Non-randomized therapy trial to determine the safety and efficacy of heavy ion radiotherapy in patients with non-resectable osteosarcoma

Claudia Blattmann, Susanne Oertel, Daniela Schulz-Ertner, Stefan Rieken, Sabine Haufe, Volker Ewerbeck, Andreas Unterberg, Irini Karapanagiotou-Schenkel, Stephanie E Combs, Anna Nikoghosyan, Marc Bischof, Oliver Jäkel, Peter Huber, Andreas E Kulozik, Jürgen Debus, Claudia Blattmann, Susanne Oertel, Daniela Schulz-Ertner, Stefan Rieken, Sabine Haufe, Volker Ewerbeck, Andreas Unterberg, Irini Karapanagiotou-Schenkel, Stephanie E Combs, Anna Nikoghosyan, Marc Bischof, Oliver Jäkel, Peter Huber, Andreas E Kulozik, Jürgen Debus

Abstract

Background: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents. For effective treatment, local control of the tumor is absolutely critical, because the chances of long term survival are <10% and might effectively approach zero if a complete surgical resection of the tumor is not possible. Up to date there is no curative treatment protocol for patients with non-resectable osteosarcomas, who are excluded from current osteosarcoma trials, e.g. EURAMOS1. Local photon radiotherapy has previously been used in small series and in an uncontrolled, highly individualized fashion, which, however, documented that high dose radiotherapy can, in principle, be used to achieve local control. Generally the radiation dose that is necessary for a curative approach can hardly be achieved with conventional photon radiotherapy in patients with non-resectable tumors that are usually located near radiosensitive critical organs such as the brain, the spine or the pelvis. In these cases particle Radiotherapy (proton therapy (PT)/heavy ion therapy (HIT) may offer a promising new alternative. Moreover, compared with photons, heavy ion beams provide a higher physical selectivity because of their finite depth coverage in tissue. They achieve a higher relative biological effectiveness. Phase I/II dose escalation studies of HIT in adults with non-resectable bone and soft tissue sarcomas have already shown favorable results.

Methods/design: This is a monocenter, single-arm study for patients > or = 6 years of age with non-resectable osteosarcoma. Desired target dose is 60-66 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (Gy E) with 45 Gy PT (proton therapy) and a carbon ion boost of 15-21 GyE. Weekly fractionation of 5-6 x 3 Gy E is used. PT/HIT will be administered exclusively at the Ion Radiotherapy Center in Heidelberg. Furthermore, FDG-PET imaging characteristics of non-resectable osteosarcoma before and after PT/HIT will be investigated prospectively. Systemic disease before and after PT/HIT is targeted by standard chemotherapy protocols and is not part of this trial.

Discussion: The primary objectives of this trial are the determination of feasibility and toxicity of HIT. Secondary objectives are tumor response, disease free survival and overall survival. The aim is to improve outcome for patients with non-resectable osteosarcoma.

Trial registration: Registration number (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT01005043.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chronological course of the therapy trial. HIT/PT will be administered at least one week after the last chemotherapy cycle on 6 days per week. Chemotherapy prior and after HIT/PT is recommended according to standard therapy protocols and is not part of this trial protocol. After the end of HIT/PT, adjuvant chemotherapy can be continued within one week. Diagnostic investigations have to be done at a specific date pre and after HIT/PT. FDG-PET characteristics will be evaluated prospectively.

References

    1. Bielack S, Wulff B, Delling G, Gobel U, Kotz R, Ritter J, Winkler K. Osteosarcoma of the trunk treated by multimodal therapy: experience of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma study group (COSS) Med Pediatr Oncol. 1995;24:6–12. doi: 10.1002/mpo.2950240103.
    1. Flege S, Kuhlen M, Paulussen M, Bielack S, Juergens H. Surgery of primary malignant bone tumors. Orthopäde. 2003;32:940–8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0555-6.
    1. Oya N, Kokubo M, Mizowaki T, Shibamoto Nagata Y, Sasai K, Nishimura Y, Tsuboyama T, Toquchida J, Nakamura T, Hiraoka M. Definitive intraoperative very high dose radiotherapy for localized osteosarcoma in the extrimities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:51–87.
    1. Kamada T, Tsujii H, Tsuji H, Yanagi T, Mizoe JE, Miyamoto T, Kato H, Yamada S, Morita S, Yoshikawa K, Kandatsu S, Tateishi A. Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy in bone and soft tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4466–71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.10.050.
    1. Zhang H, Yoshikawa K, Tamura K, Tomemori T, Sagou K, Tian M, Kandatsu S, Kamada T, Tsuji H, Suhara T, Suzuki K, Tanada S, Tsujii H. [(11)C]methionine positron emission tomography and survival in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas treated by carbon ion radiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1764–72. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0190-3.
    1. Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Spooner D, Mangham DC, Kabukcuoglu Y. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:796–802. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9241.
    1. Kawai A, Huvos AG, Meyers PA, Healey JH. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. Oncologic results of 40 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:196–207. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199803000-00030.
    1. Schulz-Ertner D, Nikoghosyan A, Didinger B, Debus J. Carbon ion radiation therapy for chordomas and low grade chondrosarcomas--current status of the clinical trials at GSI. Radiother Oncol. 2004;73(Suppl 2):53–56. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(04)80014-8.
    1. Schulz-Ertner D, Karger CP, Feuerhake A, Nikoghosyan A, Combs SE, Jakel O, Edler L, Scholz M, Debus J. Effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of skull-base chordomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:449–57.
    1. Hawkins DS, Rajendran JG, Conrad EU, Bruckner JD, Eary JF. Evaluation of chemotherapy response in pediatric bone sarcomas by [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. Cancer. 2002;94:3277–84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10599.
    1. Eary JF, Conrad EU, Bruckner JD, Folpe A, Hunt KJ, Mankoff DA, Howlett AT. Quantitative (F-19) fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in pretreatment evaluation and grading of sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:1215–1220.
    1. Folpe AL, Lyles RH, Sprouse JT, Conrad EU, Eary JF. (F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a predictor pathologic grade and other prognostic variables in bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:1279–1287.
    1. Gehan EA, Tefft MC. Will there be resistance to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:179–81. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.179.
    1. Tsujiih, Mizoe J, Kamada T, Baba B, Tsuji h, Katoh S, Yamada S, Yasuda S, Ohno T, Yanagi T, Imair, Kagei K, Kato H, Hara R, Hasegawa A, Nakajima M, Suganen, Tamakin, Takagir, Kandatsu S, Yoshikaw K, Kishomoto R, Miyamoto T. Clinical Results of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy at NIRS. J Radiation Research. 2007;48(Suppl A):A1–A13. doi: 10.1269/jrr.48.A1.
    1. Jäkel O, Schulz-Ertner D, Debus J. Specifying Carbon Ion Doses for Radiotherapy: the Heidelberg Approach. J Radiat Res. 2007;48(Suppl A):87–95. doi: 10.1269/jrr.48.A87.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner