Laryngo-tracheal ultrasonography to confirm correct endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway placement

Jacek A Wojtczak, Davide Cattano, Jacek A Wojtczak, Davide Cattano

Abstract

Waveform capnography was recommended as the most reliable method to confirm correct endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway placements. However, capnography may be unreliable during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and during low flow states. It may lead to an unnecessary removal of a well-placed endotracheal tube, re-intubation and interruption of chest compressions. Real-time upper airway (laryngo-tracheal) ultrasonography to confirm correct endotracheal tube placement was shown to be very useful in cadaveric models and during emergency intubation. Tracheal ultrasonography does not interrupt chest compressions and is not affected by low pulmonary flow or airway obstruction, but is limited by ultrasonography scattering and acoustic artifacts generated in air - mucosa interfaces. Sonographic upper airway assessment emerges as a rapid and easily available method to predict difficult intubation, to assess the laryngeal and hypopharyngeal size and visualize the position of the laryngeal mask airway in situ. This study demonstrates that the replacement of air with saline in endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway cuffs and the use of the contrast agents enables detection of cuffs in the airway. It also allows visualization of the surrounding structures or tissues as the ultrasound beam can be transmitted through the fluid - filled cuffs without being reflected from air - mucosal interfaces.

Keywords: endotracheal intubation; laryngeal mask airway; upper airway sonography.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Upper panel – Sheridan ETT placed in the water bath (A) with the cuff inflated with air (B), saline (C) or saline with Optison™ (D). Middle panel – similar sequence of images/artifacts when the pneumatic cuff (c) of the LMA Supreme (E) was filled with air (F) saline (G) or saline with Optison™ (H). Lower panel – Sheridan ETT placed in the pig tracheal specimen (I). ETT cuffs were inflated with air (J), saline (K) and saline with Optison™ (L). The saline-filled cuff (K, L) allowed visualization of the tracheal (T) ring; a – air interface, b – bottom of the plastic container, c – cuff, r – reverberation, do – Image dropout, T – tracheal ring
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The endotracheal tube (upper panel) and the laryngeal mask airway (lower panel) placed in the cadaveric airway; H – hyoid bone, r – reverberation, C – cuff, P – posterior wall of the pharynx

References

    1. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, Kronick SL, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 8. Circulation. 2010;122:729–767.
    1. Chou HC, Tseng WP, Wang CH, Ma MH, Wang HP, Huang PC, et al. Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. Resuscitation. 2011;82:1279–1284.
    1. Adi O, Chuan TW, Rishya M. A feasibility study on bedside upper airway ultrasonography compared to waveform capnography for verifying endotracheal tube location after intubation. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013;5:7.
    1. Ma G, Davis DP, Schmitt J. The sensitivity and specificity of transcricothyroid ultrasonography to confirm endotracheal tube placement in a cadaver model. J Emerg Med. 2007;32:405–407.
    1. Raphael DT, Conard FU., 3rd Ultrasound confirmation of endotracheal tube placement. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;15:459–462.
    1. Cattano D, Wojtczak J, Seitan C, Aijazi H, Vale H, Altamirano A, et al. Models for predicting laryngeal anatomy and a standardized sizing system for supraglottic airway devices. Anesthesiology. 2012:A784.
    1. Wojtczak J. Submandibular sonography – assessment of hyomental distances and ratio, tongue size, and floor of the mouth musculature using portable ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:523–528.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner