Randomized phase II adjuvant factorial study of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and/or thalidomide for glioblastoma

Marta Penas-Prado, Kenneth R Hess, Michael J Fisch, Lore W Lagrone, Morris D Groves, Victor A Levin, John F De Groot, Vinay K Puduvalli, Howard Colman, Gena Volas-Redd, Pierre Giglio, Charles A Conrad, Michael E Salacz, Justin D Floyd, Monica E Loghin, Sigmund H Hsu, Javier Gonzalez, Eric L Chang, Shiao Y Woo, Anita Mahajan, Kenneth D Aldape, W K Alfred Yung, Mark R Gilbert, MD Anderson Community Clinical Oncology Program, Brain Tumor Trials Collaborative, Mark R Gilbert, Morris D Groves, Victor A Levin, John F De Groot, Monica E Loghin, Vinay K Puduvalli, Howard Colman, Charles A Conrad, W K Alfred Yung, Ken Aldape, Omid Hamid, Nicholas Avgeropoulos, Elizabeth Maher, Robert Bachoo, Pamela New, George Corneliu Bobustuc, Herbert Bruce Newton, E Antonio Chiocca, Nina Paleologos, Karen L Fink, Surasak Phuphanich, Pierre Giglio, Jeffrey J Raizer, Marta Penas-Prado, Kenneth R Hess, Michael J Fisch, Lore W Lagrone, Morris D Groves, Victor A Levin, John F De Groot, Vinay K Puduvalli, Howard Colman, Gena Volas-Redd, Pierre Giglio, Charles A Conrad, Michael E Salacz, Justin D Floyd, Monica E Loghin, Sigmund H Hsu, Javier Gonzalez, Eric L Chang, Shiao Y Woo, Anita Mahajan, Kenneth D Aldape, W K Alfred Yung, Mark R Gilbert, MD Anderson Community Clinical Oncology Program, Brain Tumor Trials Collaborative, Mark R Gilbert, Morris D Groves, Victor A Levin, John F De Groot, Monica E Loghin, Vinay K Puduvalli, Howard Colman, Charles A Conrad, W K Alfred Yung, Ken Aldape, Omid Hamid, Nicholas Avgeropoulos, Elizabeth Maher, Robert Bachoo, Pamela New, George Corneliu Bobustuc, Herbert Bruce Newton, E Antonio Chiocca, Nina Paleologos, Karen L Fink, Surasak Phuphanich, Pierre Giglio, Jeffrey J Raizer

Abstract

Background: Chemoradiation, followed by adjuvant temozolomide, is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Adding other active agents may enhance treatment efficacy.

Methods: The primary objective of this factorial phase II study was to determine if one of 3 potential chemotherapy agents added to dose-dense temozolomide (ddTMZ) improves progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. A prior phase I trial established the safety of combining ddTMZ with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and/or thalidomide. Adults with good performance status and no evidence of progression post chemoradiation were randomized into 8 arms: ddTMZ alone (7 days on/7 days off) or doublet, triplet, and quadruplet combinations with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and thalidomide.

Results: The study enrolled 155 participants with a median age of 53 years (range, 18-84 y). None of the agents demonstrated improved PFS when compared with arms not containing that specific agent. There was no difference in PFS for triplet compared with doublet regimens, although a trend for improved overall survival (OS) was seen (20.1 vs 17.0 months, P = .15). Compared with ddTMZ, the ddTMZ + isotretinoin doublet had worse PFS (10.5 vs 6.5 months, P = .043) and OS (21.2 vs 11.7 months, P = .037). Trends were also seen for worse outcomes with isotretinoin-containing regimens, but there was no impact with celecoxib or thalidomide combinations. Treatment was well tolerated with expected high rates of lymphopenia.

Conclusions: The results do not establish a benefit for these combinations but indicate that adding isotretinoin to ddTMZ may be detrimental. This study demonstrated the feasibility and utility of the factorial design in efficiently testing drug combinations in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT00112502.

Keywords: celecoxib; factorial design; glioblastoma; isotretinoin; temozolomide; thalidomide.

© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Study design.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Progression-free survival (PFS) by agent versus no agent analysis.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) according to the number of agents (doublet versus triplet therapy).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Progression-free survival (PFS) according to treatment regimen (individual arms).

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner