A novel protein glycan biomarker and future cardiovascular disease events

Akintunde O Akinkuolie, Julie E Buring, Paul M Ridker, Samia Mora, Akintunde O Akinkuolie, Julie E Buring, Paul M Ridker, Samia Mora

Abstract

Background: Glycosylated proteins partake in multiple cellular processes including inflammation. We hypothesized that GlycA, a novel biomarker of protein glycan N-acetyl groups, is related to incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), and we compared it with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Methods and results: In 27 491 initially healthy women, baseline GlycA was quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and hsCRP by an immunoturbidimetric assay. During median follow-up of 17.2 years, 1648 incident CVD events occurred (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, coronary revascularization, and CVD death). GlycA and hsCRP were moderately correlated (Spearman r=0.61, P<0.0001). In Cox regression models that included age, ethnicity, smoking, blood pressure, medications, menopausal status, body mass index, and diabetes, hazard ratios for CVD across quartiles 1 to 4 of GlycA were 1.00, 1.10 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.30), 1.34 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.58), and 1.64 (95% CI, 1.39 to 1.93), similar to hsCRP, for which hazard ratios were 1.00, 1.18 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.41), 1.35 (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.61), and 1.75 (95% CI, 1.47 to 2.09) (both Ptrend<0.0001). Associations were attenuated after additionally adjusting for lipids: the hazard ratio of quartile 4 versus 1 for GlycA was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.46; Ptrend=0.002) and for hsCRP was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.20 to 1.72; Ptrend<0.0001). Further adjustment for the other biomarker resulted in a hazard ratio of quartile 4 versus 1 for GlycA of 1.03 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.24; Ptrend=0.41) and for hsCRP of 1.29 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.56; Ptrend=0.001).

Conclusions: In this prospective study of initially healthy women, baseline GlycA was associated with incident CVD, consistent with a possible role for protein glycans in inflammation and CVD.

Clinical trial registration url: http//clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier NCT00000479.

Keywords: cardiovascular; epidemiology; glycoproteins; inflammation.

© 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier curves of incident CVD according to quartiles of GlycA (A) and hsCRP (B). Quartile concentrations were ≤326, 327 to 369, 370 to 416, and ≥417 μmol/L for GlycA and ≤0.81, 0.82 to 2.03, 2.04 to 4.38, and ≥4.39 mg/L for hsCRP. CVD indicates cardiovascular disease; hsCRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier curve of incident CVD according to joint levels of GlycA and hsCRP. High levels of GlycA were defined as greater than top tertile (>399 μmol/L). High levels of hsCRP were defined as >3 mg/L, according to clinical guidelines, which corresponded approximately to the top‐tertile value in this study. CVD indicates cardiovascular disease; hsCRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Hazard ratios for incident CVD events are shown on the y‐axis (log scale) for categories of GlycA and high‐sensitivity CRP (hsCRP). The hazard ratios are adjusted for age, ethnicity, smoking, systolic blood pressure, hypertensive medications, cholesterol treatment, postmenopausal status, use of hormone replacement therapy, body mass index, history of diabetes, trial treatment assignments, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and log triglycerides. Categories of GlycA are based on tertile cut points (<341, 341 to 399, and >399 μmol/L). Categories of hsCRP are based on clinical cut points (<1, 1 to 3, and >3 mg/L), as recommended by clinical guidelines. CRP indicates C‐reactive protein; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

References

    1. Marino K, Bones J, Kattla JJ, Rudd PM. A systematic approach to protein glycosylation analysis: A path through the maze. Nat Chem Biol. 2010; 6:713-723.
    1. van Kooyk Y, Rabinovich GA. Protein‐glycan interactions in the control of innate and adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2008; 9:593-601.
    1. Arnold JN, Wormald MR, Sim RB, Rudd PM, Dwek RA. The impact of glycosylation on the biological function and structure of human immunoglobulins. Ann Rev Immuno. 2007; 25:21-50.
    1. Ohtsubo K, Marth JD. Glycosylation in cellular mechanisms of health and disease. Cell. 2006; 126:855-867.
    1. Schachter H, Freeze HH. Glycosylation diseases: quo vadis? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009; 1792:925-930.
    1. Landsteiner K. Individual differences in human blood. Science. 1931; 73:403-409.
    1. Shriver Z, Raguram S, Sasisekharan R. Glycomics: a pathway to a class of new and improved therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004; 3:863-873.
    1. Arnold JN, Saldova R, Hamid UM, Rudd PM. Evaluation of the serum n‐linked glycome for the diagnosis of cancer and chronic inflammation. Proteomics. 2008; 8:3284-3293.
    1. Gornik O, Lauc G. Glycosylation of serum proteins in inflammatory diseases. Dis Markers. 2008; 25:267-278.
    1. Bell JD, Brown JC, Nicholson JK, Sadler PJ. Assignment of resonances for ‘acute‐phase’ glycoproteins in high resolution proton nmr spectra of human blood plasma. FEBS Lett. 1987; 215:311-315.
    1. Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM, Gordon D, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Buring JE. A randomized trial of low‐dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352:1293-1304.
    1. Mora S, Otvos JD, Rifai N, Rosenson RS, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Lipoprotein particle profiles by nuclear magnetic resonance compared with standard lipids and apolipoproteins in predicting incident cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation. 2009; 119:931-939.
    1. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, Buring JE, Cook NR. Comparison of c‐reactive protein and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1557-1565.
    1. Mora S, Lee IM, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Association of physical activity and body mass index with novel and traditional cardiovascular biomarkers in women. JAMA. 2006; 295:1412-1419.
    1. Marth JD, Grewal PK. Mammalian glycosylation in immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008; 8:874-887.
    1. Dube DH, Bertozzi CR. Glycans in cancer and inflammation–potential for therapeutics and diagnostics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005; 4:477-488.
    1. Hart GW, Copeland RJ. Glycomics hits the big time. Cell. 2010; 143:672-676.
    1. Fischer K, Kettunen J, Wurtz P, Haller T, Havulinna AS, Kangas AJ, Soininen P, Esko T, Tammesoo ML, Magi R, Smit S, Palotie A, Ripatti S, Salomaa V, Ala‐Korpela M, Perola M, Metspalu A. Biomarker profiling by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the prediction of all‐cause mortality: an observational study of 17,345 persons. PLoS Med. 2014; 11:e1001606.
    1. Varki A, Freeze HH. In: Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, Freeze HH, Stanley P, Bertozzi CR, Hart GW, Etzler ME. (eds.). Glycans in acquired human diseases. Essentials of Glycobiology. 2009Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor;
    1. Scott DW, Patel RP. Endothelial heterogeneity and adhesion molecules n‐glycosylation: implications in leukocyte trafficking in inflammation. Glycobiology. 2013; 23:622-633.
    1. Chacko BK, Scott DW, Chandler RT, Patel RP. Endothelial surface n‐glycans mediate monocyte adhesion and are targets for anti‐inflammatory effects of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma ligands. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286:38738-38747.
    1. Garcia‐Vallejo JJ, Van Dijk W, Van Het Hof B, Van Die I, Engelse MA, Van Hinsbergh VW, Gringhuis SI. Activation of human endothelial cells by tumor necrosis factor‐alpha results in profound changes in the expression of glycosylation‐related genes. J Cell Physiol. 2006; 206:203-210.
    1. Peng Y, Li J, Geng M. The glycan profile of endothelial cells in the present of tumor‐conditioned medium and potential roles of beta‐1,6‐glcnac branching on huvec conformation. Mol Cell Bbiochem. 2010; 340:143-152.
    1. Scott DW, Chen J, Chacko BK, Traylor JG, Jr, Orr AW, Patel RP. Role of endothelial n‐glycan mannose residues in monocyte recruitment during atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012; 32:e51-e59.
    1. Yin X, Subramanian S, Hwang SJ, O'Donnell CJ, Fox CS, Courchesne P, Muntendam P, Gordon N, Adourian A, Juhasz P, Larson MG, Levy D. Protein biomarkers of new‐onset cardiovascular disease: prospective study from the systems approach to biomarker research in cardiovascular disease initiative. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014; 34:939-945.
    1. Cahill LE, Levy AP, Chiuve SE, Jensen MK, Wang H, Shara NM, Blum S, Howard BV, Pai JK, Mukamal KJ, Rexrode KM, Rimm EB. Haptoglobin genotype is a consistent marker of coronary heart disease risk among individuals with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:728-737.
    1. Lee CW, Cheng TM, Lin CP, Pan JP. Plasma haptoglobin concentrations are elevated in patients with coronary artery disease. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e76817.
    1. Correale M, Totaro A, Abruzzese S, Di Biase M, Brunetti ND. Acute phase proteins in acute coronary syndrome: an up‐to‐date. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2012; 10:352-361.
    1. Nordestgaard BG, Adourian AS, Freiberg JJ, Guo Y, Muntendam P, Falk E. Risk factors for near‐term myocardial infarction in apparently healthy men and women. Clin Chem. 2010; 56:559-567.
    1. Ahmed MS, Jadhav AB, Hassan A, Meng QH. Acute phase reactants as novel predictors of cardiovascular disease. ISRN Inflamm. 2012; 2012:953461.
    1. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C‐reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342:836-843.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner