Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Comparison Study of Usual Care vs. Usual Care Plus Community Intervention to Manage Type 2 Diabetes

28 augusti 2019 uppdaterad av: Maureen Markle-Reid, McMaster University

A Client-Driven Intervention to Support Self-Management Among Community-Living Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Multiple Chronic Conditions

The overall purpose of this research is to examine and compare the effectiveness and costs of a community-based intervention to support self-management with usual primary care for older adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and multiple chronic conditions and their family caregivers. Once the study is complete, the investigators will be able to determine if there is any measurable difference in self-care management between usual care plus the intervention versus usual care alone.

Studieöversikt

Detaljerad beskrivning

Research Goal

To examine the comparative effectiveness and costs of a community-based intervention to support self-management with usual primary care for older adults with T2DM and Multiple Chronic Conditions and their family caregivers.

Objectives

  1. To determine if a 6-month, IP, community-based intervention improve self-management compared with usual primary care services?
  2. To compare the effectiveness of the intervention on HRQoL, physical activity, nutritional status, depression, anxiety, diabetes parameters (blood glucose levels [HbA1c, hypoglycemic episodes]), diabetes-related complications, number of vascular events, social support number of falls, fall risk and medication safety with usual primary care services?
  3. To determine the effectiveness of the intervention on HRQoL of family caregivers compared with usual primary care?
  4. To assess whether or not the intervention improves clinical practice behaviours?
  5. To determine the 6-month costs of use of health services of the intervention compared with usual care, from a social perspective?
  6. To identify which subgroups of older adults with T2DM and MCC benefit most from the intervention?
  7. To determine the effectiveness of the intervention based on sex/gender and region?
  8. To determine the overall feasibility and acceptability of an IP community-based health promotion intervention and what can be identified as barriers and facilitators to implementation?

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

291

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Kanada
        • Edmonton Oliver PCN
      • Leduc, Alberta, Kanada, T9E 6W2
        • Leduc Beaumont Devon PCN
      • Sherwood Park, Alberta, Kanada
        • Sherwood Park PCN
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Kanada, L8S 4K1
        • McMaster University
      • Lindsay, Ontario, Kanada
        • Ross Memorial Hospital
      • London, Ontario, Kanada
        • St. Joseph's Health Care
      • Peterborough, Ontario, Kanada
        • Peterborough Regional Health Centre
      • Port Hope, Ontario, Kanada
        • Port Hope Community Health Centre

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

65 år och äldre (Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • older adults aged 65+
  • live in the local vicinity of a participating Diabetes Education Program
  • were referred to their Diabetes Education Program within the past 24 months
  • competence in English (or access to a translator)
  • intention to continue living in the area for the next 6 months
  • two reported chronic conditions in addition to T2DM. Individuals with newly diagnosed T2DM as well as those who were already receiving treatment for T2DM will be eligible for inclusion in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • score of 20 or less in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test AND without access to a substitute decision maker to sign consent (Score of 20 or less is not in itself an exclusion).

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Hälsovårdsforskning
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Dubbel

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Inget ingripande: Usual Primary Care
Usual Primary Care will be received by half the participants during the course of the Study
Aktiv komparator: Home Visits and educational support
Intervention comprised of Home Visits and group educational sessions. Home Visits and will be conducted by Diabetes Education staff in lieu of usual care conducted at the Diabetes clinic. Lifestyle support and educational will be offered in the form of monthly Diabetes Wellness Days offered in the community where nutrition, exercise and support will be given to help improve self-management of diabetes.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities
Tidsram: Every two months from study onset until the end of study (6 months from baseline)
The SDSCA is a multidimensional measure of diabetes self-management with adequate internal and test-retest reliability, and evidence of validity and sensitivity to change. The revised SDSCA consists of items that assess the following aspects of the diabetes regimen: general and specific diet, exercise, blood-glucose testing, foot care, and smoking. Scores are calculated for each of these five regimen areas. This data is collected by the interventionists at each visit.
Every two months from study onset until the end of study (6 months from baseline)

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
SF12v2
Tidsram: Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
This measurement is used to assess Health related quality of Life. This survey consists of 12 questions that measure functional health and well-being from the client's perspective. It provides scores for eight health domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health), and psychometrically-based physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores
Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)

Andra resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
CES-D-10
Tidsram: Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
The CES-D has been used in prior studies of older adults with mood disorders, and has a high degree of reliability, content, construct and criterion related validity, distinguishes between depressed and non-depressed people, and is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in depressive symptoms over time in psychiatric populations.
Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
GAD-7
Tidsram: Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
Prevalence and severity of anxiety, measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener
Baseline and end of study (6 months from baseline)
Health Assessment forms
Tidsram: Baseline intervention interview, at 3 months and again at 6 months
• Diabetes parameters (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, hypoglycemic episodes), and presence of diabetes-related complications and comorbid chronic conditions, obtained from health assessment forms submitted by the Diabetes Education Program RN and RD after the first home visit and at 3 months and 6 months.
Baseline intervention interview, at 3 months and again at 6 months

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Maureen Markle-Reid, PhD, McMaster University
  • Huvudutredare: Jenny Ploeg, PhD, McMaster University

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Allmänna publikationer

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart

1 september 2014

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

1 maj 2017

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

1 maj 2017

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

3 juni 2014

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

6 juni 2014

Första postat (Uppskatta)

9 juni 2014

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

30 augusti 2019

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

28 augusti 2019

Senast verifierad

1 augusti 2019

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera