- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT02158741
Comparison Study of Usual Care vs. Usual Care Plus Community Intervention to Manage Type 2 Diabetes
28 août 2019 mis à jour par: Maureen Markle-Reid, McMaster University
A Client-Driven Intervention to Support Self-Management Among Community-Living Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Multiple Chronic Conditions
The overall purpose of this research is to examine and compare the effectiveness and costs of a community-based intervention to support self-management with usual primary care for older adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and multiple chronic conditions and their family caregivers.
Once the study is complete, the investigators will be able to determine if there is any measurable difference in self-care management between usual care plus the intervention versus usual care alone.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Research Goal
To examine the comparative effectiveness and costs of a community-based intervention to support self-management with usual primary care for older adults with T2DM and Multiple Chronic Conditions and their family caregivers.
Objectives
- To determine if a 6-month, IP, community-based intervention improve self-management compared with usual primary care services?
- To compare the effectiveness of the intervention on HRQoL, physical activity, nutritional status, depression, anxiety, diabetes parameters (blood glucose levels [HbA1c, hypoglycemic episodes]), diabetes-related complications, number of vascular events, social support number of falls, fall risk and medication safety with usual primary care services?
- To determine the effectiveness of the intervention on HRQoL of family caregivers compared with usual primary care?
- To assess whether or not the intervention improves clinical practice behaviours?
- To determine the 6-month costs of use of health services of the intervention compared with usual care, from a social perspective?
- To identify which subgroups of older adults with T2DM and MCC benefit most from the intervention?
- To determine the effectiveness of the intervention based on sex/gender and region?
- To determine the overall feasibility and acceptability of an IP community-based health promotion intervention and what can be identified as barriers and facilitators to implementation?
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
291
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Edmonton Oliver PCN
-
Leduc, Alberta, Canada, T9E 6W2
- Leduc Beaumont Devon PCN
-
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
- Sherwood Park PCN
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1
- McMaster University
-
Lindsay, Ontario, Canada
- Ross Memorial Hospital
-
London, Ontario, Canada
- St. Joseph's Health Care
-
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
- Peterborough Regional Health Centre
-
Port Hope, Ontario, Canada
- Port Hope Community Health Centre
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
65 ans et plus (Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- older adults aged 65+
- live in the local vicinity of a participating Diabetes Education Program
- were referred to their Diabetes Education Program within the past 24 months
- competence in English (or access to a translator)
- intention to continue living in the area for the next 6 months
- two reported chronic conditions in addition to T2DM. Individuals with newly diagnosed T2DM as well as those who were already receiving treatment for T2DM will be eligible for inclusion in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- score of 20 or less in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test AND without access to a substitute decision maker to sign consent (Score of 20 or less is not in itself an exclusion).
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Double
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Aucune intervention: Usual Primary Care
Usual Primary Care will be received by half the participants during the course of the Study
|
|
|
Comparateur actif: Home Visits and educational support
Intervention comprised of Home Visits and group educational sessions.
Home Visits and will be conducted by Diabetes Education staff in lieu of usual care conducted at the Diabetes clinic.
Lifestyle support and educational will be offered in the form of monthly Diabetes Wellness Days offered in the community where nutrition, exercise and support will be given to help improve self-management of diabetes.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities
Délai: Every two months from study onset until the end of study (6 months from baseline)
|
The SDSCA is a multidimensional measure of diabetes self-management with adequate internal and test-retest reliability, and evidence of validity and sensitivity to change.
The revised SDSCA consists of items that assess the following aspects of the diabetes regimen: general and specific diet, exercise, blood-glucose testing, foot care, and smoking.
Scores are calculated for each of these five regimen areas.
This data is collected by the interventionists at each visit.
|
Every two months from study onset until the end of study (6 months from baseline)
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
SF12v2
Délai: Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
|
This measurement is used to assess Health related quality of Life.
This survey consists of 12 questions that measure functional health and well-being from the client's perspective.
It provides scores for eight health domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health), and psychometrically-based physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores
|
Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
|
Autres mesures de résultats
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
CES-D-10
Délai: Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
|
The CES-D has been used in prior studies of older adults with mood disorders, and has a high degree of reliability, content, construct and criterion related validity, distinguishes between depressed and non-depressed people, and is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in depressive symptoms over time in psychiatric populations.
|
Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
|
|
GAD-7
Délai: Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
|
Prevalence and severity of anxiety, measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener
|
Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
|
|
Health Assessment forms
Délai: Baseline intervention interview, at 3 months and again at 6 months
|
• Diabetes parameters (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, hypoglycemic episodes), and presence of diabetes-related complications and comorbid chronic conditions, obtained from health assessment forms submitted by the Diabetes Education Program RN and RD after the first home visit and at 3 months and 6 months.
|
Baseline intervention interview, at 3 months and again at 6 months
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Maureen Markle-Reid, PhD, McMaster University
- Chercheur principal: Jenny Ploeg, PhD, McMaster University
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Markle-Reid M, Ploeg J, Valaitis R, Duggleby W, Fisher K, Fraser K, Ganann R, Griffith LE, Gruneir A, McAiney C, Williams A. Protocol for a program of research from the Aging, Community and Health Research Unit: Promoting optimal aging at home for older adults with multimorbidity. J Comorb. 2018 Jul 31;8(1):2235042X18789508. doi: 10.1177/2235042X18789508. eCollection 2018.
- Markle-Reid M, Ploeg J, Fraser KD, Fisher KA, Bartholomew A, Griffith LE, Miklavcic J, Gafni A, Thabane L, Upshur R. Community Program Improves Quality of Life and Self-Management in Older Adults with Diabetes Mellitus and Comorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Feb;66(2):263-273. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15173. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
- Miklavcic JJ, Fraser KD, Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Fisher K, Gafni A, Griffith LE, Hirst S, Sadowski CA, Thabane L, Triscott JAC, Upshur R. Effectiveness of a community program for older adults with type 2 diabetes and multimorbidity: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2020 May 13;20(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01557-0.
- Markle-Reid M, Ploeg J, Fraser KD, Fisher KA, Akhtar-Danesh N, Bartholomew A, Gafni A, Gruneir A, Hirst SP, Kaasalainen S, Stradiotto CK, Miklavcic J, Rojas-Fernandez C, Sadowski CA, Thabane L, Triscott JA, Upshur R. The ACHRU-CPP versus usual care for older adults with type-2 diabetes and multiple chronic conditions and their family caregivers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Feb 6;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1795-9.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
1 septembre 2014
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
1 mai 2017
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
1 mai 2017
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
3 juin 2014
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
6 juin 2014
Première publication (Estimation)
9 juin 2014
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
30 août 2019
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
28 août 2019
Dernière vérification
1 août 2019
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- DRCT-06669
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .