Online Peer-to-Peer Support for Young People With Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review

Kathina Ali, Louise Farrer, Amelia Gulliver, Kathleen M Griffiths, Kathina Ali, Louise Farrer, Amelia Gulliver, Kathleen M Griffiths

Abstract

Background: Adolescence and early adulthood are critical periods for the development of mental disorders. Online peer-to-peer communication is popular among young people and may improve mental health by providing social support. Previous systematic reviews have targeted Internet support groups for adults with mental health problems, including depression. However, there have been no systematic reviews examining the effectiveness of online peer-to-peer support in improving the mental health of adolescents and young adults.

Objective: The aim of this review was to systematically identify available evidence for the effectiveness of online peer-to peer support for young people with mental health problems.

Methods: The PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cochrane databases were searched using keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. Retrieved abstracts (n=3934) were double screened and coded. Studies were included if they (1) investigated an online peer-to-peer interaction, (2) the interaction discussed topics related to mental health, (3) the age range of the sample was between 12 to 25 years, and (4) the study evaluated the effectiveness of the peer-to-peer interaction.

Results: Six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for the current review. The studies targeted a range of mental health problems including depression and anxiety (n=2), general psychological problems (n=1), eating disorders (n=1), and substance use (tobacco) (n=2). The majority of studies investigated Internet support groups (n=4), and the remaining studies focused on virtual reality chat sessions (n=2). In almost all studies (n=5), the peer support intervention was moderated by health professionals, researchers or consumers. Studies employed a range of study designs including randomized controlled trials (n=3), pre-post studies (n=2) and one randomized trial. Overall, two of the randomized controlled trials were associated with a significant positive outcome in comparison to the control group at post-intervention. In the remaining four studies, peer-to-peer support was not found to be effective.

Conclusions: This systematic review identified an overall lack of high-quality studies examining online peer-to-peer support for young people. Given that peer support is frequently used as an adjunct to Internet interventions for a variety of mental health conditions, there is an urgent need to determine the effectiveness of peer support alone as an active intervention.

Keywords: Internet; Internet support groups; mental health; peer-to-peer support; systematic reviews; technology; young people.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: KG is a co-developer of MoodGYM, which was evaluated as part of one [26] of the included trials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study identification flowchart.

References

    1. Patel Vikram, Flisher Alan J, Hetrick Sarah, McGorry Patrick. Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. Lancet. 2007 Apr 14;369(9569):1302–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60368-7.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Young Australians: their health and wellbeing. 2011. [2015-03-10]. 2011 .
    1. Booth Michael L, Bernard Diana, Quine Susan, Kang Melissa S, Usherwood Tim, Alperstein Garth, Bennett David L. Access to health care among Australian adolescents young people's perspectives and their sociodemographic distribution. J Adolesc Health. 2004 Jan;34(1):97–103.
    1. Rickwood D, Deane FP, Wilson CJ, Ciarrochi J. Young people’s help-seeking for mental health problems. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health. 2005;4:1–34.
    1. Wetterlin FM, Mar MY, Neilson EK, Werker GR, Krausz M. eMental health experiences and expectations: a survey of youths' Web-based resource preferences in Canada. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12):e293. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3526.
    1. Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. [2015-03-10]. 2010 .
    1. Bauer Stephanie, Moessner Markus. Harnessing the power of technology for the treatment and prevention of eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Jul;46(5):508–15. doi: 10.1002/eat.22109.
    1. Campbell AJ, Robards F. Using technologies safely and effectively to promote young people's wellbeing: a better practice guide for services. [2015-03-10]. 2013 .
    1. Griffiths Km, Christensen H. Internet-based mental health programs: A powerful tool in the rural medical kit. Aust J Rural Health. 2007;15:81–87.
    1. King R, Bickman L, Shochet I, McDermott B, Bor B. Use of the internet for provision of better counselling and psychotherapy services to young people, their families and carers. Psychotherapy in Australia. 2010;17(1):66–74.
    1. Eysenbach Gunther, Powell John, Englesakis Marina, Rizo Carlos, Stern Anita. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166.
    1. Burns Jane M, Davenport Tracey A, Durkin Lauren A, Luscombe Georgina M, Hickie Ian B. The internet as a setting for mental health service utilisation by young people. Med J Aust. 2010 Jun 7;192(11 Suppl):S22–26.
    1. Tanis Martin. Health-related on-line forums: what's the big attraction? J Health Commun. 2008;13(7):698–714. doi: 10.1080/10810730802415316.
    1. Wright Kevin B, Bell Sally B, Wright Kevin B, Bell Sally B. Health-related Support Groups on the Internet: Linking Empirical Findings to Social Support and Computer-mediated Communication Theory. J Health Psychol. 2003 Jan;8(1):39–54. doi: 10.1177/1359105303008001429.
    1. Batenburg Anika, Das Enny. Emotional approach coping and the effects of online peer-led support group participation among patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(11):e256. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3517.
    1. Barak A, Dolev-Cohen M. Does activity level in online support groups for distressed adolescents determine emotional relief. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2006 Sep;6(3):186–190. doi: 10.1080/14733140600848203.
    1. Pfeiffer Paul N, Heisler Michele, Piette John D, Rogers Mary A M. Valenstein Marcia. Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011;33(1):29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.10.002.
    1. Griffiths Kathleen M, Calear Alison L, Banfield Michelle. Systematic review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and depression (1): Do ISGs reduce depressive symptoms? J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(3):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1270.
    1. Rice Simon M, Goodall Joanne, Hetrick Sarah E, Parker Alexandra G, Gilbertson Tamsyn, Amminger G Paul, Davey Christopher G, McGorry Patrick D, Gleeson John, Alvarez-Jimenez Mario. Online and social networking interventions for the treatment of depression in young people: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(9):e206. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3304.
    1. National Health and Research Council (NHMRC) [2015-04-12]. Research Keywords/Phrases .
    1. Moher David, Liberati Alessandro, Tetzlaff Jennifer, Altman Douglas G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264–9, W64.
    1. Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. [2015-03-10]. 2015 .
    1. Borenstein M. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. Effect sizes for continuous data; pp. 221–236.
    1. Low Kathryn Graff, Charanasomboon Swita, Lesser Jill, Reinhalter Katie, Martin Rachel, Jones Hannah, Winzelberg Andy, Abascal Liana, Taylor C Barr. Effectiveness of a computer-based interactive eating disorders prevention program at long-term follow-up. Eat Disord. 2006;14(1):17–30. doi: 10.1080/10640260500403816.
    1. Woodruff Susan I, Conway Terry L, Edwards Christine C, Elliott Sean P, Crittenden Jim. Evaluation of an Internet virtual world chat room for adolescent smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2007 Sep;32(9):1769–1786. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.12.008.
    1. Ellis LA, Campbell AJ, Sethi S, O'Dea BM. Comparative randomized trial of an online cognitive-behavioral therapy program and an online support group for depression and anxiety. J Cyber Ther Rehabil. 2011;4(4):461–467.
    1. Horgan Aine, McCarthy Geraldine, Sweeney John. An evaluation of an online peer support forum for university students with depressive symptoms. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2013 Apr;27(2):84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2012.12.005.
    1. Woodruff S I, Edwards C C, Conway T L, Elliott S P. Pilot test of an Internet virtual world chat room for rural teen smokers. J Adolesc Health. 2001 Oct;29(4):239–43.
    1. Freeman E, Barker C, Pistrang N. Outcome of an online mutual support group for college students with psychological problems. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11:591–593.
    1. Houston Thomas K, Cooper Lisa A, Ford Daniel E. Internet support groups for depression: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;159(12):2062–2068.
    1. Griffiths Kathleen M, Mackinnon Andrew J, Crisp Dimity A, Christensen Helen, Bennett Kylie, Farrer Louise. The effectiveness of an online support group for members of the community with depression: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e53244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053244.
    1. Barak A, Grohol JM, Pector E. BMJ. [2015-05-10]. Methodology, validity, and applicability: a critique on Eysenbach .

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner