- ICH GCP
- Amerikanska kliniska prövningsregistret
- Klinisk prövning NCT07630701
Inverted Periosteal Flap vs Buccal Advancement Flap for Oroantral Communication Closure
Comparison of Inverted Periosteal Flap Versus Buccal Advancement Flap for Closure of Post-Extraction Maxillary Sinus Perforation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Studieöversikt
Status
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
Oroantral communication is an abnormal connection between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus, most commonly occurring after extraction of maxillary posterior teeth. If not closed properly, it may lead to oroantral fistula or maxillary sinus complications.
This randomized controlled clinical study will compare the inverted buccal periosteal flap with the conventional buccal advancement flap for closure of recent post-extraction oroantral communications. The study will include 24 patients with communications measuring 3-6 mm and diagnosed within 48 hours after non-surgical extraction.
Participants will be randomly divided into two groups. In the test group, closure will be performed using the inverted buccal periosteal flap, where the periosteal layer is dissected, inverted over the defect, and sutured to the palatal tissue without tension. In the control group, closure will be performed using the buccal advancement flap, where a buccal mucoperiosteal flap is advanced palatally and sutured to cover the communication.
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Studieorter
-
-
-
Damascus, Syrien
- School of Dental Medicine
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
- Vuxen
Tar emot friska volontärer
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of an oroantral communication (OAC) with a diameter between 3-7 mm.
- Communication resulting from extraction of posterior maxillary teeth (first molar, second molar, third molar, or second premolar).
- Recent perforation occurring no more than 48 hours prior to surgical intervention.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of foreign bodies or residual tooth fragments within the maxillary sinus.
- Presence of systemic diseases that could impair wound healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression).
- History of maxillary sinusitis prior to the perforation.
- Presence of periapical lesions or cysts at the extraction site.
- Smokers.
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Behandling
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
- Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: Inverted Buccal Periosteal Flap
Participants in this arm will receive surgical closure of the post-extraction oroantral communication using the inverted buccal periosteal flap.
A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, the periosteal layer will be dissected and inverted over the defect, then sutured to the palatal tissue to achieve tension-free closure.
|
Surgical closure of post-extraction oroantral communication using an inverted buccal periosteal flap.
A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, followed by dissection of the periosteal layer from the overlying mucosa.
The periosteal flap will then be inverted over the defect and sutured to the palatal tissue to achieve tension-free closure.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Buccal Advancement Flap
Participants in this arm will receive surgical closure of the post-extraction oroantral communication using the conventional buccal advancement flap.
A buccal mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, advanced palatally, and sutured to the palatal mucosa to cover the communication.
|
Surgical closure of post-extraction oroantral communication using the conventional buccal advancement flap.
A buccal full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated, released by periosteal scoring, advanced palatally, and sutured to the palatal mucosa to cover the communication.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful Closure of Oroantral Communication
Tidsram: 1 week, 15 days, and 45 days after surgery.
|
Successful closure will be assessed clinically by confirming the absence of oroantral fistula formation, absence of fluid leakage through the nose, and absence of air leakage or air bubbles during the Valsalva test.
|
1 week, 15 days, and 45 days after surgery.
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain
Tidsram: Postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7.
|
Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale.
The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
|
Postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7.
|
|
Postoperative Facial Edema
Tidsram: Postoperative days 1, 3, and 5.
|
Facial edema will be assessed using extraoral linear measurements between fixed facial reference points.
The measured distances will be used to estimate postoperative facial swelling and compare changes between the two study groups.
Higher values indicate greater facial edema and therefore a worse outcome.
|
Postoperative days 1, 3, and 5.
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Sponsor
Samarbetspartners
Utredare
- Studierektor: Saleh Al Kurdi, PhD, Arab International University
- Huvudutredare: Majd S Mohammad, DDs, Damascus University
- Studiestol: Omar A Heshmeh, PhD, Damascus University
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Allmänna publikationer
- Visscher SH, van Minnen B, Bos RR. Closure of oroantral communications: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jun;68(6):1384-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.044. Epub 2010 Mar 12. No abstract available.
- Parvini P, Obreja K, Begic A, Schwarz F, Becker J, Sader R, Salti L. Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula. Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Apr 1;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0165-7.
- Lago-Mendez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, Gude-Sampedro F, Gandara Rey JM, Garcia-Garcia A. Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):979-83. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.281.
- Rosenfeld EA. Inverted periosteal flap: an alternative to the buccal advancement flap for tension-free, watertight closure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;72(7):1244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
- Ibrahim MT, Gharieb EA, Sheta MS. A pedicled buccal periosteal flap for the closure of oro-antral fistula. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04217-6.
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Faktisk)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Nyckelord
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- DN-230426-776
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .