements will be analyzed qualitatively.
Week 7, Week 14, and Week 15

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

  • Ahuja, N. J., Dutt, S., Choudhary, S. L., & Kumar, M. (2025). Intelligent tutoring system in education for disabled learners using human-computer interaction and augmented reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(3), 1804-1816. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2124359. Alsolami, A. S. (2025). The effectiveness of using artificial intelligence in improving academic skills of school-aged students with mild intellectual disabilities in Saudi Arabia. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 156, 104884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104884 Chiu, T. K. (2024). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187-6203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861 Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. Siyasal kitabevi. Google AI. (2020). MediaPipe Iris: Real-time Iris Tracking & Depth Estimation https://ai.googleblog.com/2020/08/mediapipe-iris-real-time-iris-tracking.html sayfasından erişilmiştir. He, Q., Chen, H., & Mo, X. (2024). Practical application of interactive AI technology based on visual analysis in professional system of physical education in universities. Heliyon, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24627 Johnson, D. (2019). Adaptive Learning Systems and Personalized Education. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 1(1), 1-10. Klavina, A., Pérez-Fuster, P., Daems, J., Lyhne, C. N., Dervishi, E., Pajalic, Z., ... & Sousa, C. (2024). The use of assistive technology to promote practical skills in persons with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Digital Health, 10, 20552076241281260. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207624128126 Kulkarni, K. M., & Shenoy, S. (2021). Table tennis stroke recognition using two-dimensional human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on com

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

13 de octubre de 2025

Finalización primaria (Actual)

15 de enero de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

20 de enero de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

29 de abril de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

11 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 2026/2944
  • 1183-YL-25 (Otro identificador: Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Scientific Research Projects Unit (BAP))
  • Approval No: E-84459573-605-17 (Otro identificador: Turkish Ministry of Family and Social Services)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because this study involves minors and individuals with intellectual disabilities, representing a vulnerable population that requires enhanced confidentiality protections. The dataset includes qualitative materials such as audio-recorded interviews, verbatim transcripts, observational field notes, and contextual narratives that may contain indirect identifiers. Given the small sample size and the rich descriptive nature of qualitative data, the risk of participant re-identification may remain even after de-identification procedures. Therefore, to ensure compliance with ethical approval requirements, informed consent commitments, and data protection principles, IPD will not be made publicly available.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir