Multiple sclerosis in older adults: the clinical profile and impact of interferon Beta treatment

Afsaneh Shirani, Yinshan Zhao, John Petkau, Paul Gustafson, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim, Charity Evans, Elaine Kingwell, Mia L van der Kop, Joel Oger, Helen Tremlett, Afsaneh Shirani, Yinshan Zhao, John Petkau, Paul Gustafson, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim, Charity Evans, Elaine Kingwell, Mia L van der Kop, Joel Oger, Helen Tremlett

Abstract

Background: We examined (1) patient characteristics and disease-modifying drug (DMD) exposure in late-onset (LOMS, ≥50 years at symptom onset) versus adult-onset (AOMS, 18-<50 years) MS and (2) the association between interferon-beta (IFNβ) and disability progression in older relapsing-onset MS adults (≥50 years).

Methods: This retrospective study (1980-2004, British Columbia, Canada) included 358 LOMS and 5627 AOMS patients. IFNβ-treated relapsing-onset MS patients aged ≥50 (regardless of onset age, 90) were compared with 171 contemporary and 106 historical controls. Times to EDSS 6 from onset and from IFNβ eligibility were examined using survival analyses.

Results: LOMS patients (6%) were more likely to be male, with motor onset and a primary-progressive course, and exhibit faster progression and were less likely to take DMDs. Nonetheless, 57% were relapsing-onset, of which 31% were prescribed DMDs, most commonly IFNβ. Among older relapsing-onset MS adults, no significant association between IFNβ exposure and disability progression was found when either the contemporary (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.18-1.22) or historical controls (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.20-1.42) were considered.

Conclusion: LOMS differed clinically from AOMS. One-third of older relapsing-onset MS patients were prescribed a DMD. IFNβ exposure was not significantly associated with reduced disability in older MS patients.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multivariable Cox regression analysis of potential factors associated with time to reach confirmed and sustained EDSS 6 from onset of MS symptoms in patients with relapsing-onset (a) and primary-progressive (b) MS.  ∗Out of 5373 patients with relapsing-onset MS, 874 patients did not contribute to the analysis (i.e., were excluded from the analyses). Those included 640 patients who had already reached the outcome by first clinic assessment (i.e., were left-censored), 185 patients with no EDSS score recorded, and 49 patients who were censored before the earliest event. †Reference level = absence of the specific onset symptom. ‡Out of 612 patients with primary-progressive MS, 273 patients did not contribute to the analysis (including 234 patients who had already reached the outcome by first clinic assessment (i.e., left-censored), 33 patients with no EDSS score recorded, and 6 patients who were censored before the earliest event).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Selection of the interferon beta-treated and untreated cohorts aged ≥50 at interferon beta eligibility date. BCMS clinic, British Columbia Multiple Sclerosis clinic; DMD, disease-modifying drug; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; RRMS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; and SPMS, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.  ∗The sum of the individual reasons (numbers) exceeds the total number of patients in some boxes because some patients met more than one condition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multivariable time-dependent Cox regression analysis of potential factors affecting time to reach confirmed and sustained EDSS 6 for 90 interferon beta-exposed patients versus 171 contemporary controls aged ≥50 at baseline, with interferon beta treatment as a time-varying covariate (a). Results of the same analysis for 90 interferon beta-exposed patients and 106 historical controls (b).  ∗Ten patients who were censored before the earliest event did not contribute to the analysis. †266 person-years of interferon beta exposure and 151 person-years of untreated time (92 person-years before and 59 person-years after the initiation of interferon beta treatment). ‡597 person-years of untreated time. §Seven patients who were censored before the earliest event did not contribute to the analysis. ||694 person-years of untreated time.

References

    1. Compston A., Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. The Lancet. 2002;359(9313):1221–1231. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08220-x.
    1. Kingwell E., van der Kop M., Zhao Y., et al. Relative mortality and survival in multiple sclerosis: findings from British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2012;83(1):61–66. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300616.
    1. Marrie R. A., Yu N., Blanchard J., Leung S., Elliott L. The rising prevalence and changing age distribution of multiple sclerosis in Manitoba. Neurology. 2010;74(6):465–471. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cf6ec0.
    1. Arias M., Dapena D., Arias-Rivas S., et al. Late onset multiple sclerosis. Neurologia. 2011;26(5):291–296. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2010.09.008.
    1. Etemadifar M., Abtahi S.-H., Minagar A., Akbari M., Masaeli A., Tabrizi N. Lateonset multiple sclerosis in Isfahan, Iran. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2012;15(10):596–598.
    1. Kis B., Rumberg B., Berlit P. Clinical characteristics of patients with late-onset multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology. 2008;255(5):697–702. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0778-x.
    1. Lyon-Caen O., Izquierdo G., Marteau R., Lhermitte F., Castaigne P., Hauw J. J. Late onset multiple sclerosis. A clinical study of 16 pathologically proven cases. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 1985;72(1):56–60.
    1. Martinelli V., Rodegher M., Moiola L., Comi G. Late onset multiple sclerosis: clinical characteristics, prognostic factors and differential diagnosis. Neurological Sciences. 2004;25(supplement 4):S350–S355. doi: 10.1007/s10072-004-0339-8.
    1. Noseworthy J., Paty D., Wonnacott T., Feasby T., Ebers G. Multiple sclerosis after age 50. Neurology. 1983;33(12):1537–1544. doi: 10.1212/WNL.33.12.1537.
    1. Tremlett H., Devonshire V. Is late-onset multiple sclerosis associated with a worse outcome? Neurology. 2006;67(6):954–959. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237475.01655.9d.
    1. Polliack M. L., Barak Y., Achiron A. Late-onset multiple sclerosis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;49(2):168–171. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49038.x.
    1. Qiu W., Wu J.-S., Castley A., et al. Clinical profile and HLA-DRB1 genotype of late onset multiple sclerosis in Western Australia. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2010;17(8):1009–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.12.011.
    1. Poser C. M., Paty D. W., Scheinberg L. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Annals of Neurology. 1983;13(3):227–231. doi: 10.1002/ana.410130302.
    1. The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. I. Clinical results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 1993;43(4):655–661. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.4.655.
    1. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon beta-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. PRISMS (Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis) Study Group. The Lancet. 1998;352:1498–1504.
    1. Jacobs L. D., Cookfair D. L., Rudick R. A., et al. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis. The Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG) Annals of Neurology. 1996;39:285–294.
    1. Sadovnick A. D., Ebers G. C., Wilson R. W., Paty D. W. Life expectancy in patients attending multiple sclerosis clinics. Neurology. 1992;42(5):991–994. doi: 10.1212/WNL.42.5.991.
    1. Sweeney V. P., Sadovnick A. D., Brandejs V. Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 1986;13(1):47–51.
    1. Shirani A., Zhao Y., Karim M. E., et al. Association between use of interferon beta and progression of disability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2012;308(3):247–256. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7625.
    1. Tremlett H., Yousefi M., Devonshire V., Rieckmann P., Zhao Y. Impact of multiple sclerosis relapses on progression diminishes with time. Neurology. 2009;73(20):1616–1623. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181c1e44f.
    1. Tremlett H., Paty D., Devonshire V. Disability progression in multiple sclerosis is slower than previously reported. Neurology. 2006;66(2):172–177. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000194259.90286.fe.
    1. McDonald W. I., Compston A., Edan G., et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. 2001;50(1):121–127. doi: 10.1002/ana.1032.
    1. Lublin F. D., Reingold S. C., National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. Neurology. 1996;46(4):907–911. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.4.907.
    1. Kurtzke J. F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444–1452. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444.
    1. BC Ministry of Health. Data Extract. PharmaNet. BC Ministry of Health, Data Stewardship Committee; 2010. .
    1. British Columbia Ministry of Health. Discharge Abstract Database (Hospital Separations) Population Data BC; 2010. (Data Extract, MOH). .
    1. British Columbia Ministry of Health [creator] Medical Services Plan (MSP) Payment Information File. Population Data BC; 2010. .
    1. British Columbia Ministry of Health. Consolidation File (MSP Registration & Premium Billing) Population Data BC, Data Extract. MOH; 2009. .
    1. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada. Treatments—modifying the disease course. .
    1. Suissa S. Immortal time bias in observational studies of drug effects. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 2007;16(3):241–249. doi: 10.1002/pds.1357.
    1. Phadke J. G. Clinical aspects of multiple sclerosis in north-east Scotland with particular reference to its course and prognosis. Brain. 1990;113(6):1597–1628. doi: 10.1093/brain/113.6.1597.
    1. Awad A., Sütve O. Multiple sclerosis in the elderly patient. Drugs and Aging. 2010;27(4):283–294. doi: 10.2165/11532120-000000000-00000.
    1. Kappos L., Antel J., Comi G., et al. Oral fingolimod (FTY720) for relapsing multiple sclerosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;355(11):1124–1140. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa052643.
    1. Miller D. H., Khan O. A., Sheremata W. A., et al. A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;348(1):15–23. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa020696.
    1. Panitch H., Miller A., Paty D., Weinshenker B. Interferon beta-1b in secondary progressive MS: results from a 3-year controlled study. Neurology. 2004;63(10):1788–1795.
    1. Shirani A., Zhao Y., Kingwell E., Rieckmann P., Tremlett H. Temporal trends of disability progression in multiple sclerosis: findings from British Columbia, Canada (1975–2009) Multiple Sclerosis. 2012;18(4):442–450. doi: 10.1177/1352458511422097.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner