Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Effects of Physical Activity Adequacy Mindsets on Health and Wellbeing

28 janvier 2020 mis à jour par: Alia Crum, Stanford University

Harnessing Mindset in 21st Century Healthcare: Leveraging Mindset in Health Technology

It is widely known that physical activity is important for health and wellbeing, yet most Americans do not meet recommended levels of activity. People may commonly believe that only the actual amount of physical activity matters for health and wellbeing. However, the investigators propose that individuals' mindsets about the adequacy of their level of physical activity and its corresponding health consequences (activity adequacy mindsets) affect health outcomes, over and above their actual level of physical activity. In recent years, health technologies such as wearable fitness trackers have become popular tools to promote higher levels of physical activity. This study leverages the tracking and feedback capabilities of Apple Watch to study the effects of mindsets about physical activity on health and wellbeing, as well as the pathways through which these effects may occur.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Study Overview: This study examines how individuals' mindsets about the adequacy of their level of physical activity and its corresponding health consequences (activity adequacy mindsets) affect health outcomes. Participants attend an "onboarding" lab session in which they complete physiological, cognitive, and psychological measures and receive an Apple Watch to wear for the following 5 weeks. The Watch is equipped with a step count tracking app. No step count feedback is provided in week 1 as a baseline; starting in week 2, participants are randomized to 4 conditions in which either 1) accurate, 2) inflated, or 3) deflated step count is displayed on the watch in order to manipulate participants' perceived physical activity, independently of their actual physical activity. In condition 4, participants receive a meta-mindset intervention in addition to accurate step count feedback. Throughout the 5 weeks, participants complete short daily surveys and longer weekly surveys administered online. Finally, participants come in for an "offboarding" lab session in which the same measures are collected as in the onboarding session.

Participants: Participants will be 160 healthy adults recruited from the community, 40 per condition.

Main Hypotheses: This is a largely exploratory study, examining various mechanisms through which activity adequacy mindsets may affect health and wellbeing. Tests include (but are not limited to) the following key hypotheses:

H1) Inflated step count feedback (compared to accurate feedback) leads to a more positive activity adequacy mindset, and deflated feedback (compared to accurate feedback) leads to a more negative activity adequacy mindset (see Primary Outcome Measures).

H2) Activity adequacy mindset influences health and wellbeing (see Primary Outcome Measures) over and above actual physical activity.

H3) Activity adequacy mindset influences health and wellbeing through various mechanisms (see Secondary Outcome Measures):

H3a) Affective mechanism: A more positive (vs. negative) activity adequacy mindset leads to more positive everyday affect (incl. higher satisfaction, lower anxiety, lower stress). Positive affect in turn improves health and wellbeing.

H3b) Motivational/ behavioral mechanism: A more positive (vs. negative) activity adequacy mindset leads to higher motivation to exercise and improve one's health, as well as higher exercise self-efficacy. Higher motivation and self-efficacy in turn lead to higher levels of actual physical activity, which in turn improve health and wellbeing.

H3c) Placebo mechanism: A more positive (vs. negative) activity adequacy mindset directly improves health and wellbeing through placebo/ nocebo effects.

H4) A meta-mindset intervention teaching people about activity adequacy mindsets leads them to adopt more positive mindsets, which in turn predicts improved health and wellbeing through the mechanisms described under H3. That is, compared to accurate step count feedback only, accurate feedback plus meta-mindset intervention leads to improved health and wellbeing.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

164

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • California
      • Stanford, California, États-Unis, 94305
        • Stanford University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Low level of physical activity in the prior six months, as indicated by self-report
  • Walking as primary source of physical activity in the prior six months, as indicated by self-report
  • Ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Candidates who answer affirmatively to any of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) items will be excluded, unless they get clearance from a physician that they are able to participate in the study.
  • Candidates who report pregnancy will be excluded, as natural changes in weight and body composition during pregnancy would invalidate our results.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Science basique
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Accurate step count feedback

All arms are given identical instructions in the onboarding session, including information about the study purpose and Apple Watch. They complete the same set of physiological, cognitive, and psychological measures and receive an Apple Watch to wear for the following 5 weeks. Throughout the 5 weeks, participants complete short daily surveys and longer weekly surveys. Finally, participants come in for an "offboarding" lab session in which the same measures are collected as in the onboarding session.

In this arm, participants' Apple Watches will simply display their accurate step count.

After one week of baseline step count measurement, participants will receive the intervention. Starting day 8, participants' Apple Watches will start displaying their step count. In this arm, they will simply see their accurate step count.
Expérimental: Deflated step count feedback

All arms are given identical instructions in the onboarding session, including information about the study purpose and Apple Watch. They complete the same set of physiological, cognitive, and psychological measures and receive an Apple Watch to wear for the following 5 weeks. Throughout the 5 weeks, participants complete short daily surveys and longer weekly surveys. Finally, participants come in for an "offboarding" lab session in which the same measures are collected as in the onboarding session.

In this arm, participants' Apple Watches will display a deflated step count.

After one week of baseline step count measurement, participants will receive the intervention. Starting day 8, participants' Apple Watches will start displaying their step count. In this arm, they will see their step count deflated by 40% (i.e., their step count multiplied by 0.6).
Expérimental: Inflated step count feedback

All arms are given identical instructions in the onboarding session, including information about the study purpose and Apple Watch. They complete the same set of physiological, cognitive, and psychological measures and receive an Apple Watch to wear for the following 5 weeks. Throughout the 5 weeks, participants complete short daily surveys and longer weekly surveys. Finally, participants come in for an "offboarding" lab session in which the same measures are collected as in the onboarding session.

In this arm, participants' Apple Watches will display an inflated step count.

After one week of baseline step count measurement, participants will receive the intervention. Starting day 8, participants' Apple Watches will start displaying their step count. In this arm, they will see their step count inflated by 40% (i.e., their step count multiplied by 1.4).
Expérimental: Accurate feedback + mindset intervention

All arms are given identical instructions in the onboarding session, including information about the study purpose and Apple Watch. They complete the same set of physiological, cognitive, and psychological measures and receive an Apple Watch to wear for the following 5 weeks. Throughout the 5 weeks, participants complete short daily surveys and longer weekly surveys. Finally, participants come in for an "offboarding" lab session in which the same measures are collected as in the onboarding session.

In this arm, participants' Apple Watches will display their accurate step count. Additionally, participants in this arm will receive a meta-mindset intervention.

After one week of baseline step count measurement, participants will receive the intervention. Starting day 8, participants' Apple Watches will start displaying their step count. In this arm, they will simply see their accurate step count.

Additionally, participants in this arm will receive a meta-mindset intervention in the first weekly survey on day 7, which consists of a series of videos and reflection exercises to teach participants about the power of mindsets and encourage them to choose adaptive mindsets that will benefit their health. There are also short booster reflection exercises in all subsequent daily and weekly surveys, reinforcing the message about adaptive mindsets.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Perceived Amount of Exercise Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in daily and weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Perceived Amount of Exercise (manipulation check), measured via 1-item self-report in all surveys. The full item is "Overall, how much exercise did you get today?", range 1 (None at all) - 5 (A great deal), with high values considered a better outcome.
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in daily and weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Change in Activity Adequacy Mindset Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Activity Adequacy Mindset (key mediator) measured via self-report in onboarding/ offboarding surveys (7 items) and weekly surveys (shortened, 5 items). This scale ranges from 1 - 7, with higher values representing better outcomes. The items will be combined in a composite score by averaging.
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Change in Physical Health Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session) and end of study (offboarding session); except average daily heart rate, which is based on Apple Watch HR recordings measured approx. every 20 minutes when participant is wearing watch during the 5 weeks
Physical Health measures are BMI (calculated from self-reported height and weight measured in lab, BMI = kg/m^2); Body fat percentage (measured on lab scale); Resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (measured in lab); Resting heart rate (HR) (measured in lab); Average daily heart rate (measured by Apple Watch heart rate sensor); VO2max, approximated through the Canadian Home Fitness Test (based on post-exercise HR measured in lab); Perceived general health (measured via 1-item self-report); Perceived fitness (measured via 1-item self-report); Physical function and pain (measured via PROMIS-29 Profile v2.0 questionnaire). All measures will be factor analyzed and combined into a summary score (average of standardized scores weighted by variables' factor loading), provided factor analysis shows that they load onto one factor (i.e., rotated factor loadings of >= |0.4|). Measures will also be analyzed separately for exploratory purposes.
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session) and end of study (offboarding session); except average daily heart rate, which is based on Apple Watch HR recordings measured approx. every 20 minutes when participant is wearing watch during the 5 weeks
Change in Mental Health Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session) and end of study (offboarding session)
Anxiety, depressive symptoms, ability to participate in social roles and activities, sleep disturbance, fatigue (measured via PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)-29 Profile v2.0 questionnaire), and stress (measured via Perceived Stress Scale, PSS). Each PROMIS subscale ranges from 1-5, with higher values representing better outcomes. Items will be averaged into subscale composite scores. The PSS ranges from 1-5, with higher values representing worse outcomes. PSS items will be averaged into a composite score. All measures will be factor analyzed and combined into a summary score (average of standardized scores weighted by variables' factor loading), provided factor analysis shows that they load onto one factor (i.e., rotated factor loadings of >= |0.4|). Measures will also be analyzed separately for exploratory purposes.
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session) and end of study (offboarding session)
Change in Cognitive Function Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session) and end of study (offboarding session)
Stroop task performance
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session) and end of study (offboarding session)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Affect Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in daily and weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Measured via self-report (Affect Valuation Index, AVI, and 2 items measuring stress/ anxiety). AVI items range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating higher frequency of any given emotion. Items will be averaged into 8 subscale composite scores according to the AVI protocol by averaging. Items measuring stress/ anxiety range from 1-5 with higher scores representing worse outcomes. All measures will be factor analyzed and combined into a summary score (average of standardized scores weighted by variables' factor loading), provided factor analysis shows that they load onto one factor (i.e., rotated factor loadings of >= |0.4|). Measures will also be analyzed separately for exploratory purposes.
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in daily and weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Change in Self-Efficacy for Exercise Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Measured via self-report (Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale). Items range from 1-5, with higher values representing better outcomes. Items will be averaged into a composite scale.
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Change in Motivation for exercise and health promotion Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Measured via self-report (2 items measuring exercise motivation and health promotion motivation). Items range from 1-5, with higher values representing better outcomes. Items will be averaged into a composite scale.
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Change in Physical Activity Behavior Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: Step count measured by Apple Watch every ~ 15 min when participant is wearing watch during the 5 weeks; IPAQ and custom physical activity measure assessed in onboarding/ offboarding sessions, and the latter also in weekly surveys
Physical activity is measured via daily step count tracked by Apple Watch, and via self-report (IPAQ, and a measure adapted from NHANES for this study). All measures will be factor analyzed and combined into a summary score (average of standardized scores weighted by variables' factor loading), provided factor analysis shows that they load onto one factor (i.e., rotated factor loadings of >= |0.4|). Measures will also be analyzed separately for exploratory purposes.
5 weeks: Step count measured by Apple Watch every ~ 15 min when participant is wearing watch during the 5 weeks; IPAQ and custom physical activity measure assessed in onboarding/ offboarding sessions, and the latter also in weekly surveys
Change in Other Health Behaviors (diet, sleep, drinking, smoking) Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Measured via self-report (9 items). All measures will be factor analyzed and combined into a summary score (average of standardized scores weighted by variables' factor loading), provided factor analysis shows that they load onto one factor (i.e., rotated factor loadings of >= |0.4|). Measures will also be analyzed separately for exploratory purposes.
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Change in Process Mindset Over 5 Weeks
Délai: 5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in one of the weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)
Exercise process mindset and Health process mindset are measured via self-report (7 items per scale). Items range from 1-4, with higher values representing better outcomes. Items will be averaged into two composite scores (General Process Mindset and Exercise Process Mindset). If items from both subscales have sufficient reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.7), they will be averaged into one composite scale.
5 weeks: measured at baseline (onboarding session), in one of the weekly surveys, and at end of study (offboarding session)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Alia J Crum, PhD, Stanford University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

30 mai 2018

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

15 novembre 2019

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

15 novembre 2019

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

11 avril 2019

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 mai 2019

Première publication (Réel)

7 mai 2019

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

30 janvier 2020

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 janvier 2020

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2020

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 36098
  • DP2AT009511 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Description du régime IPD

If made publicly available, all data will be de-identified and the anonymous data will be shared with researchers on the Open Science Framework

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

3
S'abonner