Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Neurocognitive Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Hand Function After Stroke

9 de junio de 2017 actualizado por: Roger Gassert
The aim of this project is to clinically evaluate a novel robot-assisted therapeutic approach to train sensorimotor hand function after stroke. It combines the profound experience of the clinic Hildebrand in neurocognitive therapy - involving brain and mind in the task and training both the motor and the sensory system - with the advanced haptic robotic technology of the Rehabilitation Engineering Lab at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), allowing unmet interaction with the hand through the simulation of virtual objects with various mechanical properties. In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 10 sub-acute stroke patients will receive four weeks of robotic therapy sessions, integrated seamlessly into their daily rehabilitation program, while 10 other patients will receive conventional therapy. The investigators will assess baseline performance in an initial clinical and robotic assessment, with another assessment at the end of the four-week period, and in follow-ups four weeks and six months later. The contents of the patient-tailored robotic therapy sessions will match those of the conventional therapy as closely as possible. This study will demonstrate the feasibility of including robotic therapy of hand function into the daily rehabilitation program, and investigate the acceptance from patients and therapists. The investigators expect increased training intensity during the robotic therapy session compared to conventional sessions with similar contents, as well as novel insights into the recovery process of both the motor and the sensory system during the four weeks of therapy, through advanced robotic assessments integrated into the training sessions. This project is a first step towards making such robotic therapy available to patients as integration into the conventional individual therapy program (e.g. for self-training), and towards transferring this technology to the home environment.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

34

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Ticino
      • Brissago, Ticino, Suiza, 6614
        • Clinica Hildebrand Centro di riabilitazione Brissago

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 90 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 18-90 years old
  • hemisyndrome (central paralysis of the upper extremity, and all degrees of weakness: M0 - M5 on the paresis scale) as a result of a first stroke
  • sub-acute lesion not more than 6 weeks post ictus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • insufficient state of consciousness
  • severe aphasia
  • severe cognitive deficits
  • severe pathologies of the upper extremity of traumatic or rheumatic nature
  • severe pain in the affected arm
  • Patients with pacemakers and other active implants

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Robot group

Receive robot-assisted neurocognitive therapy instead of conventional neurocognitive therapy.

(4 x 45 min/week)

2 degrees-of-freedom hand rehabilitation robot to train fine motor skills during grasping and forearm rotation.
Otros nombres:
  • Rehabilitation robot ReHapticKnob
Comparador activo: Control group
Receive dose-matched conventional neurocognitive therapy
Use sensory perception (tactile, proprioception but not vision!) to solve a by the therapist guided (passive) or patient controlled (active) therapy task, e.g. discrimination/identification of different spring resistances, sponges, different sized blocks, etc.
Otros nombres:
  • Perfetti-concept

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months
Functional improvement in dexterity
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 6 months
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 6 months
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC (Medical Center) Nottingham Sensory Assessment
Change from Baseline in Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment
Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 6 months
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment
Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 6 months
Neglect
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in neglect at 4 weeks
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
Change from Baseline in neglect at 4 weeks
Neglect
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in neglect at 8 weeks
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
Change from Baseline in neglect at 8 weeks
Neglect
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in neglect at 6 months
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
Change from Baseline in neglect at 6 months
Cognitive impairment
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 4 weeks
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 4 weeks
Cognitive impairment
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 8 weeks
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 8 weeks
Cognitive impairment
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 6 months
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 6 months
Frontal lobe function
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 4 weeks
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 4 weeks
Frontal lobe function
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 8 weeks
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 8 weeks
Frontal lobe function
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 6 months
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 6 months
Aphasia
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 4 weeks
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 4 weeks
Aphasia
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 8 weeks
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 8 weeks
Aphasia
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 6 months
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 6 months
Attention
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in attention at 4 weeks
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
Change from Baseline in attention at 4 weeks
Attention
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in attention at 8 weeks
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
Change from Baseline in attention at 8 weeks
Attention
Periodo de tiempo: Change from Baseline in attention at 6 months
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
Change from Baseline in attention at 6 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: Roger Gassert, Prof. Dr., Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, ETH Zurich

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de abril de 2013

Finalización primaria (Actual)

10 de marzo de 2017

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

9 de junio de 2017

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

19 de marzo de 2014

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

21 de marzo de 2014

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

26 de marzo de 2014

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

12 de junio de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de junio de 2017

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2017

Más información

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir