Saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial

Wesley H Self, Matthew W Semler, Jonathan P Wanderer, Jesse M Ehrenfeld, Daniel W Byrne, Li Wang, Leanne Atchison, Matthew Felbinger, Ian D Jones, Stephan Russ, Andrew D Shaw, Gordon R Bernard, Todd W Rice, Wesley H Self, Matthew W Semler, Jonathan P Wanderer, Jesse M Ehrenfeld, Daniel W Byrne, Li Wang, Leanne Atchison, Matthew Felbinger, Ian D Jones, Stephan Russ, Andrew D Shaw, Gordon R Bernard, Todd W Rice

Abstract

Background: Prior studies in critically ill patients suggest the supra-physiologic chloride concentration of 0.9% ("normal") saline may be associated with higher risk of renal failure and death compared to physiologically balanced crystalloids. However, the comparative effects of 0.9% saline and balanced fluids are largely unexamined among patients outside the intensive care unit, who represent the vast majority of patients treated with intravenous fluids.

Methods/design: This study, entitled Saline Against Lactated Ringer's or Plasma-Lyte in the Emergency Department (SALT-ED), is a pragmatic, cluster, multiple-crossover trial at a single institution evaluating clinical outcomes of adults treated with 0.9% saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid resuscitation in the emergency department. All adults treated in the study emergency department receiving at least 500 mL of isotonic crystalloid solution during usual clinical care and subsequently hospitalized outside the intensive care unit are included. Treatment allocation of 0.9% saline versus balanced crystalloids is assigned by calendar month, with study patients treated during the same month assigned to the same fluid type. The first month (January 2016) was randomly assigned to balanced crystalloids, with each subsequent month alternating between 0.9% saline and balanced crystalloids. For balanced crystalloid treatment, clinicians can choose either Lactated Ringer's or Plasma-Lyte A©. The study period is set at 16 months, which will result in an anticipated estimated sample size of 15,000 patients. The primary outcome is hospital-free days to day 28, defined as the number of days alive and out of the hospital from the index emergency department visit until 28 days later. Major secondary outcomes include proportion of patients who develop acute kidney injury by creatinine measurements; major adverse kidney events by hospital discharge or day 30 (MAKE30), which is a composite outcome of death, new renal replacement therapy, and persistent creatinine elevation >200% of baseline; and in-hospital mortality.

Discussion: This ongoing pragmatic trial will provide the most comprehensive evaluation to date of clinical outcomes associated with 0.9% saline compared to physiologically balanced fluids in patients outside the intensive care unit.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02614040 . Registered on 18 November 2015.

Keywords: Crystalloid; Emergency department; Intravenous fluids; Pragmatic trial; Renal failure; Saline.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of patient participation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of treatment allocation for the study emergency department. BC balanced crystalloids, NS 0.9% (“normal”) saline
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Electronic advisor embedded into the computerized provider order entry system alerting a clinician he/she has ordered 0.9% saline during a balanced fluid month. A similar electronic alert also informs clinicians when they have ordered balanced crystalloids during a 0.9% saline month

References

    1. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1243–1251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208627.
    1. Semler MW, Rice TW. Saline is not the first choice for crystalloid resuscitation fluids. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1541–1544. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001941.
    1. Young P. Saline is the solution for crystalloid resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1538–1540. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001844.
    1. Shaw AD, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL, et al. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg. 2012;255:821–829. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825074f5.
    1. Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Hegarty C, et al. Association between a chloride liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012;308:1566–1572. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13356.
    1. Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Glassford N, et al. Chloride-liberal vs. chloride restrictive intravenous fluid administration and acute kidney injury: An extended analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:257–264. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3593-0.
    1. Raghunathan K, Shaw A, Nathanson B, et al. Association between the choice of IV crystalloid and in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1585–1591. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000305.
    1. Shaw AD, Raghunathan K, Peyerl FW, et al. Association between intravenous chloride load during resuscitation and in-hospital mortality among patients with SIRS. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1897–1905. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3505-3.
    1. Rochwerg B, Alhazzani W, Sindi A, et al. for the Fluids in Sepsis and Septic Shock Group. Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:347–355. doi: 10.7326/M14-0178.
    1. Semler MW, Wanderer JP, Ehrenfeld JM, Stollings JL, Self WH, Siew ED, Wang L, Byrne DW, Shaw AD, Bernard GR, Rice TW. SALT Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in the Intensive Care Unit: The SALT Randomized Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 27749094.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Intravenous fluid therapy in adults in hospital. December 2013. . Accessed 24 Oct 2016.
    1. Campbell MJ, Walters SJ. How to design, analyse and report cluster randomised trials in medicine and health related research. Chichester: Wiley; 2014.
    1. Parienti JJ, Kuss O. Cluster-crossover design: A method for limiting clusters level effect in community-intervention studies. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:316–323. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.10.004.
    1. Ware JH, Hamel MB. Pragmatic trials—guides to better patient care? N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1685–1687. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1103502.
    1. Standardized Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT). . Accessed 04 Dec 2016.
    1. Lorenzo M, Davis JW, Negin S, Kaups K, Parks S, Brubaker D, Tyroch A. Can Ringer’s lactate be used safely with blood transfusions? Am J Surg. 1998;175:308–310. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00011-7.
    1. Semler MW, Rice TW, Shaw AD, Siew ED, Self WH, Kumar AB, et al. Identification of major adverse kidney events within the electronic health record. J Med Syst. 2016;40:167. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0528-z.
    1. Upchurch CP, Grijalva CG, Russ S, Collins SP, Semler MW, Rice TW, et al. Comparison of etomidate and ketamine for induction during rapid sequence intubation of adult trauma patients. Ann Emerg Med 2017;69:24–33.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.009.
    1. Schoenfeld DA, Bernard GR. Statistical evaluation of ventilator-free days as an efficacy measure in clinical trials of treatments for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1772–1777. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200208000-00016.
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2012;2(Suppl):1–138.
    1. Palevsky PM, Molitoris BA, Okusa MD, et al. Design of clinical trials in acute kidney injury: report from an NIDDK workshop on trial methodology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:844–850. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12791211.
    1. Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, et al. Statistics in medicine—reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2189–2194. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr077003.
    1. Zavada J, Hoste E, Cartin-Ceba R, et al. A comparison of three methods to estimate baseline creatinine for RIFLE classification. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:3911–3918. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp766.
    1. Pocock SJ. When (not) to stop a clinical trial for benefit. JAMA. 2005;294:2228–2230. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.17.2228.
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:580–637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner