Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Neurocognitive Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Hand Function After Stroke

9. Juni 2017 aktualisiert von: Roger Gassert
The aim of this project is to clinically evaluate a novel robot-assisted therapeutic approach to train sensorimotor hand function after stroke. It combines the profound experience of the clinic Hildebrand in neurocognitive therapy - involving brain and mind in the task and training both the motor and the sensory system - with the advanced haptic robotic technology of the Rehabilitation Engineering Lab at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), allowing unmet interaction with the hand through the simulation of virtual objects with various mechanical properties. In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 10 sub-acute stroke patients will receive four weeks of robotic therapy sessions, integrated seamlessly into their daily rehabilitation program, while 10 other patients will receive conventional therapy. The investigators will assess baseline performance in an initial clinical and robotic assessment, with another assessment at the end of the four-week period, and in follow-ups four weeks and six months later. The contents of the patient-tailored robotic therapy sessions will match those of the conventional therapy as closely as possible. This study will demonstrate the feasibility of including robotic therapy of hand function into the daily rehabilitation program, and investigate the acceptance from patients and therapists. The investigators expect increased training intensity during the robotic therapy session compared to conventional sessions with similar contents, as well as novel insights into the recovery process of both the motor and the sensory system during the four weeks of therapy, through advanced robotic assessments integrated into the training sessions. This project is a first step towards making such robotic therapy available to patients as integration into the conventional individual therapy program (e.g. for self-training), and towards transferring this technology to the home environment.

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

34

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Ticino
      • Brissago, Ticino, Schweiz, 6614
        • Clinica Hildebrand Centro di riabilitazione Brissago

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 90 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 18-90 years old
  • hemisyndrome (central paralysis of the upper extremity, and all degrees of weakness: M0 - M5 on the paresis scale) as a result of a first stroke
  • sub-acute lesion not more than 6 weeks post ictus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • insufficient state of consciousness
  • severe aphasia
  • severe cognitive deficits
  • severe pathologies of the upper extremity of traumatic or rheumatic nature
  • severe pain in the affected arm
  • Patients with pacemakers and other active implants

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Robot group

Receive robot-assisted neurocognitive therapy instead of conventional neurocognitive therapy.

(4 x 45 min/week)

2 degrees-of-freedom hand rehabilitation robot to train fine motor skills during grasping and forearm rotation.
Andere Namen:
  • Rehabilitation robot ReHapticKnob
Aktiver Komparator: Control group
Receive dose-matched conventional neurocognitive therapy
Use sensory perception (tactile, proprioception but not vision!) to solve a by the therapist guided (passive) or patient controlled (active) therapy task, e.g. discrimination/identification of different spring resistances, sponges, different sized blocks, etc.
Andere Namen:
  • Perfetti-concept

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months
Functional improvement in dexterity
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Functional improvement in dexterity
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 6 months
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 6 months
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC (Medical Center) Nottingham Sensory Assessment
Change from Baseline in Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 4 weeks
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment
Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 8 weeks
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 6 months
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment
Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 6 months
Neglect
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in neglect at 4 weeks
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
Change from Baseline in neglect at 4 weeks
Neglect
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in neglect at 8 weeks
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
Change from Baseline in neglect at 8 weeks
Neglect
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in neglect at 6 months
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
Change from Baseline in neglect at 6 months
Cognitive impairment
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 4 weeks
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 4 weeks
Cognitive impairment
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 8 weeks
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 8 weeks
Cognitive impairment
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 6 months
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 6 months
Frontal lobe function
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 4 weeks
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 4 weeks
Frontal lobe function
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 8 weeks
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 8 weeks
Frontal lobe function
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 6 months
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 6 months
Aphasia
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 4 weeks
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 4 weeks
Aphasia
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 8 weeks
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 8 weeks
Aphasia
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 6 months
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 6 months
Attention
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in attention at 4 weeks
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
Change from Baseline in attention at 4 weeks
Attention
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in attention at 8 weeks
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
Change from Baseline in attention at 8 weeks
Attention
Zeitfenster: Change from Baseline in attention at 6 months
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
Change from Baseline in attention at 6 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ermittler

  • Studienleiter: Roger Gassert, Prof. Dr., Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, ETH Zurich

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. April 2013

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

10. März 2017

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

9. Juni 2017

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

19. März 2014

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

21. März 2014

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

26. März 2014

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

12. Juni 2017

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

9. Juni 2017

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2017

Mehr Informationen

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren