Design of the xylitol for adult caries trial (X-ACT)

James D Bader, Daniel A Shugars, William M Vollmer, Christina M Gullion, Gregg H Gilbert, Bennett T Amaechi, John P Brown, James D Bader, Daniel A Shugars, William M Vollmer, Christina M Gullion, Gregg H Gilbert, Bennett T Amaechi, John P Brown

Abstract

Background: Dental caries incidence in adults is similar to that in children and adolescents, but few caries preventive agents have been evaluated for effectiveness in adults populations. In addition, dentists direct fewer preventive services to their adult patients. Xylitol, an over-the-counter sweetener, has shown some potential as a caries preventive agent, but the evidence for its effectiveness is not yet conclusive and is based largely on studies in child populations.

Methods/design: X-ACT is a three-year, multi-center, placebo controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial that tests the effects of daily use of xylitol lozenges versus placebo lozenges on the prevention of adult caries. The trial has randomized 691 participants (ages 21-80) to the two arms. The primary outcome is the increment of cavitated lesions.

Discussion: This trial should help resolve the overall issue of the effectiveness of xylitol in preventing caries by contributing evidence with a low risk of bias. Just as importantly, the trial will provide much-needed information about the effectiveness of a promising caries prevention agent in adults. An effective xylitol-based caries prevention intervention would represent an easily disseminated method to extend caries prevention to individuals not receiving caries preventive treatment in the dental office.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT00393055.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial Design and Participant Contacts.

References

    1. Thomson WM. Dental caries experience in older people over time: what can the large cohort studies tell us? Brit Dent J. 2004;196:89–92. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810900.
    1. Bader JD, Shugars DA, White BA, Rindal DB. Evaluation of audit-based performance measures for dental for dental care plans. J Public Health Dent. 1999;79:150–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1999.tb03264.x.
    1. Riley JL, Gordan VV, Rindal DB, Fellows JL, Ajmo CT, Amundson C, Anderson GA, Gilbert GH. for The Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Preferences for caries prevention agents in adult patients: findings from the dental practice-based research network. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010;38:360–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00547.x.
    1. National Institutes of Health, Office of Medical Application of Research. Consensus Development Conference Statement: Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life. 2001.
    1. Lingström P, Holm AK, Mejàre I, Twetman S, Söder B, Norlund A, Axelsson S, Lagerlöf F, Nordenram G, Petersson LG, Dahlgren H, Källestål C. Dietary factors in the prevention of dental caries: a systematic review. Acta Odont Scand. 2003;61:331–340. doi: 10.1080/00016350310007798.
    1. Maguire A, Rugg-Gunn AJ. Xylitol and caries prevention--is it a magic bullet? Brit Dent J. 2003;194:429–436. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810022.
    1. van Loveren C. Sugar alcohols: what is the evidence for caries-preventive and caries-therapeuticeffects? Caries Res. 2004;38:286–923. doi: 10.1159/000077768.
    1. Makinen KK, Pemberton D, Cole J, Makinen PL, Chen CY, Lambert P. Saliva stimulants and the oral health of geriatric patients. Adv Dent Res. 1995;9:125–126. doi: 10.1177/08959374950090020901.
    1. Ly KA, Riedy CA, Milgrom P, Rothen M, Roberts MC, Zhou L. Xylitol gummy bear snacks: a school-based randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-8-20.
    1. Ulmer M, Robinaugh D, Friedberg JD, Lipsitz SR, Natarajan S. Usefulness of a run-in period to reduce drop-outs in a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008;29:705–710. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.04.005.
    1. Bader JD, Robinson DS, Gilbert GH, Ritter AV, Makhija SK, Funkhouser KA, Amaechi BT, Shugars DA, Laws R. Four "lessons learned" while implementing a multi-site caries prevention trial. J Public Health Dent. 2010. in press .
    1. Pitts NB, Fyffe HE. The effect of varying diagnostic thresholds upon clinical caries data for a low prevalence group. J Dent Res. 1988;67:592–596.
    1. Ismail A, Banting D, Eggertsson H, Ekstrand K, Ferreira-Zandona A, Longbottom C, Pitts N, Reich E, Ricketts D, Selwitz R, Sohn W, Topping G, Zero D. In: Proceedings of the 7th Indiana Conference. Stookey GK, editor. Indianapolis: Indiana University; 2005. Rationale and evidence for the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) pp. 161–221.
    1. International Caries Detection and Assessment System Coordinating Committee. Criteria Manual: International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) Report of a Workshop Baltimore, MD. 2005.
    1. International Conference on Harmonisations. Guidance for Industry. E6 Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guidance.
    1. Griffin S, Griffin P, Swann J, Zlobin N. Estimating rates of new root caries in older adults. J Dent Res. 2004;83:634–638. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300810.
    1. Collins LM, Schafer JL, Kam C. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods. 2001;6:330–351. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330.
    1. Scheie AA, Fejerskov OB. Xylitol in caries prevention: what is the evidence for clinical efficacy? Oral Diseases. 1998;4:268–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1998.tb00291.x.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner