Niraparib Maintenance Treatment Improves Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (TWiST) Versus Routine Surveillance in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A TWiST Analysis of the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA Trial

Ursula A Matulonis, Lydia Walder, Trine J Nøttrup, Paul Bessette, Sven Mahner, Marta Gil-Martin, Elsa Kalbacher, Jonathan A Ledermann, Robert M Wenham, Kathrine Woie, Susie Lau, Frederik Marmé, Antonio Casado Herraez, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Susana Banerjee, Gabriel Lindahl, Benedict Benigno, Joseph Buscema, Karin Travers, Holly Guy, Mansoor R Mirza, Ursula A Matulonis, Lydia Walder, Trine J Nøttrup, Paul Bessette, Sven Mahner, Marta Gil-Martin, Elsa Kalbacher, Jonathan A Ledermann, Robert M Wenham, Kathrine Woie, Susie Lau, Frederik Marmé, Antonio Casado Herraez, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Susana Banerjee, Gabriel Lindahl, Benedict Benigno, Joseph Buscema, Karin Travers, Holly Guy, Mansoor R Mirza

Abstract

Purpose: This study estimated time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) with niraparib compared with routine surveillance (RS) in the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Patients and methods: Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated for niraparib and RS by fitting parametric survival distributions to Kaplan-Meier data for 553 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who were enrolled in the phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline BRCA mutation-gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut cohorts. Mean time with toxicity was estimated based on the area under the Kaplan-Meier curve for symptomatic grade 2 or greater fatigue, nausea, and vomiting adverse events (AEs). Time with toxicity was the number of days a patient experienced an AE post-random assignment and before disease progression. TWiST was estimated as the difference between mean PFS and time with toxicity. Uncertainty was explored using alternative PFS estimates and considering all symptomatic grade 2 or greater AEs.

Results: In the gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut cohorts, niraparib treatment resulted in a mean PFS benefit of 3.23 years and 1.44 years, respectively, and a mean time with toxicity of 0.28 years and 0.10 years, respectively, compared with RS. Hence, niraparib treatment resulted in a mean TWiST benefit of 2.95 years and 1.34 years, respectively, compared with RS, which is equivalent to more than four-fold and two-fold increases in mean TWiST between niraparib and RS in the gBRCAmut and non-gBRCAmut cohorts, respectively. This TWiST benefit was consistent across all sensitivity analyses, including modeling PFS over 5-, 10-, and 15-year time horizons.

Conclusion: Patients who were treated with niraparib compared with RS experienced increased mean TWiST. Thus, patients who were treated with niraparib in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial experienced more time without symptoms or symptomatic toxicities compared with control.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01847274.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves for progression-free survival (PFS) and generalized gamma distributions over a 20-year time horizon for the (A) gBRCAmut and (B) non-gBRCAmut cohorts, and KM curves for time with toxicity (TOX) for the (C) gBRCAmut and (D) non-gBRCAmut cohorts. gBRCAmut, germline BRCA mutation; RS, routine surveillance.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier curves for time with toxicity (TOX), mean progression-free survival (PFS) generalized gamma distributions, and mean time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) for (A) niraparib and (B) routine surveillance (RS) in the gBRCAmut cohort and for (C) niraparib and (D) RS in the non-gBRCAmut cohort over a 20-year time horizon. gBRCAmut, germline BRCA mutation.

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer Population fact sheets.
    1. National Cancer Institute Cancer stat facts: Ovarian cancer.
    1. Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance Recurrence.
    1. Wright AA, Bohlke K, Armstrong DK, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3460–3473.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration Niraparib (ZEJULA)
    1. European Medicines Agency Niraparib. Annex 1: Summary of product characteristics.
    1. Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J, et al. Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2154–2164.
    1. Oza AM, Matulonis UA, Malander S, et al. Quality of life in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with niraparib versus placebo (ENGOT-OV16/NOVA): Results from a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1117–1125.
    1. Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A. A new endpoint for the assessment of adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1986;4:1772–1779.
    1. Friedlander M, Gebski V, Gibbs E, et al. Health-related quality of life and patient-centred outcomes with olaparib maintenance after chemotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT Ov-21): A placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1126–1134.
    1. RStudio Open source and enterprise-ready professional software for R.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Single technology appraisal: Niraparib for maintenance treatment of relapsed, platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NICE Decision Support Unit: Technical support document 14.
    1. Gourley C, Friedlander M, Matulonis UA, et al. Clinically significant long-term maintenance treatment with olaparib in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer (PSR SOC) J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl; abstr 5533)
    1. Royston P, Parmar MK. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat Med. 2002;21:2175–2197.
    1. Colombo N, Lorusso D, Scollo P. Impact of recurrence of ovarian cancer on quality of life and outlook for the future. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27:1134–1140.
    1. Hanker LC, Loibl S, Burchardi N, et al. The impact of second to sixth line therapy on survival of relapsed ovarian cancer after primary taxane/platinum-based therapy. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2605–2612.
    1. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Niraparib for maintenance treatment of relapsed, platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer.
    1. Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Scottish Medicines Consortium Niraparib tosylate monohydrate (Zejula)
    1. Berek JS, Matulonis UA, Peen U, et al. Safety and dose modification for patients receiving niraparib. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:1784–1792.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner