Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Evaluation of an Inpatient Sexual Risk Behavior Assessment Program (iRAP)

10 avril 2018 mis à jour par: Rhode Island Hospital
This is an exploratory pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and potential effects of an innovative, individualized electronic inpatient sexual health intervention (iRAP) for adolescent females. The central hypothesis is that the electronic intervention, a sexual health questionnaire with tailored feedback based on the Trans Theoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, will significantly increase adolescent females' requests for sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and sexual health management during their hospital admission.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are disproportionately common among 15-24 year-old females, and can have detrimental effects including pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. Most STI's are asymptomatic, especially for females, making screening programs essential. Current guidelines recommend HIV screening for all adolescents, and yearly chlamydia and gonorrhea screening for sexually active females under 25 years-old. Yet only one-third of primary care physicians report screening asymptomatic adolescents. Most adolescents report no sexual health discussion during preventative healthcare visits. Furthermore the majority do not regularly attend preventative healthcare visits. Therefore, urgent healthcare visits, often in emergency departments (ED) and inpatient settings, provide an important point of contact.

Given adolescents infrequently obtain outpatient sexual health services, the inpatient stay may serve as a critical intervention point. Other studies have found success with STI screening programs in the ED; none to our knowledge examined the efficacy of an inpatient sexual health screening protocol. Previous pilot data demonstrated, however, significant interest in sexual health information and desire for STI testing among adolescents admitted to a children's hospital.

Investigators conducted an exploratory study to evaluate the feasibility and potential effects of an innovative, individualized electronic inpatient sexual health intervention (iRAP) for adolescent females. The central hypothesis is that the electronic intervention, based on the Trans Theoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, will significantly increase adolescent females' requests for STI screening and sexual health management.

Investigators enrolled 70 14-18 year-old, medically stable female inpatients admitted to the hospitalist service at Hasbro Children's Hospital for a randomized control trial during a one-year period. Participants were randomized to receive an electronic sexual risk assessment with or without real-time tailored feedback. Feedback was based on the TTM, utilizing readiness for change to determine appropriate messaging. Participants were then able to electronically request sexual health management options, including STI testing, discussion with their inpatient or outpatient physician, or technology-hosted information on contraception. Investigators conducted a chart review of enrolled adolescents to determine if sexual health topics were addressed.

The investigators are examining participation rates, length of time to perform all study elements, and proportion of teens that obtain requested service. Additionally, the investigators are comparing participants' perceived reproductive health risk and uptake of offered services between the intervention and control groups.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

66

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

14 ans à 18 ans (Enfant, Adulte)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Femelle

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admitted to the Hospitalist service, English speaking, parent available for consent, medically/psychologically stable.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Wards of the state, no parent/guardian for consent, non-English speaking

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Intervention group
Received tailored feedback regarding sexual health risks
Electronic feedback based on participants "stage of change" which provided risk reduction behavior regarding their sexual health including use of condoms, contraceptions, and STI testing.
Aucune intervention: Control group
Did not receive tailored feedback.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Number of participants with requests for sexual health services, as assessed by sexual health options questionnaire
Délai: Immediate
All participants were able to request sexual health services while admitted to the hospital (options included: STI testing, speak with their MD, or watching contraception video). The services were offered using an electronic REDCap questionnaire, with prompt of "Would you like to request X during your hospital stay?" and response options of yes/no. The outcome will be assessed for each sexual health option (number of participants requesting STI testing, discussion with MD, or contraception video viewing) individually, as well as a variable created to show "any uptake" ie. request made for any one or more services.
Immediate

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

4 janvier 2017

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

29 octobre 2017

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

29 octobre 2017

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

4 avril 2018

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 avril 2018

Première publication (Réel)

18 avril 2018

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

18 avril 2018

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

10 avril 2018

Dernière vérification

1 mars 2018

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • Oh-Zopfi Pilot Award 2016-2017

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Tailored feedback

S'abonner