Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Acceleromyography Versus Electromyography for Neuromuscular Recovery Assessment at the End of Surgery

28 luglio 2026 aggiornato da: Clínica Dávila

Concordance Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography for Assessment of Neuromuscular Recovery at the End of Surgery

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography for measuring train-of-four (TOF) ratio at the end of surgery before reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade will undergo simultaneous TOF measurements using both monitoring methods. The study will assess the agreement between the two techniques, estimate measurement bias and limits of agreement, and determine the frequency of clinically relevant disagreement that could affect assessment of neuromuscular recovery and safe extubation.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is recommended to reduce the incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade and its associated postoperative complications. Although electromyography is considered the current clinical reference method for objective neuromuscular monitoring, acceleromyography remains the most commonly used technique in routine clinical practice because of its availability, lower cost, and ease of use. However, acceleromyography may overestimate neuromuscular recovery, particularly when baseline normalization is not performed.

This prospective observational diagnostic agreement study will enroll adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia requiring administration of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents, simultaneous train-of-four (TOF) ratio measurements will be obtained using acceleromyography and electromyography. Acceleromyography will be performed according to routine clinical practice without baseline normalization, while electromyography will serve as the reference method.

The primary objective is to evaluate the agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography measurements obtained at the end of surgery. Secondary objectives include estimating the mean bias between methods, calculating the 95% limits of agreement using Bland-Altman analysis, evaluating proportional bias, and determining the proportion of patients in whom acceleromyography indicates adequate neuromuscular recovery (TOF ≥0.9) while electromyography demonstrates residual neuromuscular blockade (TOF <0.9).

Demographic, clinical, and anesthetic variables will also be collected. Approximately 70 participants are expected to be enrolled.

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Stimato)

70

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Santiago Metropolitan
      • Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile, 8431657

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Metodo di campionamento

Campione non probabilistico

Popolazione di studio

Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade at Clínica Dávila.

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.
  • Administration of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents.
  • Written informed consent provided.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing neuromuscular disease.
  • Upper extremity abnormalities preventing neuromuscular monitoring.
  • Contraindications to neuromuscular monitoring.
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
Adults Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Simultaneous train-of-four (TOF) ratio measurements will be obtained at the end of surgery using acceleromyography and electromyography before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents.
Simultaneous quantitative neuromuscular monitoring using acceleromyography and electromyography to measure the train-of-four (TOF) ratio at the end of surgery before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Agreement Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography Train-of-Four Ratios
Lasso di tempo: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
Agreement between the train-of-four (TOF) ratios measured simultaneously by acceleromyography and electromyography at the end of surgery. Agreement between the two measurement methods will be evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis.
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Mean Bias Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography TOF Ratios
Lasso di tempo: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
Mean difference between the TOF ratio measured by acceleromyography and the TOF ratio measured by electromyography.
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
Ninety-Five Percent Limits of Agreement Between TOF Monitoring Methods
Lasso di tempo: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
Upper and lower 95% limits of agreement for the difference between acceleromyography and electromyography TOF ratio measurements, calculated using Bland-Altman analysis.
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
Proportional Bias Between Acceleromyography and Electromyography TOF Ratios
Lasso di tempo: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
Presence and magnitude of proportional bias between the two monitoring methods, evaluated by assessing the relationship between the difference in TOF ratios and the mean TOF ratio obtained by acceleromyography and electromyography.
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
Proportion of Participants With False Neuromuscular Recovery Indicated by Acceleromyography
Lasso di tempo: At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents
Proportion of participants in whom acceleromyography indicates adequate neuromuscular recovery, defined as a TOF ratio greater than or equal to 0.90, while electromyography indicates residual neuromuscular blockade, defined as a TOF ratio below 0.90.
At the end of surgery, before administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Dagoberto Ojeda, MD, Clínica Dávila

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 agosto 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 gennaio 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 gennaio 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

24 luglio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

28 luglio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

31 luglio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

31 luglio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

28 luglio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 luglio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. Only aggregate study results will be reported in scientific publications and presentations. Participant confidentiality will be protected in accordance with institutional policies and applicable ethical and regulatory requirements.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi