- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT02096445
Neurocognitive Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Hand Function After Stroke
9. juni 2017 oppdatert av: Roger Gassert
The aim of this project is to clinically evaluate a novel robot-assisted therapeutic approach to train sensorimotor hand function after stroke.
It combines the profound experience of the clinic Hildebrand in neurocognitive therapy - involving brain and mind in the task and training both the motor and the sensory system - with the advanced haptic robotic technology of the Rehabilitation Engineering Lab at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), allowing unmet interaction with the hand through the simulation of virtual objects with various mechanical properties.
In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 10 sub-acute stroke patients will receive four weeks of robotic therapy sessions, integrated seamlessly into their daily rehabilitation program, while 10 other patients will receive conventional therapy.
The investigators will assess baseline performance in an initial clinical and robotic assessment, with another assessment at the end of the four-week period, and in follow-ups four weeks and six months later.
The contents of the patient-tailored robotic therapy sessions will match those of the conventional therapy as closely as possible.
This study will demonstrate the feasibility of including robotic therapy of hand function into the daily rehabilitation program, and investigate the acceptance from patients and therapists.
The investigators expect increased training intensity during the robotic therapy session compared to conventional sessions with similar contents, as well as novel insights into the recovery process of both the motor and the sensory system during the four weeks of therapy, through advanced robotic assessments integrated into the training sessions.
This project is a first step towards making such robotic therapy available to patients as integration into the conventional individual therapy program (e.g. for self-training), and towards transferring this technology to the home environment.
Studieoversikt
Status
Fullført
Forhold
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Faktiske)
34
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
Ticino
-
Brissago, Ticino, Sveits, 6614
- Clinica Hildebrand Centro di riabilitazione Brissago
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
18 år til 90 år (Voksen, Eldre voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- age between 18-90 years old
- hemisyndrome (central paralysis of the upper extremity, and all degrees of weakness: M0 - M5 on the paresis scale) as a result of a first stroke
- sub-acute lesion not more than 6 weeks post ictus
Exclusion Criteria:
- insufficient state of consciousness
- severe aphasia
- severe cognitive deficits
- severe pathologies of the upper extremity of traumatic or rheumatic nature
- severe pain in the affected arm
- Patients with pacemakers and other active implants
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Enkelt
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Robot group
Receive robot-assisted neurocognitive therapy instead of conventional neurocognitive therapy. (4 x 45 min/week) |
2 degrees-of-freedom hand rehabilitation robot to train fine motor skills during grasping and forearm rotation.
Andre navn:
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Control group
Receive dose-matched conventional neurocognitive therapy
|
Use sensory perception (tactile, proprioception but not vision!) to solve a by the therapist guided (passive) or patient controlled (active) therapy task, e.g.
discrimination/identification of different spring resistances, sponges, different sized blocks, etc.
Andre navn:
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
|
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
|
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months
|
Motor impairment of the upper limb is measured by the means of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale of the upper limb (total of 66 points)
|
Change from Baseline in motor impairment of the upper limb at 6 months
|
|
Functional improvement in dexterity
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
|
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
|
Functional improvement in dexterity
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
|
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
|
Functional improvement in dexterity
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months
|
Functional improvement in dexterity is assessed with the Box and Block Test
|
Change from Baseline in functional improvement of dexterity of the upper limb at 6 months
|
|
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
|
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
|
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
|
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
|
Spasticity level of the upper limb
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 6 months
|
Spasticity level is measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale
|
Change from Baseline in spasticity level of the upper limb at 6 months
|
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC (Medical Center) Nottingham Sensory Assessment
|
Change from Baseline in Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 4 weeks
|
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment
|
Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 8 weeks
|
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 6 months
|
Tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb is assessed with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment
|
Change from Baseline in tactile and proprioceptive sensory function of the upper limb at 6 months
|
|
Neglect
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in neglect at 4 weeks
|
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
|
Change from Baseline in neglect at 4 weeks
|
|
Neglect
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in neglect at 8 weeks
|
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
|
Change from Baseline in neglect at 8 weeks
|
|
Neglect
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in neglect at 6 months
|
Neglect is assessed with the Albert's test of neglect
|
Change from Baseline in neglect at 6 months
|
|
Cognitive impairment
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 4 weeks
|
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
|
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 4 weeks
|
|
Cognitive impairment
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 8 weeks
|
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
|
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 8 weeks
|
|
Cognitive impairment
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 6 months
|
Cognitive impairment is assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination
|
Change from Baseline in cognitive impairment at 6 months
|
|
Frontal lobe function
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 4 weeks
|
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
|
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 4 weeks
|
|
Frontal lobe function
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 8 weeks
|
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
|
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 8 weeks
|
|
Frontal lobe function
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 6 months
|
Frontal lobe function is assessed with the Frontal assessment battery
|
Change from Baseline in frontal lobe function at 6 months
|
|
Aphasia
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 4 weeks
|
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
|
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 4 weeks
|
|
Aphasia
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 8 weeks
|
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
|
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 8 weeks
|
|
Aphasia
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in aphasia at 6 months
|
Aphasia is assessed with the Aachener Aphasia Test
|
Change from Baseline in aphasia at 6 months
|
|
Attention
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in attention at 4 weeks
|
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
|
Change from Baseline in attention at 4 weeks
|
|
Attention
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in attention at 8 weeks
|
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
|
Change from Baseline in attention at 8 weeks
|
|
Attention
Tidsramme: Change from Baseline in attention at 6 months
|
Attention is assessed with the test to identify attention
|
Change from Baseline in attention at 6 months
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Etterforskere
- Studieleder: Roger Gassert, Prof. Dr., Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, ETH Zurich
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.
Generelle publikasjoner
- Metzger JC, Lambercy O, Califfi A, Conti FM, Gassert R. Neurocognitive robot-assisted therapy of hand function. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2014 Apr-Jun;7(2):140-9. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2013.72.
- Ranzani R, Lambercy O, Metzger JC, Califfi A, Regazzi S, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, Rossi P, Conti FM, Gassert R. Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 24;17(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00746-7.
- Metzger JC, Lambercy O, Califfi A, Dinacci D, Petrillo C, Rossi P, Conti FM, Gassert R. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Nov 15;11:154. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-154.
Hjelpsomme linker
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
1. april 2013
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
10. mars 2017
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
9. juni 2017
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
19. mars 2014
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
21. mars 2014
Først lagt ut (Anslag)
26. mars 2014
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
12. juni 2017
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
9. juni 2017
Sist bekreftet
1. juni 2017
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- CIV-13-02-009921
- 2013-MD-0002 (Annen identifikator: Swissmedic)
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .