Development of a Subcutaneous Fixed-Dose Combination of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab: Results From the Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study

Whitney P Kirschbrown, Chris Wynne, Matts Kågedal, Russ Wada, Hanbin Li, Bei Wang, Ihsan Nijem, Tanja Badovinac Crnjevic, Helena Gasser, Sarah Heeson, Jennifer Eng-Wong, Amit Garg, Whitney P Kirschbrown, Chris Wynne, Matts Kågedal, Russ Wada, Hanbin Li, Bei Wang, Ihsan Nijem, Tanja Badovinac Crnjevic, Helena Gasser, Sarah Heeson, Jennifer Eng-Wong, Amit Garg

Abstract

Adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab (both monoclonal antibodies targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]) has proven survival benefits when combined with chemotherapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab together in 1 vial for subcutaneous (SC) administration is being developed as a ready-to-use formulation to reduce the treatment burden on patients while improving healthcare efficiency. An open-label, 2-part, phase Ib dose-finding study (NCT02738970) was undertaken in healthy male volunteers (part 1) and female patients with HER2-postive early breast cancer who had completed standard (neo)adjuvant treatment (part 2). This study aimed to identify an SC pertuzumab dose given with recombinant human hyaluronidase that results in comparable exposure to that of the intravenous (IV) pertuzumab dose, based on pertuzumab serum trough concentration and area under the serum concentration-time curve. Pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a single dose of SC pertuzumab given alone or in a fixed-dose combination (comixed or coformulated) with trastuzumab were also assessed. A maintenance dose of 600 mg for SC pertuzumab resulted in an equivalent exposure to that of IV pertuzumab, and no new safety signals were identified for SC pertuzumab or trastuzumab. A loading dose of 1200 mg for SC pertuzumab was selected based on approximate dose proportionality. The PK and safety results support further development of a fixed-dose coformulation combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for SC administration, which will be investigated in an upcoming phase III trial in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.

Keywords: HER2-positive; breast cancer; dose-finding; pertuzumab; population pharmacokinetics; subcutaneous; trastuzumab.

© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design. arHuPH20 concentration = 2000 U/mL. brHuPH20 concentration = 667 U/mL. cCalculated to deliver a similar exposure to a 420 mg IV dose. dOnly if coformulated FDC is not feasible. FDC indicates fixed‐dose combination; IV, intravenous; PK, pharmacokinetics; rHuPH20, recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20; SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean serum pertuzumab concentration–time profiles (A), and geometric mean dose‐normalized serum pertuzumab concentration–time profiles (B) for pertuzumab with and without concomitant trastuzumab by cohort in healthy male volunteers (part 1). arHuPH20 concentration = 667 U/mL only. bCohorts 1, 3, and 4 (n = 18). cCohorts 6 and 7 (n = 12). Error bars represent the 95%CIs of the mean. GM indicates geometric mean; IV, intravenous; rHuPH20, recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20; SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phase III clinical trial simulations of SC/IV GMR and 90%CI estimates using part 1 data. Circles represent the GMR (SC/IV) Ctrough point estimates; horizontal solid lines represent the 90%CIs. Each circle/horizontal line represents a unique clinical trial simulation. Only 100 of the 400 clinical trial simulations are shown for clarity. Vertical dashed lines represent GMR 0.8–1.25. Ctrough indicates trough serum concentration; GMR, geometric mean ratio; IV, intravenous; SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean serum pertuzumab concentration–time profiles following 420 mg IV (part 1, cohort 1) and 600 mg SC doses in female patients with early breast cancer (part 2, cohort B) (A), and geometric mean dose‐normalized serum pertuzumab concentration–time profiles for pertuzumab comixed (part 2, cohort B) or coformulated (part 2, cohort C) as an SC fixed‐dose combination with trastuzumab in female patients with early breast cancer (B). Error bars represent the 95%CIs of the mean. GM indicates geometric mean; IV, intravenous; rHuPH20, recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20; SC, subcutaneous.

References

    1. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3997–4013.
    1. Ross JS, Slodkowska EA, Symmans WF, Pusztai L, Ravdin PM, Hortobagyi GN. The HER‐2 receptor and breast cancer: ten years of targeted anti‐HER‐2 therapy and personalized medicine. Oncologist. 2009;14(4):320–368.
    1. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2‐positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open‐label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):25–32.
    1. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, et al. 5‐year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early‐stage HER2‐positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open‐label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):791–800.
    1. von Minckwitz G, Procter M, de Azambuja E, et al. Adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in early HER2‐positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):122–131.
    1. Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim SB, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(2):109–119.
    1. Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):724–734.
    1. Hubalek M, Brantner C, Marth C. Role of pertuzumab in the treatment of HER2‐positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2012;4:65–73.
    1. Pivot X, Gligorov J, Müller V, et al. Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of trastuzumab in patients with HER2‐positive early breast cancer (PrefHer): an open‐label randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(10):962–970.
    1. Pivot X, Gligorov J, Müller V, et al. Patients' preferences for subcutaneous trastuzumab versus conventional intravenous infusion for the adjuvant treatment of HER2‐positive early breast cancer: final analysis of 488 patients in the international, randomized, two‐cohort PrefHer study. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(10):1979–1987.
    1. Rummel M, Kim TM, Plenteda C, et al. PrefMab: Final analysis of patient satisfaction with subcutaneous versus intravenous rituximab in previously untreated CD20+ diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma. Value Health. 2015;18(7):A469.
    1. Rummel M, Kim TM, Aversa F, et al. Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of rituximab among patients with untreated CD20+ diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma: results from a prospective, randomized, open‐label, crossover study (PrefMab). Ann Oncol. 2017;28(4):836–842.
    1. De Cock E, Pivot X, Hauser N, et al. A time and motion study of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab in patients with HER2‐positive early breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2016;5(3):389–397.
    1. De Cock E, Kritikou P, Sandoval M, et al. Time savings with rituximab subcutaneous injection versus rituximab intravenous infusion: a time and motion study in eight countries. PloS One. 2016;11(6):e0157957.
    1. Roche Registration Ltd . Herceptin® (trastuzumab). Summary of Product Characteristics. . Accessed September 4, 2018.
    1. Genentech Inc . Herceptin® (trastuzumab). Prescribing Information (USA). . Accessed September 4, 2018.
    1. Genentech Inc . Perjeta™ (pertuzumab). Prescribing Information (USA). . Accessed September 4, 2018.
    1. Woodward N, de Boer RH, Redfern A, et al. Interim results from the first open‐label, multicenter, phase IIIb study investigating the combination of pertuzumab with subcutaneous trastuzumab and a taxane in patients with HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (SAPPHIRE). Cancer Res. 2016;76(4 suppl):Abstract P4‐14‐12.
    1. Kümmel S, Crepelle‐Fléchais A, Schlegel M, et al. MetaPHER: A phase IIIb multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm safety study of subcutaneous trastuzumab, in combination with pertuzumab and docetaxel in patients with HER2‐positive advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76(4 suppl):Abstract OT3‐01‐13.
    1. Shivakumar SP, Anderson DR, Couban S. Catheter‐associated thrombosis in patients with malignancy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(29):4858–4864.
    1. Poorter RL, Lauw FN, Bemelman WA, Bakker PJM, Taat CW, Veenhof CHN. Complications of an implantable venous access device (Port‐a‐Cath) during intermittent continuous infusion of chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A(13):2262–2266.
    1. Ismael G, Hegg R, Muehlbauer S, et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2‐positive, clinical stage I‐III breast cancer (HannaH study): a phase 3, open‐label, multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(9):869–878.
    1. Davies A, Merli F, Mihaljević B, et al. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous rituximab versus intravenous rituximab for first‐line treatment of follicular lymphoma (SABRINA): a randomised, open‐label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4(6):e272–e282.
    1. Assouline S, Buccheri V, Delmer A, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of subcutaneous versus intravenous rituximab plus chemotherapy as treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (SAWYER): a phase 1b, open‐label, randomised controlled non‐inferiority trial. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3(3):e128–e138.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) . RITUXAN HYCELA™ (rituximab and hyaluronidase human). Prescribing Information (USA). . Accessed September 4, 2018.
    1. Jackisch C, Stroyakovskiy D, Pivot X, et al. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous or intravenous trastuzumab in patients with HER2‐positive early breast cancer after 5 years’ treatment‐free follow‐up: final analysis from the phase III, open‐label, randomized HannaH study. Cancer Res. 2017;78(4 suppl):Abstract PD3‐11 (and associated poster presentation).
    1. Davies A, Merli F, Mihaljevic B, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous rituximab in follicular lymphoma (SABRINA): stage 1 analysis of a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):343–352.
    1. Bookbinder LH, Hofer A, Haller MF, et al. A recombinant human enzyme for enhanced interstitial transport of therapeutics. J Control Release. 2006;114(2):230–241.
    1. Garg A, Quartino A, Li J, et al. Population pharmacokinetic and covariate analysis of pertuzumab, a HER2‐targeted monoclonal antibody, and evaluation of a fixed, non‐weight‐based dose in patients with a variety of solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74(4):819–829.
    1. Quartino AL, Hillenbach C, Li J, et al. Population pharmacokinetic and exposure‐response analysis for trastuzumab administered using a subcutaneous “manual syringe” injection or intravenously in women with HER2‐positive early breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77(1):77–88.
    1. Wynne C, Harvey V, Schwabe C, Waaka D, McIntyre C, Bittner B. Comparison of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of trastuzumab: a phase I/Ib trial in healthy male volunteers and patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(2):192–201.
    1. Jackisch C, Kim SB, Semiglazov V, et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous formulation of trastuzumab for HER2‐positive early breast cancer: updated results from the phase III HannaH study. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(2):320–325.
    1. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline‐containing and anthracycline‐free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2‐positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2278–2284.
    1. Gligorov J, Ataseven B, Verrill M, et al. Safety and tolerability of subcutaneous trastuzumab for the adjuvant treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐positive early breast cancer: SafeHer phase III study's primary analysis of 2573 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2017;82:237–246.
    1. Richter WF, Bhansali SG, Morris ME. Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration. AAPS J. 2012;14(3):559–570.
    1. Swain SM, Schneeweiss A, Gianni L, et al. Incidence and management of diarrhea in patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer treated with pertuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(4):761–768.
    1. Swain SM, Ewer MS, Viale G, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and standard anthracycline‐ and taxane‐based chemotherapy for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with HER2‐positive localized breast cancer (BERENICE): a phase II, open‐label, multicenter, multinational cardiac safety study. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(3):646–653.
    1. Hurvitz SA, Martin M, Symmans WF, et al. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab in patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer (KRISTINE): a randomised, open‐label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(1):115–126.
    1. Kamath AV. Translational pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of monoclonal antibodies. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2016;21‐22:75–83.
    1. Jackisch C, Hegg R, Stroyakovskiy D, et al. HannaH phase III randomised study: association of total pathological complete response with event‐free survival in HER2‐positive early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant‐adjuvant trastuzumab after 2 years of treatment‐free follow‐up. Eur J Cancer. 2016;62:62–75.
    1. Assouline S, Buccheri V, Delmer A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous rituximab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(5):1001–1009.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner