Lipid Lowering Treatment and Eligibility for PCSK9 Inhibition in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients in Italy: Insights from Two Contemporary Nationwide Registries

Furio Colivicchi, Michele Massimo Gulizia, Marcello Arca, Pier Luigi Temporelli, Lucio Gonzini, Vanessa Venturelli, Nuccia Morici, Ciro Indolfi, Domenico Gabrielli, Leonardo De Luca, Furio Colivicchi, Michele Massimo Gulizia, Marcello Arca, Pier Luigi Temporelli, Lucio Gonzini, Vanessa Venturelli, Nuccia Morici, Ciro Indolfi, Domenico Gabrielli, Leonardo De Luca

Abstract

Introduction: The current use of lipid lowering therapies and the eligibility for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin-9 (PCSK9) inhibitors of patients surviving a myocardial infarction (MI) is poorly known.

Methods: Using the data from two contemporary, nationwide, prospective, real-world registries of patients with stable coronary artery disease, we sought to describe the lipid lowering therapies prescribed by cardiologists in patients with a prior MI and the resulting eligibility for PCSK9 inhibitors according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) and the Italian regulatory agency (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco; AIFA) criteria. The study cohort was stratified according to the following low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at the time of enrolment: <70 mg/dl; 70-99 mg/dl and ≥100 mg/dl.

Results: Among the 3074 post-MI patients with LDL-C levels available, a target level of LDL-C < 70 mg/dl was present in 1186 (38.6%), while 1150 (37.4%) had LDL-C levels ranging from 70 to 99 mg/dl and the remaining 738 (24.0%) an LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl. A statin was prescribed more frequently in post-MI patients with LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl (97.1%) compared to the other LDL-C groups (p < 0.0001). A low dose of statin was prescribed in 9.3%, while a high dose in 61.4% of patients. Statin plus ezetimibe association therapy was used in less than 18% of cases. In the overall cohort, 293 (9.8%) and 450 (22.2%) resulted eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors, according to ESC/EAS and AIFA criteria, respectively.

Conclusions: Post-MI patients are undertreated with conventional lipid lowering therapies. A minority of post-MI patients would be eligible to PCSK9 inhibitors according to ESC/EAS guidelines and Italian regulatory agency criteria.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have reported that no potential conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article. Dr De Luca and Dr Temporelli received speakers fees from Menarini, outside the submitted work.

Copyright © 2020 Furio Colivicchi et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Statin compounds prescribed at the time of discharge/end of the visit in post-MI patients according to LDL-C levels.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Associations of lipid lowering strategies† in post-MI patients according to LDL-C levels. †Other possible combinations not shown were used in less than 0.5% of cases.

References

    1. Jernberg T., Hasvold P., Henriksson M., Hjelm H., Thuresson M., Janzon M. Cardiovascular risk in post-myocardial infarction patients: nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long-term perspective. European Heart Journal. 2015;36(19):1163–1170. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu505.
    1. Baigent C., Blackwell L., Emberson J., et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. The Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–1681. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61350-5.
    1. Cannon C. P., Blazing M. A., Giugliano R. P., et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;372(25):2387–2397. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1410489.
    1. Roffi M., Patrono C., Collet J. P., et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European society of cardiology (ESC) European Heart Journal. 2016;37(3):267–315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320.
    1. Catapano A. L., Graham I., De Backer G., et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the task force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) developed with the special contribution of the European assocciation for cardiovascular prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR) Atherosclerosis. 2016;253:281–344. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.018.
    1. Stone N. J., Robinson J. G., Lichtenstein A. H., et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S1–S45. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a.
    1. Hirsh B. J., Smilowitz N. R., Rosenson R. S., Fuster V., Sperling L. S. Utilization of and adherence to guideline-recommended lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndrome: opportunities for improvement. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015;66(2):184–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.030.
    1. Penning-van Beest F. J., Termorshuizen F., Goettsch W. G., Klungel O. H., Kastelein J. J., Herings R. Adherence to evidence-based statin guidelines reduces the risk of hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction by 40%: a cohort study. European Heart Journal. 2007;28(2):154–159. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl391.
    1. Schultz J. S., O’Donnell J. C., McDonough K. L., Sasane R., Meyer J. Determinants of compliance with statin therapy and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in a managed care population. The American Journal of Managed Care. 2005;11:306–312.
    1. Chan D. C., Shrank W. H., Cutler D., et al. Patient, physician, and payment predictors of statin adherence. Medical Care. 2010;48(3):196–202. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c132ad.
    1. Navarese E. P., Kolodziejczak M., Schulze V., et al. Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015;163(1):40–51. doi: 10.7326/M14-2957.
    1. Lipinski M. J., Benedetto U., Escarcega R. O., et al. The impact of proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 serine protease inhibitors on lipid levels and outcomes in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia: a network meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. 2016;37(6):536–545. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv563.
    1. Sabatine M. S., Giugliano R. P., Keech A. C., et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;376(18):1713–1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615664.
    1. Schwartz G. G., Steg P. G., Szarek M., et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;379(22):2097–2107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801174.
    1. Landmesser U., John Chapman M., Farnier M., et al. European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society task force consensus statement on proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors: practical guidance for use in patients at very high cardiovascular risk. European Heart Journal. 2017;38(29):2245–2255. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw480.
    1. Elamin A. F. M., Grafton-Clarke C., Wen Chen K., et al. Potential use of PCSK9 inhibitors as a secondary preventative measure for cardiovascular disease following acute coronary syndrome: a UK real-world study. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2019;95(1120):61–66. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136171.
    1. De Luca L., Temporelli P. L., Lucci D., et al. Current management and treatment of patients with stable coronary artery diseases presenting to cardiologists in different clinical contexts: a prospective, observational, nationwide study. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2018;25(1):43–53. doi: 10.1177/2047487317740663.
    1. De Luca L., Piscione F., Colivicchi F., et al. Contemporary management of patients referring to cardiologists one to three years from a myocardial infarction: the EYESHOT post-MI study. International Journal of Cardiology. 2018;273:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.055.
    1. Law M. R., Wald N. J., Rudnicka R. Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;326(7404):1423–1427. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1423.
    1. Davidson M. H., Ballantyne C. M., Kerzner B., et al. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with statins: randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded experience in 2382 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2004;58(8):746–755. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2004.00289.x.
    1. Gencer B., Auer R., Nanchen D., et al. Expected impact of applying new 2013 AHA/ACC cholesterol guidelines criteria on the recommended lipid target achievement after acute coronary syndromes. Atherosclerosis. 2015;239(1):118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.049.
    1. Gitt A. K., Drexel H., Feely J., et al. Persistent lipid abnormalities in statin-treated patients and predictors of LDL-cholesterol goal achievement in clinical practice in Europe and Canada. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2012;19(2):221–230. doi: 10.1177/1741826711400545.
    1. Reiner Ž., De Backer G., Fras Z., et al. EUROASPIRE Investigators. Lipid lowering drug therapy in patients with coronary heart disease from 24 European countries—findings from the EUROASPIRE IV survey. Atherosclerosis. 2016;246:243–250. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.01.018.
    1. Choudhry N. K., Setoguchi S., Levin R., Winkelmayer W. C., Shrank W. H. Trends in adherence to secondary prevention medications in elderly post-myocardial infarction patients. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 2008;17(12):1189–1196. doi: 10.1002/pds.1671.
    1. Colantonio L. D., Huang L., Monda K. L., et al. Adherence to high-intensity statins following a myocardial infarction hospitalization among medicare beneficiaries. JAMA Cardiology. 2017;2(8):890–895. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0911.
    1. Ferrières J., Rouyer M. V., Lautsch D., et al. Improvement in achievement of lipid targets in France: comparison of data from coronary patients in the DYSIS and DYSIS II studies. International Journal of Cardiology. 2016;222:793–794. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.084.
    1. Colantonio L. D., Rosenson R. S., Deng L., et al. Adherence to statin therapy among US adults between 2007 and 2014. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2019;8(1):p. e010376. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010376.
    1. Rosenson R. S., Farkouh M. E., Mefford M., et al. Trends in use of high-intensity statin therapy after myocardial infarction, 2011 to 2014. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;69(22):2696–2706. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.585.
    1. Lloyd-Jones D. M., Morris P. B., Ballantyne C. M., et al. 2016 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on the role of nonstatin therapies for LDL-cholesterol lowering in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: a report of the American college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016;68(1):92–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.519.
    1. Gencer B., Koskinas K. C., Räber L., et al. Eligibility for PCSK9 inhibitors according to American College of Cardiology (ACC) and European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines after acute coronary syndromes. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017;6(11):p. e006537. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006537.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner