Development of Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Radiotracers with Improved Tumor Retention

Anastasia Loktev, Thomas Lindner, Eva-Maria Burger, Annette Altmann, Frederik Giesel, Clemens Kratochwil, Jürgen Debus, Frederik Marmé, Dirk Jäger, Walter Mier, Uwe Haberkorn, Anastasia Loktev, Thomas Lindner, Eva-Maria Burger, Annette Altmann, Frederik Giesel, Clemens Kratochwil, Jürgen Debus, Frederik Marmé, Dirk Jäger, Walter Mier, Uwe Haberkorn

Abstract

Cancer-associated fibroblasts constitute a vital subpopulation of the tumor stroma and are present in more than 90% of epithelial carcinomas. The overexpression of the serine protease fibroblast activation protein (FAP) allows a selective targeting of a variety of tumors by inhibitor-based radiopharmaceuticals (FAPIs). Of these compounds, FAPI-04 has been recently introduced as a theranostic radiotracer and demonstrated high uptake into different FAP-positive tumors in cancer patients. To enable the delivery of higher doses, thereby improving the outcome of a therapeutic application, several FAPI variants were designed to further increase tumor uptake and retention of these tracers. Methods: Novel quinoline-based radiotracers were synthesized by organic chemistry and evaluated in radioligand binding assays using FAP-expressing HT-1080 cells. Depending on their in vitro performance, small-animal PET imaging and biodistribution studies were performed on HT-1080-FAP tumor-bearing mice. The most promising compounds were used for clinical PET imaging in 8 cancer patients. Results: Compared with FAPI-04, 11 of 15 FAPI derivatives showed improved FAP binding in vitro. Of these, 7 compounds demonstrated increased tumor uptake in tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, tumor-to-normal-organ ratios were improved for most of the compounds, resulting in images with higher contrast. Notably two of the radiotracers, FAPI-21 and -46, displayed substantially improved ratios of tumor to blood, liver, muscle, and intestinal uptake. A first diagnostic application in cancer patients revealed high intratumoral uptake of both radiotracers already 10 min after administration but a higher uptake in oral mucosa, salivary glands, and thyroid for FAPI-21. Conclusion: Chemical modification of the FAPI framework enabled enhanced FAP binding and improved pharmacokinetics in most of the derivatives, resulting in high-contrast images. Moreover, higher doses of radioactivity can be delivered while minimizing damage to healthy tissue, which may improve therapeutic outcome.

Keywords: FAP inhibitor; PET/CT; fibroblast activation protein; theranostics; tracer development.

© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Relative binding rates of 177Lu-labeled FAPI derivatives compared with FAPI-04 (set to 100%) using FAP-expressing HT-1080 cells (n = 3).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Organ SUVmax of 68Ga-labeled FAPI derivatives in HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice determined by small-animal PET imaging (n = 1).
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Tumor–to–normal-organ ratios of 68Ga-labeled FAPI derivatives, calculated from AUCs 0–2 h after intravenous administration of radiotracers (n = 1).
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Organ uptake of 177Lu-labeled FAPI derivatives in HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice (n = 3). *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. ***P < 0.001.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Tumor–to–normal-organ ratios (calculated from %ID/g 0–24 h after intravenous administration) of 177Lu-labeled FAPI derivatives in HT-1080-FAP tumor–bearing mice (n = 3).
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Whole-body PET/CT imaging of tumor patients. (A–F) Maximum-intensity projections 1 h after intravenous administration of 68Ga-labeled FAPI-21 (A–C) and FAPI-46 (D–F). (G and H) Maximum (G) and mean (H) tracer uptake of 68Ga-labeled FAPI-21 and -46 in tumor and healthy organs as compared with FAPI-04 (n = 2–25) (Supplemental Table 4).

References

    1. Brennen WN, Isaacs JT, Denmeade SR. Rationale behind targeting fibroblast activation protein-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts as a novel chemotherapeutic strategy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:257–266.
    1. Puré E, Blomberg R. Pro-tumorigenic roles of fibroblast activation protein in cancer: back to the basics. Oncogene. 2018;37:4343–4357.
    1. Busek P, Mateu R, Zubal M, Kotackova L, Sedo A. Targeting fibroblast activation protein in cancer: prospects and caveats. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2018;23:1933–1968.
    1. Kilvaer TK, Khanehkenari MR, Hellevik T, et al. Cancer associated fibroblasts in stage I-IIIA NSCLC: prognostic impact and their correlations with tumor molecular markers. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134965.
    1. Loeffler M, Kruger JA, Niethammer AG, Reisfeld RA. Targeting tumor-associated fibroblasts improves cancer chemotherapy by increasing intratumoral drug uptake. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1955–1962.
    1. Ostermann E, Garin-Chesa P, Heider KH, et al. Effective immunoconjugate therapy in cancer models targeting a serine protease of tumor fibroblasts. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4584–4592.
    1. Tanswell P, Garin-Chesa P, Rettig WJ, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of antifibroblast activation protein monoclonal antibody F19 in cancer patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51:177–180.
    1. Scott AM, Wiseman G, Welt S, et al. A phase I dose-escalation study of sibrotuzumab in patients with advanced or metastatic fibroblast activation protein-positive cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:1639–1647.
    1. Welt S, Divgi CR, Scott AM, et al. Antibody targeting in metastatic colon cancer: a phase I study of monoclonal antibody F19 against a cell-surface protein of reactive tumor stromal fibroblasts. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1193–1203.
    1. Loktev A, Lindner T, Mier W, et al. A tumor-imaging method targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1423–1429.
    1. Lindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, et al. Development of quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1415–1422.
    1. Giesel FL, Kratochwil C, Lindner T, et al. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry estimate of 1 DOTA-containing FAP-targeting agents in patients with various cancers. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:386–392.
    1. Fischer E, Chaitanya K, Wuest T, et al. Radioimmunotherapy of fibroblast activation protein positive tumors by rapidly internalizing antibodies. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6208–6218.
    1. Jansen K, Heirbaut L, Cheng JD, et al. Selective inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) with a (4-quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine scaffold. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2013;4:491–496.
    1. Kalluri R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:582–598.
    1. Jacob M, Chang L, Puré E. Fibroblast activation protein in remodeling tissues. Curr Mol Med. 2012;12:1220–1243.
    1. Cremasco V, Astarita JL, Grauel AL, et al. FAP delineates heterogeneous and functionally divergent stromal cells in immune-excluded breast tumors. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018;6:1472–1485.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner