- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07630701
Inverted Periosteal Flap vs Buccal Advancement Flap for Oroantral Communication Closure
Comparison of Inverted Periosteal Flap Versus Buccal Advancement Flap for Closure of Post-Extraction Maxillary Sinus Perforation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Oroantral communication is an abnormal connection between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus, most commonly occurring after extraction of maxillary posterior teeth. If not closed properly, it may lead to oroantral fistula or maxillary sinus complications.
This randomized controlled clinical study will compare the inverted buccal periosteal flap with the conventional buccal advancement flap for closure of recent post-extraction oroantral communications. The study will include 24 patients with communications measuring 3-6 mm and diagnosed within 48 hours after non-surgical extraction.
Participants will be randomly divided into two groups. In the test group, closure will be performed using the inverted buccal periosteal flap, where the periosteal layer is dissected, inverted over the defect, and sutured to the palatal tissue without tension. In the control group, closure will be performed using the buccal advancement flap, where a buccal mucoperiosteal flap is advanced palatally and sutured to cover the communication.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Damascus, Syrie
- School of Dental Medicine
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of an oroantral communication (OAC) with a diameter between 3-7 mm.
- Communication resulting from extraction of posterior maxillary teeth (first molar, second molar, third molar, or second premolar).
- Recent perforation occurring no more than 48 hours prior to surgical intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of foreign bodies or residual tooth fragments within the maxillary sinus.
- Presence of systemic diseases that could impair wound healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression).
- History of maxillary sinusitis prior to the perforation.
- Presence of periapical lesions or cysts at the extraction site.
- Smokers.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Inverted Buccal Periosteal Flap
Participants in this arm will receive surgical closure of the post-extraction oroantral communication using the inverted buccal periosteal flap.
A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, the periosteal layer will be dissected and inverted over the defect, then sutured to the palatal tissue to achieve tension-free closure.
|
Surgical closure of post-extraction oroantral communication using an inverted buccal periosteal flap.
A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, followed by dissection of the periosteal layer from the overlying mucosa.
The periosteal flap will then be inverted over the defect and sutured to the palatal tissue to achieve tension-free closure.
|
|
Comparateur actif: Buccal Advancement Flap
Participants in this arm will receive surgical closure of the post-extraction oroantral communication using the conventional buccal advancement flap.
A buccal mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, advanced palatally, and sutured to the palatal mucosa to cover the communication.
|
Surgical closure of post-extraction oroantral communication using the conventional buccal advancement flap.
A buccal full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, released by periosteal scoring, advanced palatally, and sutured to the palatal mucosa to cover the communication.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful Closure of Oroantral Communication
Délai: 1 week, 15 days, and 45 days after surgery.
|
Successful closure will be assessed clinically by confirming the absence of oroantral fistula formation, absence of fluid leakage through the nose, and absence of air leakage or air bubbles during the Valsalva test.
|
1 week, 15 days, and 45 days after surgery.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain
Délai: Postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7.
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale.
The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
Postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7.
|
|
Postoperative Facial Edema
Délai: Postoperative days 1, 3, and 5.
|
Facial edema will be assessed using extraoral linear measurements between fixed facial reference points.
The measured distances will be used to estimate postoperative facial swelling and compare changes between the two study groups.
Higher values indicate greater facial edema and therefore a worse outcome.
|
Postoperative days 1, 3, and 5.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Directeur d'études: Saleh Al Kurdi, PhD, Arab International University
- Chercheur principal: Majd S Mohammad, DDs, Damascus University
- Chaise d'étude: Omar A Heshmeh, PhD, Damascus University
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Visscher SH, van Minnen B, Bos RR. Closure of oroantral communications: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jun;68(6):1384-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.044. Epub 2010 Mar 12. No abstract available.
- Parvini P, Obreja K, Begic A, Schwarz F, Becker J, Sader R, Salti L. Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula. Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Apr 1;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0165-7.
- Lago-Mendez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, Gude-Sampedro F, Gandara Rey JM, Garcia-Garcia A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):979-83. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.281.
- Rosenfeld EA. Inverted periosteal flap: an alternative to the buccal advancement flap for tension-free, watertight closure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;72(7):1244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
- Ibrahim MT, Gharieb EA, Sheta MS. A pedicled buccal periosteal flap for the closure of oro-antral fistula. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04217-6.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- DN-230426-776
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .