Mifepristone Antagonization With Progesterone to Prevent Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mitchell D Creinin, Melody Y Hou, Laura Dalton, Rachel Steward, Melissa J Chen, Mitchell D Creinin, Melody Y Hou, Laura Dalton, Rachel Steward, Melissa J Chen

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of mifepristone antagonization with high-dose oral progesterone.

Methods: We planned to enroll 40 patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. We enrolled patients at 44-63 days of gestation with ultrasound-confirmed gestational cardiac activity who were planning surgical abortion. Participants ingested mifepristone 200 mg and initiated oral progesterone 400 mg or placebo 24 hours later twice daily for 3 days, then once daily until their planned surgical abortion 14-16 days after enrollment. Follow-up visits were scheduled 3±1, 7±1, and 15±1 days after mifepristone intake with ultrasonography and blood testing for human chorionic gonadotropin and progesterone. Participants exited from the study when they had their surgical abortion or earlier for gestational cardiac activity absence, gestational sac expulsion, or medically indicated suction aspiration. We assessed the primary outcome of continued gestational cardiac activity at approximately 2 weeks (15±1 day), side effects after drug ingestion, and safety outcomes including hemorrhage and emergent treatment.

Results: We enrolled participants from February to July 2019 and stopped enrollment after 12 patients for safety concerns. Mean gestational age was 52.5 days. Two (one per group) voluntarily discontinued 3 days after mifepristone ingestion for subjective symptoms (nausea and vomiting, bleeding). Among the remaining 10 patients (five per group), gestational cardiac activity continued for 2 weeks in four in the progesterone group and two in the placebo group. One patient in the placebo group had no gestational cardiac activity 3 days after mifepristone use. Severe hemorrhage requiring ambulance transport to hospital occurred in three patients; one received progesterone (complete expulsion, no aspiration) and two received placebo (aspiration for both, one required transfusion). We halted enrollment after the third hemorrhage. No other significant side effects were reported.

Conclusion: We could not estimate the efficacy of progesterone for mifepristone antagonization due to safety concerns when mifepristone is administered without subsequent prostaglandin analogue treatment. Patients in early pregnancy who use only mifepristone may be at high risk of significant hemorrhage.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03774745.

References

    1. Jones RK, Witwer E, Jerman J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2017. Available at: . Accessed October 8, 2019.
    1. Danco Laboratories, LLC. Mifeprex®. 2016. Available at . Accessed October 8, 2019.
    1. Spitz IM, Bardin CW. Mifepristone (RU 486)—a modulator of progestin and glucocorticoid action. N Engl J Med 1993;329:404–12.
    1. Mahajan DK, London SN. Mifepristone (RU486): a review. Fertil Steril 1997;68:967–76.
    1. Hsia JK, Lohr PA, Taylor J, Creinin MD. Medical abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol between 64 and 70 days' gestation. Contraception 2019;100:178–81.
    1. Delgado G, Davenport ML. Progesterone use to reverse the effects of mifepristone. Ann Pharmacother 2012;46:e36.
    1. Garratt D, Turner JV. Progesterone for preventing pregnancy termination after initiation of medical abortion with mifepristone. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2017;22:472–5.
    1. Delgado G, Condly SJ, Davenport M, Tinnakornsrisuphap T, Mack J, Khauv V, et al. A case series detailing the successful reversal of the effects of mifepristone using progesterone. Issues Law Med 2018;33:3–13.
    1. Grossman D, White K, Harris L, Reeves M, Blumenthal PD, Winikoff B, et al. Continuing pregnancy after mifepristone and “reversal” of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review. Contraception 2015;92:206–11.
    1. Goldstein SR, Wolfson R. Endovaginal ultrasonographic measurement of early embryonic size as a means of assessing gestational age. J Ultrasound Med 1994;13:27–31.
    1. Maria B, Chaneac M, Stampf F, Ulmann A. Early pregnancy interruption using an antiprogesterone steroid: mifepristone (RU 486). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1988;17:1089–94.
    1. Upadhyay UD, Desai S, Zlidar V, Weitz TA, Grossman D, Anderson P, et al. Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:175–83.
    1. Sitruk-Ware R, Bricaire C, De Lignieres B, Yaneva H, Mauvais-Jarvis P. Oral micronized progesterone. Bioavailability pharmacokinetics, pharmacological and therapeutic implications—a review. Contraception 1987;36:373–402.
    1. Bernard N, Elefant E, Carlier P, Tebacher M, Barjhoux CE, Bos-Thompson MA, et al. Continuation of pregnancy after first-trimester exposure to mifepristone: an observational prospective study. BJOG 2013;120:568–74.
    1. Papaioannou GI, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, Ross JA, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasonographic prediction of early miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1685–92.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner