- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07739862
Acceleromyography Versus Electromyography for Neuromuscular Recovery Assessment at the End of Surgery
Concordance Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography for Assessment of Neuromuscular Recovery at the End of Surgery
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is recommended to reduce the incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade and its associated postoperative complications. Although electromyography is considered the current clinical reference method for objective neuromuscular monitoring, acceleromyography remains the most commonly used technique in routine clinical practice because of its availability, lower cost, and ease of use. However, acceleromyography may overestimate neuromuscular recovery, particularly when baseline normalization is not performed.
This prospective observational diagnostic agreement study will enroll adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia requiring administration of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents, simultaneous train-of-four (TOF) ratio measurements will be obtained using acceleromyography and electromyography. Acceleromyography will be performed according to routine clinical practice without baseline normalization, while electromyography will serve as the reference method.
The primary objective is to evaluate the agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography measurements obtained at the end of surgery. Secondary objectives include estimating the mean bias between methods, calculating the 95% limits of agreement using Bland-Altman analysis, evaluating proportional bias, and determining the proportion of patients in whom acceleromyography indicates adequate neuromuscular recovery (TOF ≥0.9) while electromyography demonstrates residual neuromuscular blockade (TOF <0.9).
Demographic, clinical, and anesthetic variables will also be collected. Approximately 70 participants are expected to be enrolled.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Santiago Metropolitan
-
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chili, 8431657
- Clínica Dávila
-
Contact:
- Alejandra Rivera, MsC Epidemiology
- Numéro de téléphone: 930363776
- E-mail: alejandra.rivera@davila.cl
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 18 years or older.
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.
- Administration of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents.
- Written informed consent provided.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pre-existing neuromuscular disease.
- Upper extremity abnormalities preventing neuromuscular monitoring.
- Contraindications to neuromuscular monitoring.
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Adults Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade.
Simultaneous train-of-four (TOF) ratio measurements will be obtained at the end of surgery using acceleromyography and electromyography before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents.
|
Simultaneous quantitative neuromuscular monitoring using acceleromyography and electromyography to measure the train-of-four (TOF) ratio at the end of surgery before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Agreement Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography Train-of-Four Ratios
Délai: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Agreement between the train-of-four (TOF) ratios measured simultaneously by acceleromyography and electromyography at the end of surgery.
Agreement between the two measurement methods will be evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Bias Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography TOF Ratios
Délai: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Mean difference between the TOF ratio measured by acceleromyography and the TOF ratio measured by electromyography.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
|
Ninety-Five Percent Limits of Agreement Between TOF Monitoring Methods
Délai: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Upper and lower 95% limits of agreement for the difference between acceleromyography and electromyography TOF ratio measurements, calculated using Bland-Altman analysis.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
|
Proportional Bias Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography TOF Ratios
Délai: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Presence and magnitude of proportional bias between the two monitoring methods, evaluated by assessing the relationship between the difference in TOF ratios and the mean TOF ratio obtained by acceleromyography and electromyography.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
|
Proportion of Participants With False Neuromuscular Recovery Indicated by Acceleromyography
Délai: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Proportion of participants in whom acceleromyography indicates adequate neuromuscular recovery, defined as a TOF ratio greater than or equal to 0.90, while electromyography indicates residual neuromuscular blockade, defined as a TOF ratio below 0.90.
|
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Dagoberto Ojeda, MD, Clínica Dávila
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- CD2026/16
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .