- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT02096445
Neurocognitive Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Hand Function After Stroke
9 juin 2017 mis à jour par: Roger Gassert
The aim of this project is to clinically evaluate a novel robot-assisted therapeutic approach to train sensorimotor hand function after stroke.
It combines the profound experience of the clinic Hildebrand in neurocognitive therapy - involving brain and mind in the task and training both the motor and the sensory system - with the advanced haptic robotic technology of the Rehabilitation Engineering Lab at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), allowing unmet interaction with the hand through the simulation of virtual objects with various mechanical properties.
In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 10 sub-acute stroke patients will receive four weeks of robotic therapy sessions, integrated seamlessly into their daily rehabilitation program, while 10 other patients will receive conventional therapy.
The investigators will assess baseline performance in an initial clinical and robotic assessment, with another assessment at the end of the four-week period, and in follow-ups four weeks and six months later.
The contents of the patient-tailored robotic therapy sessions will match those of the conventional therapy as closely as possible.
This study will demonstrate the feasibility of including robotic therapy of hand function into the daily rehabilitation program, and investigate the acceptance from patients and therapists.
The investigators expect increased training intensity during the robotic therapy session compared to conventional sessions with similar contents, as well as novel insights into the recovery process of both the motor and the sensory system during the four weeks of therapy, through advanced robotic assessments integrated into the training sessions.
This project is a first step towards making such robotic therapy available to patients as integration into the conventional individual therapy program (e.g. for self-training), and towards transferring this technology to the home environment.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
34
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Ticino
-
Brissago, Ticino, Suisse, 6614
- Clinica Hildebrand Centro di riabilitazione Brissago
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans à 90 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age between 18-90 years old
- hemisyndrome (central paralysis of the upper extremity, and all degrees of weakness: M0 - M5 on the paresis scale) as a result of a first stroke
- sub-acute lesion not more than 6 weeks post ictus
Exclusion Criteria:
- insufficient state of consciousness
- severe aphasia
- severe cognitive deficits
- severe pathologies of the upper extremity of traumatic or rheumatic nature
- severe pain in the affected arm
- Patients with pacemakers and other active implants
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Robot group
Receive robot-assisted neurocognitive therapy instead of conventional neurocognitive therapy. (4 x 45 min/week) |
2 degrees-of-freedom hand rehabilitation robot to train fine motor skills during grasping and forearm rotation.
Autres noms:
|
|
Comparateur actif: Control group
Receive dose-matched conventional neurocognitive therapy
|
Use sensory perception (tactile, proprioception but not vision!) to solve a by the therapist guided (passive) or patient controlled (active) therapy task, e.g.
discrimination/identification of different spring resistances, sponges, different sized blocks, etc.
Autres noms:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Délai: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
|
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Délai: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
|
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Délai: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
|
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months
|
|
Functional improvement in dexterity
Délai: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
|
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
|
Functional improvement in dexterity
Délai: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
|
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
|
Functional improvement in dexterity
Délai: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months
|
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
|
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months
|
|
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Délai: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
|
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
|
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Délai: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
|
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
|
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Délai: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 6 months
|
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
|
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 6 months
|
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Délai: Change from Baseline in Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC (Medical Center) Nottingham Sensory Assessment
|
Change from Baseline in Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Délai: Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment
|
Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Délai: Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 6 months
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment
|
Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 6 months
|
|
Neglect
Délai: Change from Baseline in neglect at 4 weeks
|
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
|
Change from Baseline in neglect at 4 weeks
|
|
Neglect
Délai: Change from Baseline in neglect at 8 weeks
|
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
|
Change from Baseline in neglect at 8 weeks
|
|
Neglect
Délai: Change from Baseline in neglect at 6 months
|
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
|
Change from Baseline in neglect at 6 months
|
|
Cognitive impairment
Délai: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 4 weeks
|
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
|
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 4 weeks
|
|
Cognitive impairment
Délai: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 8 weeks
|
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
|
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 8 weeks
|
|
Cognitive impairment
Délai: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 6 months
|
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
|
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 6 months
|
|
Frontal lobe function
Délai: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 4 weeks
|
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
|
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 4 weeks
|
|
Frontal lobe function
Délai: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 8 weeks
|
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
|
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 8 weeks
|
|
Frontal lobe function
Délai: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 6 months
|
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
|
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 6 months
|
|
Aphasia
Délai: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 4 weeks
|
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
|
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 4 weeks
|
|
Aphasia
Délai: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 8 weeks
|
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
|
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 8 weeks
|
|
Aphasia
Délai: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 6 months
|
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
|
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 6 months
|
|
Attention
Délai: Change from Baseline in attention at 4 weeks
|
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
|
Change from Baseline in attention at 4 weeks
|
|
Attention
Délai: Change from Baseline in attention at 8 weeks
|
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
|
Change from Baseline in attention at 8 weeks
|
|
Attention
Délai: Change from Baseline in attention at 6 months
|
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
|
Change from Baseline in attention at 6 months
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Directeur d'études: Roger Gassert, Prof. Dr., Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, ETH Zurich
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Metzger JC, Lambercy O, Califfi A, Conti FM, Gassert R. Neurocognitive robot-assisted therapy of hand function. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014 Apr-Jun;7(2):140-9. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2013.72.
- Ranzani R, Lambercy O, Metzger JC, Califfi A, Regazzi S, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, Rossi P, Conti FM, Gassert R. Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 24;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7.
- Metzger JC, Lambercy O, Califfi A, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, Rossi P, Conti FM, Gassert R. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Nov 15;11:154. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-154.
Liens utiles
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
1 avril 2013
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
10 mars 2017
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
9 juin 2017
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
19 mars 2014
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
21 mars 2014
Première publication (Estimation)
26 mars 2014
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
12 juin 2017
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
9 juin 2017
Dernière vérification
1 juin 2017
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- CIV-13-02-009921
- 2013-MD-0002 (Autre identifiant: Swissmedic)
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .