Ultrasound elastography in the head and neck. Part I. Basic principles and practical aspects

Kunwar S S Bhatia, Yolanda Y P Lee, Edmund H Y Yuen, Anil T Ahuja, Kunwar S S Bhatia, Yolanda Y P Lee, Edmund H Y Yuen, Anil T Ahuja

Abstract

Ultrasound elastography (USE) is a rapidly developing field of imaging that measures and displays tissue elasticity or stiffness properties using ultrasound. In recent years, real-time USE modes have appeared on commercially available clinical ultrasound machines, stimulating an explosion of research into potential oncologic and non-oncologic clinical applications of USE. Preliminary evidence suggests that USE can differentiate benign and malignant conditions accurately in several different tissues. This article presents an overview of the basic principles of different USE technologies that are currently under investigation in the head and neck region. In addition, more practical aspects pertaining to the optimal performance of USE at this site are discussed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Strain imaging schematic. A tissue containing a stiff lesion is compressed longitudinally by a transducer while performing US (a). Returning US signals are analysed to measure tissue displacements for different depths (b), which are converted to strain data (displacement/original length) (c). The graphs represent data from a single scan line through the middle of the lesion. The lesion shows minimal displacement and low strain compared with the reference tissue. The resulting strain data for multiple scan lines is displayed graphically as an elastogram corresponding to relative strain (d). This lesion is conspicuous on the elastogram due to its difference in strain compared with the surrounding tissue.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram showing a qualitative scoring system for lesions assessed using strain elastography. The lesion’s margin on the corresponding B mode image is shown by the dotted line. Lesions are visually graded from ES1 to ES5 based on the relative proportion of low strain (red) and high strain (green) areas. Low and high ES scores suggest a soft and stiff lesion compared with the surrounding tissue, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Strain elastogram with the corresponding gray-scale US image of a benign hyperplastic thyroid nodule (white arrow) showing a colour-coded map and ROIs placed to calculate the strain ratio. An ROI is placed in the nodule and the surrounding parenchyma. The SR was 1.43, which indicates a stiffer lesion than the normal parenchyma.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic illustration of shear wave imaging. (a) An elastography ROI (black box) is placed over a mass on the gray-scale US image. (b) High-intensity acoustic impulses (orange arrows) are transmitted into the tissue, which induce shear waves (blue). (c) Diagnostic impulses (green arrows) track shear wave propagation. In this example, shear waves travel faster in the mass than the background parenchyma. (d) The SWE map displays the mass on the basis of its stiffness contrast compared with the adjacent parenchyma.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Longitudinal US image of a thyroid lobe in a patient with multinodular goitre showing ARFI measurement in a region of normal thyroid parenchyma (white arrow). The ROI for ARFI measurement is a square box of fixed dimensions (∼5 × 5 mm). The mean ARFI velocity for the ROI is 1.79 m/s. This system does not generate elastograms. Image provided courtesy of Dr Chander Lulia, Ria Clinic, Mumbai.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Transverse gray-scale US image with corresponding shear wave elastogram of a hypoechoic thyroid nodule (white arrow), which was confirmed to be a benign hyperplastic degenerative nodule. ROIs are placed in the nodule and adjacent parenchyma (black arrow). The mean SWE stiffness of the nodule is 11.1 kPa and of the parenchyma is 16.4 kPa.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Transverse gray-scale US image with corresponding shear wave elastogram of a hypoechoic parotid nodule (black arrow), which was confirmed to be a pleomorphic adenoma. There is focal stress concentration in the superficial tissues overlying the nodule, seen here as regions of red colour on the elastogram (white arrows). Some of the high stiffness areas appear to extend into the superficial aspect of the nodule. Stress concentration may be problematic for assessing superficial head and neck lesions that produce a marked convex bulge of the skin.

References

    1. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13:111–134. PMid:1858217.
    1. Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: The BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 2012;262:435–449. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110640. . PMid:22282182.
    1. Garra BS. Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q. 2007;23:255–268. doi: 10.1097/ruq.0b013e31815b7ed6. . PMid:18090836.
    1. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239:341–350. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2391041676. . PMid:16484352.
    1. Ueno E, Ito A. Diagnosis of breast cancer by elasticity imaging. Eizo Joho Medical. 2004;36:2–6.
    1. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, et al. Elastic moduli of thyroid tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging. 2005;27:101–110. doi: 10.1177/016173460502700204. . PMid:16231839.
    1. Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29:427–435. doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00733-0. . PMid:12706194.
    1. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging–clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology. 2006;238:425–437. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2381041336. . PMid:16436810.
    1. Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB, 2nd, Svensson WE, Balleyguier C, Smith C. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:281–287. PMid:22298872.
    1. Luo S, Lim DJ, Kim Y. Objective ultrasound elastography scoring of thyroid nodules using spatiotemporal strain information. Med Phys. 2012;39:1182–1189. doi: 10.1118/1.3679857. . PMid:22380349.
    1. Palmeri ML, Nightingale KR. Acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging methods. Interface Focus. 2011;1:553–564. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0023. . PMid:22419986.
    1. Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51:396–409. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2004.1295425. . PMid:15139541.
    1. Azizi G, Keller J, Lewis Pa M, Puett DW, Rivenbark K, Malchoff CD. Performance of elastography for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: a prospective study. Thyroid. 2012 Nov 8. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Bhatia KS, Rasalkar DP, Lee YP, et al. Cystic change in thyroid nodules: a confounding factor for real-time qualitative thyroid ultrasound elastography. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:799–807. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.011. . PMid:21530955.
    1. Bhatia KS, Tong CS, Cho CC, Yuen EH, Lee YY, Ahuja AT. Shear wave elastography of thyroid nodules in routine clinical practice: preliminary observations and utility for detecting malignancy. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2397–2406. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2495-1. . PMid:22645042.
    1. Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Tong CS, Lee YY, Yuen EH, Ahuja AT. Shear wave elastography of focal salivary gland lesions: preliminary experience in a routine head and neck US clinic. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:957–965. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2364-3. . PMid:22200901.
    1. Slapa RZ, Piwowonski A, Jakubowski WS, et al. Shear wave elastography may add a new dimension to ultrasound evaluation of thyroid nodules: case series with comparative evaluation. J Thyroid Res. 2012:657147. PMid:22685685.
    1. Barr RG, Zhang Z. Effects of precompression on elasticity imaging of the breast: development of a clinically useful semiquantitative method of precompression assessment. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:895–902. PMid:22644686.
    1. Park SH, Kim SJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Son EJ, Kwak JY. Interobserver agreement in assessing the sonographic and elastographic features of malignant thyroid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:W416–W423. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2541. . PMid:19843721.
    1. Ragazzoni F, Deandrea M, Mormile A, et al. High diagnostic accuracy and interobserver reliability of real-time elastography in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:1154–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.025. . PMid:22542262.
    1. Merino S, Arrazola J, Cardenas A, et al. Utility and interobserver agreement of ultrasound elastography in the detection of malignant thyroid nodules in clinical care. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:2142–2148. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2716. . PMid:22051809.
    1. Kim JK, Baek JH, Lee JH, et al. Ultrasound elastography for thyroid nodules: a reliable study? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:1508–1513. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.05.017. . PMid:22766122.
    1. Lim DJ, Luo S, Kim MH, Ko SH, Kim Y. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility in thyroid ultrasound elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:896–901. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7009. . PMid:22451558.
    1. Veyrieres JB, Albarel F, Lombard JV, et al. A threshold value in Shear Wave elastography to rule out malignant thyroid nodules: a reality? Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3965–3972. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.09.002. . PMid:23031543.
    1. Zhang YF, Xu HX, He Y, et al. Virtual touch tissue quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse: a new ultrasound elastic imaging in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049094. . PMid:23152855.
    1. Bhatia K, Tong CS, Cho CC, Yuen EH, Lee J, Ahuja AT. Reliability of Shear Wave ultrasound elastography for neck lesions identified in routine clinical practice. Ultraschall Med. 2012 Sep 21. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Sebag F, Vaillant-Lombard J, Berbis J, et al. Shear wave elastography: a new ultrasound imaging mode for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:5281–5288. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0766. . PMid:20881263.
    1. Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Yuen YH, Rasalkar DD, King AD, Ahuja AT. Real-time qualitative ultrasound elastography of cervical lymph nodes in routine clinical practice: interobserver agreement and correlation with malignancy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1990–1997. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.08.016. . PMid:20950927.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner