A Real-World, Prospective, Non-interventional Study of Adults with T2D Switching to IDegAsp from Glargine U100 or U300 in Japan

Fumika Shigiyama, Lei Liu, Helene Nordahl, Ryo Suzuki, Yuiko Yamamoto, Takahisa Hirose, Fumika Shigiyama, Lei Liu, Helene Nordahl, Ryo Suzuki, Yuiko Yamamoto, Takahisa Hirose

Abstract

Introduction: This real-world study investigated glycaemic control and quality of life (QoL) in insulin-experienced Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who switched to insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp).

Methods: This was a prospective, non-interventional, open-label, single-arm study. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥ 20 years) with T2D, previously treated with insulin glargine 100 or 300 units/mL (glargine U100/U300) with or without prandial insulin, who switched to IDegAsp as part of routine practice. Change from baseline to end of study (EOS; 26 weeks after initiation or IDegAsp discontinuation) in the following endpoints was assessed by adjusted mixed models for repeated measures: glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; primary endpoint), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin dose and total Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life (DTR-QoL) score. Non-severe hypoglycaemia was assessed in the 4-week period prior to initiating IDegAsp and in the 4-week period before EOS or discontinuation using negative binomial regression.

Results: The full analysis set included 236 patients from 29 centres in Japan with mean (± SD) age 63.2 years (± 12.3), HbA1c 7.7% (± 1.0) and diabetes duration 14.9 (± 9.3) years. After 26 weeks with IDegAsp, HbA1c (estimated change - 0.1% [- 0.2; 0.0]95% confidence interval (CI), p = 0.3036) and FPG (- 7.5 mg/dL [- 23.5; 8.5]95% CI, p = 0.3477) were maintained; there were significant reductions in basal and total insulin dose: estimated change of - 3.4 units/day [- 3.8; - 3.0]95% CI and - 1.0 units/day [- 1.9; - 0.1]95% CI, respectively (both p < 0.05). Non-severe hypoglycaemia rates were similar in the periods before and after initiating IDegAsp, while there was a significant improvement in total DTR-QoL score after 26 weeks with IDegAsp (p = 0.0012).

Conclusion: These real-world data suggest that switching to IDegAsp from glargine U100 or U300 was well tolerated in a Japanese population with T2D, with no new safety or tolerability signals, and associated with maintenance of glycaemic control and improved QoL.

Trial registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03745157.

Keywords: Insulin degludec/insulin aspart; Japanese population; Quality of life, real-world evidence; Type 2 diabetes.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Change in mean HbA1c from baseline to 26 weeks after insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) initiation. Full analysis set, on-treatment observation period. Data are observed means (± standard deviation [SD]). Estimated mean change (from baseline to end of study) was derived by an adjusted mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix, time and time squared as fixed effects, and patient and patient × time as random coefficients. The model included baseline HbA1c, time, age, sex, diabetes duration, body mass index (BMI), baseline prandial insulin, baseline glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) and study site as covariates. CI Confidence interval, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, n number of patients contributing data to time point
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change in mean FPG from baseline to 26 weeks after IDegAsp initiation. Full analysis set, on-treatment observation period. Analysed by a crude and an adjusted MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix, time and time squared as fixed effects, and patient and patient × time as random coefficients. The model included baseline FPG, time, age, sex, diabetes duration, BMI, baseline prandial insulin, baseline GLP-1 RA, baseline sulphonylurea/glinides and study site as covariates. FPG Fasting plasma glucose; see Fig. 1 caption for other abbreviations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change in mean insulin dose from baseline to 26 weeks after IDegAsp initiation. Full analysis set, on-treatment observation period. Data are observed means (± SD). Estimated mean change (from baseline to end of study) was derived using adjusted MMRMs with an unstructured covariance matrix, time and time squared as fixed effects, and patient and patient × time as random coefficients. The models included baseline insulin dose, time, age, sex, diabetes duration, BMI, baseline prandial insulin, baseline GLP-1 RA, baseline sulphonylurea/glinides and study site as covariates. Superscript ‘a’ indicates that insufficient data were available for statistical analysis. N/A Not applicable; see Fig. 1 caption for other abbreviations
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Median Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life (DTR-QoL) scores at baseline and 26 weeks after IDegAsp initiation. Data are observed median scores. n Number of patients contributing data to time point

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF diabetes atlas, 9th edn. Brussels: IDF. 2019. .
    1. Charvat H, Goto A, Goto M, et al. Impact of population aging on trends in diabetes prevalence: a meta-regression analysis of 160,000 Japanese adults. J Diabetes Investig. 2015;6:533–542. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12333.
    1. Araki E, Goto A, Kondo T, et al. Japanese clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2019. J Diabetes Investig. 2020;11:1020–1076. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13306.
    1. Morimoto A, Tatsumi Y, Deura K, et al. Impact of impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance on the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Japanese population: the Saku study. Diabetologia. 2013;56:1671–1679. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2932-y.
    1. Fukushima M, Suzuki H, Seino Y. Insulin secretion capacity in the development from normal glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;66(Suppl 1):S37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2003.11.024.
    1. Koga M, Toyomaki A, Miyazaki A, et al. Mediators of the effects of rice intake on health in individuals consuming a traditional Japanese diet centered on rice. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0185816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185816.
    1. Home P, Riddle M, Cefalu WT, et al. Insulin therapy in people with type 2 diabetes: opportunities and challenges? Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1499–1508. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2743.
    1. Strain WD, Blüher M, Paldánius P. Clinical inertia in individualising care for diabetes: is there time to do more in type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Ther. 2014;5:347–354. doi: 10.1007/s13300-014-0077-8.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Ryzodeg (insulin degludec/insulin aspart). Summary of product characteristics. 2020. . Accessed Jan 2021.
    1. Atkin S, Javed Z, Fulcher G. Insulin degludec and insulin aspart: novel insulins for the management of diabetes mellitus. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2015;6:375–388. doi: 10.1177/2040622315608646.
    1. Kumar A, Franek E, Wise J, Niemeyer M, Mersebach H, Simo R. Efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus insulin glargine (U100) for 52 weeks in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163350.
    1. Kumar S, Jang HC, Demirag NG, Skjoth TV, Endahl L, Bode B. Efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart compared with once-daily insulin glargine in participants with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized, treat-to-target study. Diabet Med. 2017;34:180–188. doi: 10.1111/dme.13125.
    1. Philis-Tsimikas A, Astamirova K, Gupta Y, et al. Similar glycaemic control with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia in a 38-week trial comparing the IDegAsp co-formulation with insulin glargine U100 and insulin aspart in basal insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;147:157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.10.024.
    1. Fulcher GR, Christiansen JS, Bantwal G, et al. Comparison of insulin degludec/insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart 30 in uncontrolled, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a phase 3a, randomized, treat-to-target trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2084–2090. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2908.
    1. Onishi Y, Ono Y, Rabol R, Endahl L, Nakamura S. Superior glycaemic control with once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral drugs: a randomized, controlled phase 3 trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:826–832. doi: 10.1111/dom.12097.
    1. Onishi Y, Yamada K, Zacho J, Ekelund J, Iwamoto Y. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. J Diabetes Investig. 2017;8:210–217. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12569.
    1. Taneda S, Hyllested-Winge J, Gall MA, Kaneko S, Hirao K. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 twice daily in insulin-experienced Japanese subjects with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: subgroup analysis of a Pan-Asian, treat-to-target Phase 3 Trial. J Diabetes. 2017;9:243–247. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12407.
    1. Cohen AT, Goto S, Schreiber K, Torp-Pedersen C. Why do we need observational studies of everyday patients in the real-life setting? Eur Heart J Suppl. 2015;17:D2–8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suv035.
    1. World Medical Association World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
    1. Public Policy Committee ISoP Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practice (GPP) Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25:2–10. doi: 10.1002/pds.3891.
    1. European Medicines Agency and Heads of Medicines Agencies. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP). Module VI – collection, management and submission of reports of suspected adverse reactions to medicinal products (Rev 2). 2017. . Accessed Jan 2021.
    1. Ogasawara K. 8. Revised “ethical guidelines for medical and health research involving human subjects”. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2017;73:397–402. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2017_JSRT_73.5.397.
    1. Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, et al. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:1845–1859. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-4127.
    1. Japan Diabetes Society Committee Report: glycemic targets for elderly patients with diabetes: Japan Diabetes Society (JDS)/Japan Geriatrics Society (JGS) Joint Committee on improving care for elderly patients with diabetes. J Diabetes Investig. 2017;8:126–128. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12599.
    1. Munshi MN, Pandya N, Umpierrez GE, DiGenio A, Zhou R, Riddle MC. Contributions of basal and prandial hyperglycemia to total hyperglycemia in older and younger adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:535–541. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12167.
    1. Fujimoto K, Iwakura T, Aburaya M, Matsuoka N. Twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart effectively improved morning and evening glucose levels and quality of life in patients previously treated with premixed insulin: an observational study. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018;10:64. doi: 10.1186/s13098-018-0366-x.
    1. Russell-Jones D, Pouwer F, Khunti K. Identification of barriers to insulin therapy and approaches to overcoming them. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:488–496. doi: 10.1111/dom.13132.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner