Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Testing a Reading Module to Improve Reading Skills and Quality of Life in Glaucoma Patients

7 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Dr. Nur Izzati Binti Mohd Salim, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Evaluation of The Effectiveness Of Reading Rehabilitation Module On Reading Performance And Quality of Life In Patients With Glaucoma

The goal of this interventional study is to test the effectiveness of reading rehabilitation module towards reading speed and error, and quality of life in glaucoma patients.The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Is there a significant difference in reading speed over a 6-month period between glaucoma patients who undergo a reading rehabilitation module and those who receive standard care?
  2. To what extent does the implementation of a reading rehabilitation module reduce the frequency of reading errors in glaucoma patients compared to a control group across baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups?
  3. How does a structured reading rehabilitation module influence the self-reported quality of life in glaucoma patients from baseline to 6 months when compared to those receiving standard care?

Participants will:

Patients in interventional group will be instructed to practice the reading module for 20-30 minutes daily, minimum 3 days/week, for 6 months.

Visit the clinic once every 3 months for checkups and tests A logbook will be provided to record their practice sessions.

While participants in control group will receive standard care, visit the clinic once every 3 months for checkups and tests.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible visual field loss, significantly impairing reading efficiency and vision-related quality of life. While conventional management focuses on intraocular pressure reduction to prevent disease progression, visual rehabilitation strategies targeting functional reading deficits remain limited in clinical practice. This randomized, single-blind, parallel-group control trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, home-based reading rehabilitation module on reading performance and vision-related quality of life in patients with bilateral glaucoma.

Following ethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of Universiti Sains Malaysia (JPeM), eligible patients attending the Ophthalmology Clinic at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) will be recruited and randomized into two arms: an intervention group receiving the reading rehabilitation module or a control group maintaining standard daily care (waitlist control). Randomization will be executed using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE) to maintain allocation concealment.

Participants assigned to the intervention arm will receive standardized Malay-language narrative reading materials and will be instructed to practice the structured reading module at home for 20 to 30 minutes every 2-3days per week over a 6-month study period. Protocol adherence will be monitored using daily reading logs tracking session dates and durations, which will be audited during monthly follow-up visits. Participants maintaining less than 80% compliance will receive targeted counseling. Control group participants will receive standard clinical care and general visual health advice, with access to the rehabilitation materials offered upon completion of the 6-month trial.

Study assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months post-enrollment by an independent investigator blinded to group allocation. Reading performance metrics (reading speed in words per minute and error rate percentage) will be evaluated using the standardized Buari-Chen Malay Reading Chart at a 40 cm reading distance. Vision-related quality of life will be measured at baseline and 6 months using the validated, glaucoma-specific GLAUQOL-36 questionnaire (scored from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better quality of life). Data will be analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA) to evaluate time, group, and interaction effects across study visits.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

100

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

  • Nombre: Liza Sharmini Binti Tajudin Prof
  • Número de teléfono: +6019-9179227
  • Correo electrónico: liza@usm.my

Ubicaciones de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18- 80 years old.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of bilateral Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG),Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (PACG), Normotensive Glaucoma (NTG) and Juvenile Open Angle Glaucoma (JOAG).
  • Bilateral visual acuity of 6/60 and better.
  • Bilateral visual field defect more than 10degree from fixation.
  • Phakic without visually significant cataract.
  • Pseudophakic for more than 3 months prior to recruitment.
  • Literate patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular diseases other than glaucoma (e.g., age-related macula degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, moderate to severe cataract).
  • Other comorbidities that affect memory (e.g., stroke, cognitive disorders).
  • Cognitive disorders (e.g., diagnosed dementia or cognitive impairment).
  • Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia.
  • Other media opacities.
  • History of previous intraocular surgery other than uncomplicated cataract within past 6 months.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación cruzada
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Sin intervención: Standard Care Group
Group B patient will not be practicing reading rehabilitation module and will receive standard eye care.
Experimental: Reading Module Group
Group A is the interventional group. Group A patients will be practicing reading rehabilitation module.
Interventional group will be practicing reading rehabilitation module
Otros nombres:
  • Grupo A

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in Reading speed
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3rd month and 6th month
Reading speed will be assessed using the Buari-Chen Malay Reading Chart at a 40 cm reading distance. Participants read a standardized paragraph aloud. Reading speed is calculated as: Reading Speed (wpm)= (Total words read correctly} / Total time in seconds) x 60.
Baseline, 3rd month and 6th month
Change in Reading error
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline, 3rd month and 6th month
Reading errors (omissions, substitutions, mispronunciations, or skipped words) will be recorded using the Buari-Chen Malay Reading Chart. The error rate is calculated as: Error Rate (%) = (Number of Errors / Total Words) x 100.
At baseline, 3rd month and 6th month
GlauQol-36 Questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline and 6th month
Vision-related quality of life will be evaluated using the Glaucoma Quality of Life 36-item Questionnaire (GLAUQOL-36). The questionnaire covers 10 visual domains on a Likert scale. Individual item responses are aggregated and converted to a total standardized score ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a better vision-related quality of life.
At baseline and 6th month

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Silla de estudio: Mr. Mohd Bazlan Hafidz Mukrim Mohd Bazlan, Human Research Ethics Committee USM Division of Research & Innovation

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de septiembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

28 de febrero de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

28 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

3 de agosto de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

12 de agosto de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

7 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • USM/JEPeM/KK/26060515

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

De-identified individual participant data (including baseline demographics, visual acuity outcomes, reading performance metrics, and compliance logs) will be made available upon reasonable request. Data will be shared with qualified academic researchers following the publication of the primary thesis results, subject to approval by the principal investigator and institutional ethics committee. Data will be shared via secure email transmission.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Supporting documents and de-identified IPD will become available starting 6 months following the official publication of the thesis or primary journal manuscript, and will remain available for up to 5 years.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Access will be granted to qualified academic researchers, clinicians, and statistical meta-analysts affiliated with recognized research or academic institutions who present a scientifically sound proposal.

Requesters will be able to access the de-identified individual participant dataset (IPD) containing baseline demographics, clinical reading metrics, and adherence logs, as well as supporting documents including the Study Protocol and blank Informed Consent Form (ICF).

Interested researchers must submit a formal request and a brief research plan directly to the Principal Investigator via institutional email. Data will be transmitted securely (e.g., encrypted file transfer) once the proposal is reviewed and a standard Data Use Agreement (DUA) is signed by both parties.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • CIF

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir