- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT07630701
Inverted Periosteal Flap vs Buccal Advancement Flap for Oroantral Communication Closure
Comparison of Inverted Periosteal Flap Versus Buccal Advancement Flap for Closure of Post-Extraction Maxillary Sinus Perforation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
Oroantral communication is an abnormal connection between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus, most commonly occurring after extraction of maxillary posterior teeth. If not closed properly, it may lead to oroantral fistula or maxillary sinus complications.
This randomized controlled clinical study will compare the inverted buccal periosteal flap with the conventional buccal advancement flap for closure of recent post-extraction oroantral communications. The study will include 24 patients with communications measuring 3-6 mm and diagnosed within 48 hours after non-surgical extraction.
Participants will be randomly divided into two groups. In the test group, closure will be performed using the inverted buccal periosteal flap, where the periosteal layer is dissected, inverted over the defect, and sutured to the palatal tissue without tension. In the control group, closure will be performed using the buccal advancement flap, where a buccal mucoperiosteal flap is advanced palatally and sutured to cover the communication.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
-
Damascus, Siria
- School of Dental Medicine
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
- Adulto
Accetta volontari sani
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of an oroantral communication (OAC) with a diameter between 3-7 mm.
- Communication resulting from extraction of posterior maxillary teeth (first molar, second molar, third molar, or second premolar).
- Recent perforation occurring no more than 48 hours prior to surgical intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of foreign bodies or residual tooth fragments within the maxillary sinus.
- Presence of systemic diseases that could impair wound healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression).
- History of maxillary sinusitis prior to the perforation.
- Presence of periapical lesions or cysts at the extraction site.
- Smokers.
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Trattamento
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Inverted Buccal Periosteal Flap
Participants in this arm will receive surgical closure of the post-extraction oroantral communication using the inverted buccal periosteal flap.
A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, the periosteal layer will be dissected and inverted over the defect, then sutured to the palatal tissue to achieve tension-free closure.
|
Surgical closure of post-extraction oroantral communication using an inverted buccal periosteal flap.
A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, followed by dissection of the periosteal layer from the overlying mucosa.
The periosteal flap will then be inverted over the defect and sutured to the palatal tissue to achieve tension-free closure.
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Buccal Advancement Flap
Participants in this arm will receive surgical closure of the post-extraction oroantral communication using the conventional buccal advancement flap.
A buccal mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, advanced palatally, and sutured to the palatal mucosa to cover the communication.
|
Surgical closure of post-extraction oroantral communication using the conventional buccal advancement flap.
A buccal full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, released by periosteal scoring, advanced palatally, and sutured to the palatal mucosa to cover the communication.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful Closure of Oroantral Communication
Lasso di tempo: 1 week, 15 days, and 45 days after surgery.
|
Successful closure will be assessed clinically by confirming the absence of oroantral fistula formation, absence of fluid leakage through the nose, and absence of air leakage or air bubbles during the Valsalva test.
|
1 week, 15 days, and 45 days after surgery.
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain
Lasso di tempo: Postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7.
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale.
The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
Postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7.
|
|
Postoperative Facial Edema
Lasso di tempo: Postoperative days 1, 3, and 5.
|
Facial edema will be assessed using extraoral linear measurements between fixed facial reference points.
The measured distances will be used to estimate postoperative facial swelling and compare changes between the two study groups.
Higher values indicate greater facial edema and therefore a worse outcome.
|
Postoperative days 1, 3, and 5.
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Direttore dello studio: Saleh Al Kurdi, PhD, Arab International University
- Investigatore principale: Majd S Mohammad, DDs, Damascus University
- Cattedra di studio: Omar A Heshmeh, PhD, Damascus University
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Visscher SH, van Minnen B, Bos RR. Closure of oroantral communications: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jun;68(6):1384-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.044. Epub 2010 Mar 12. No abstract available.
- Parvini P, Obreja K, Begic A, Schwarz F, Becker J, Sader R, Salti L. Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula. Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Apr 1;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0165-7.
- Lago-Mendez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, Gude-Sampedro F, Gandara Rey JM, Garcia-Garcia A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):979-83. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.281.
- Rosenfeld EA. Inverted periosteal flap: an alternative to the buccal advancement flap for tension-free, watertight closure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;72(7):1244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
- Ibrahim MT, Gharieb EA, Sheta MS. A pedicled buccal periosteal flap for the closure of oro-antral fistula. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04217-6.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- DN-230426-776
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .