Characterization of disease flares and impact of mepolizumab in patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome

Fabrizio Pane, Guillaume Lefevre, Namhee Kwon, Jane H Bentley, Steven W Yancey, Jonathan Steinfeld, Fabrizio Pane, Guillaume Lefevre, Namhee Kwon, Jane H Bentley, Steven W Yancey, Jonathan Steinfeld

Abstract

In patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), mepolizumab reduces the incidence of HES-related clinical signs and symptoms (flares). However, reports characterizing flare manifestations are limited. The double-blind, parallel-group 200622 trial (NCT02836496) enrolled patients ≥12 years old with HES for ≥6 months, ≥2 flares in the previous year, and screening blood eosinophil count ≥1000 cells/μL. Patients maintained ≥4 weeks stable HES therapy, before randomization (1:1) to 4-weekly subcutaneous mepolizumab (300 mg) or placebo, plus baseline HES therapy, for 32 weeks. This post hoc analysis investigated flare manifestations and duration by re-examining the Core Assessments form and narrative recorded for each flare during the study. Flare symptoms were retrospectively categorized into constitutional, dermatological, respiratory, nasal, gastrointestinal, neurologic and other. The most frequently reported flare symptoms were constitutional (94% of flares), dermatological (82% of flares) and respiratory (72% of flares); flares reported in patients receiving mepolizumab compared with placebo were generally similar in terms of the frequency of symptoms reported. Mepolizumab was associated with a shorter median (range) duration of flares (10.0 [4, 126] days) versus placebo (26.0 [1, 154] days). In patients with HES, flares were associated with symptoms linked to multiple organ systems highlighting the challenges faced for treating flares.

Clinical trial registration: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02836496, identifier NCT02836496.

Keywords: anti-interleukin-5 therapy; antibody; hypereosinophilic syndrome; mepolizumab; uncontrolled disease.

Conflict of interest statement

This study was funded by GSK (GSK ID: 200622; NCT02836496). The study sponsor had a role in study design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and in the writing of the study report. The sponsor did not place any restrictions on access to data or statements made in the manuscript report. Authors had full access to all study data and had final responsibility to submit the manuscript for publication. FP received advisory and speaker fees from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, GSK, AMGEN, Janssen, AbbVie, and Jazz Pharmaceutical, and research grants from Novartis and ARIAD Pharmaceuticals. GL received advisory fees from Shire, Takeda, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi Genzyme and has received research grants and travel/ accommodation expenses from AstraZeneca, Shire, Octapharma, and GSK. JB is an employee of GSK and own stocks/shares. NK, SWY and JS are former employees of GSK and own stocks/shares.

Copyright © 2022 Pane, Lefevre, Kwon, Bentley, Yancey and Steinfeld.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of flare symptoms by category and treatment group (A) and by category and term (B). *Each flare could be categorized with more than one individual symptom and across several symptom categories. SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of flare symptoms by category and treatment group, stratified by baseline blood eosinophil count category. SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frequency of flare symptoms by category and treatment group, stratified by baseline therapy (IS/CT [±OCS], OCS no IS/CT, No IS/CT/OCS). HES, hypereosinophilic syndrome; IS/CT, immunosuppressive/cytotoxic therapy; OCS, oral corticosteroids; SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Frequency of flare symptoms by category and treatment group, stratified by duration of HES. HES, hypereosinophilic syndrome; SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Flare duration and associated symptoms for each patient. Days are the study days since randomization (Day 0 is the study start). Each light line indicates an individual patient and each darker line indicates duration of a flare in patients receiving placebo (black) or mepolizumab (light grey). Two patients (one in each treatment group) experienced flares that overlapped with a previous flare (meeting either flare definition) by less than 14 days; these cases are shown on this figure as separate flares but counted as a single flare when summarizing the number and rate of HES flares. For those flares with missing end dates (arrows), the duration of flare was calculated up to date of study withdrawal. Codes indicate symptoms experienced during any flare. C, constitutional; D, dermatological; R, respiratory; E, nasal (ear, nose, throat); G, gastrointestinal, N, neurologic; O, other; SC, subcutaneous.

References

    1. Curtis C, Ogbogu P. Hypereosinophilic syndrome. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol (2016) 50(2):240–51. doi: 10.1007/s12016-015-8506-7
    1. Valent P, Klion AD, Horny HP, Roufosse F, Gotlib J, Weller PF, et al. . Contemporary consensus proposal on criteria and classification of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract (2012) 130(3):607–12.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.019
    1. Ogbogu PU, Bochner BS, Butterfield JH, Gleich GJ, Huss-Marp J, Kahn JE, et al. . Hypereosinophilic syndrome: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and response to therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2009) 124(6):1319–25.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.022
    1. Williams KW, Ware J, Abiodun A, Holland-Thomas NC, Khoury P, Klion AD. Hypereosinophilia in children and adults: A retrospective comparison. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract (2016) 4(5):941–7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.03.020
    1. Rothenberg ME, Klion AD, Roufosse FE, Kahn JE, Weller PF, Simon HU, et al. . Treatment of patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome with mepolizumab. N Engl J Med (2008) 358(12):1215–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070812
    1. Helbig G, Moskwa A, Hus M, Woźniczka K, Wieczorkiewicz A, Dziaczkowska-Suszek J, et al. . Heterogeneity among characteristics of hypereosinophilic syndromes. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2010) 125(6):1399–401.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.02.024
    1. Kovacs N, Benjamin K, Holland-Thomas N, Moshkovich O, Nelsen LM, Ortega H, et al. . Symptom assessment in hypereosinophilic syndrome: Toward development of a patient-reported outcomes tool. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract (2020) 8(9):3209–12.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.069
    1. Gotlib J. World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol (2017) 92(11):1243–59. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24880
    1. Klion A. Hypereosinophilic syndrome: Approach to treatment in the era of precision medicine. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program (2018) 2018(1):326–31. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.326
    1. Leru PM. Eosinophilic disorders: Evaluation of current classification and diagnostic criteria, proposal of a practical diagnostic algorithm. Clin Transl Allergy (2019) 9:36. doi: 10.1186/s13601-019-0277-4
    1. Podjasek JC, Butterfield JH. Mortality in hypereosinophilic syndrome: 19 years of experience at Mayo clinic with a review of the literature. Leuk Res (2013) 37(4):392–5. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.12.016
    1. nayat F, O'Neill SS, Zafar F, Marupudi S, Vasim I. Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome with cutaneous involvement: A comparative review of 32 cases. BMJ Case Rep (2018) 11(1):bcr2018227137. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227137
    1. Shomali W, Gotlib J. World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol (2019) 94(10):1149–67. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25617
    1. Butt NM, Lambert J, Ali S, Beer PA, Cross NC, Duncombe A, et al. . Guideline for the investigation and management of eosinophilia. Br J Haematol (2017) 176(4):553–72. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14488
    1. Whitehouse MW. Anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid drugs: Reflections after 60 years. Inflammopharmacology (2011) 19(1):1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10787-010-0056-2
    1. Pardanani A, Reeder T, Porrata LF, Li CY, Tazelaar HD, Baxter EJ, et al. . Imatinib therapy for hypereosinophilic syndrome and other eosinophilic disorders. Blood (2003) 101(9):3391–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3103
    1. Tabata R, Tabata C, Katashima Y, Yasumizu R. Effect of cyclosporine on lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome. Int Immunopharmacol (2013) 16(4):488–91. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2013.04.033
    1. Emma R, Morjaria JB, Fuochi V, Polosa R, Caruso M. Mepolizumab in the management of severe eosinophilic asthma in adults: Current evidence and practical experience. Ther Adv Respir Dis (2018) 12:1753466618808490. doi: 10.1177/1753466618808490
    1. European Medicines Agency . Mepolizumab (Nucala) summary of product characteristics (2021). Available at: (Accessed 10 November 2021).
    1. GSK . Mepolizumab (Nucala) prescribing information (2021). Available at: (Accessed November 2021).
    1. GSK . Nucala (Mepolizumab) press release (2021). Available at: (Accessed 24 November 2021).
    1. Roufosse F, Kahn JE, Rothenberg ME, Wardlaw AJ, Klion AD, Kirby SY, et al. . Efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in hypereosinophilic syndrome: A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2020) 146(6):1397–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.037
    1. Volmer T, Effenberger T, Trautner C, Buhl R. Consequences of long-term oral corticosteroid therapy and its side-effects in severe asthma in adults: A focused review of the impact data in the literature. Eur Respir J (2018) 52(4):1800703. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00703-2018
    1. Gleich GJ, Roufosse F, Chupp G, Faguer S, Walz B, Reiter A, et al. . Safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in hypereosinophilic syndrome: An open-label extension study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract (2021) S2213-2198(21):00891–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.050
    1. Acland JD, Gould AH. Normal variation in the count of circulating eosinophils in man. J Physiol (1956) 133(2):456–66. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005600
    1. Prazma CM, Bel EH, Price RG, Bradford ES, Albers FC, Yancey SW. Oral corticosteroid dose changes and impact on peripheral blood eosinophil counts in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: A post hoc analysis. Respir Res (2019) 20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1056-4
    1. Corren J, Du E, Gubbi A, Vanlandingham R. Variability in blood eosinophil counts in patients with eosinophilic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract (2021) 9(3):1224–31.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.033

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner