Effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for plantar heel pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Matthew P Cotchett, Karl B Landorf, Shannon E Munteanu, Anita Raspovic, Matthew P Cotchett, Karl B Landorf, Shannon E Munteanu, Anita Raspovic

Abstract

Background: Plantar heel pain (plantar fasciitis) is a common and disabling condition, which has a detrimental impact on health-related quality of life. Despite the high prevalence of plantar heel pain, the optimal treatment for this disorder remains unclear. Consequently, an alternative therapy such as dry needling is increasingly being used as an adjunctive treatment by health practitioners. Only two trials have investigated the effectiveness of dry needling for plantar heel pain, however both trials were of a low methodological quality. This manuscript describes the design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling for plantar heel pain.

Methods: Eighty community-dwelling men and woman aged over 18 years with plantar heel pain (who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria) will be recruited. Eligible participants with plantar heel pain will be randomised to receive either one of two interventions, (i) real dry needling or (ii) sham dry needling. The protocol (including needling details and treatment regimen) was formulated by general consensus (using the Delphi research method) using 30 experts worldwide that commonly use dry needling for plantar heel pain. Primary outcome measures will be the pain subscale of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire and "first step" pain as measured on a visual analogue scale. The secondary outcome measures will be health related quality of life (assessed using the Short Form-36 questionnaire - Version Two) and depression, anxiety and stress (assessed using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - short version). Primary outcome measures will be performed at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks and secondary outcome measures will be performed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. Data will be analysed using the intention to treat principle.

Conclusion: This study is the first randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling for plantar heel pain. The trial will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and the Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture guidelines. The findings from this trial will provide evidence for the effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for plantar heel pain.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand 'Clinical Trials Registry'. ACTRN12610000611022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram.

References

    1. Crawford F. Plantar heel pain and fasciitis. Clin Evid. 2005;13:1533–1545.
    1. Riddle DL, Schappert SM. Volume of ambulatory care visits and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: a national study of medical doctors. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(5):303–310.
    1. Tong KB, Furia J. Economic burden of plantar fasciitis treatment in the United States. Am J Orthop. 2010;39(5):227–231.
    1. Hill CL, Gill T, Menz HB, Taylor AW. Prevalence and correlates of foot pain in a population-based study: the North West Adelaide health study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-1-2.
    1. Dunn JE, Link CL, Felson DT, Crincoli MG, Keysor JJ, McKinlay JB. Prevalence of Foot and Ankle Conditions in a Multiethnic Community Sample of Older Adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:491–498. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh071.
    1. Clement DB, Taunton JE, Smart GW, McNicol KL. A survey of overuse running injuries. Phys Sportsmed. 1981;9:47–58.
    1. Irving DB, Cook JL, Young MA, Menz HB. Impact of chronic plantar heel pain on health-related quality of life. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008;98(4):283–289.
    1. McPoil TG, Martin RL, Cornwall MW, Wukich DK, Irrgang JJ, Godges JJ. Heel pain-plantar fasciitis: clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of function, disability, and health from the orthopaedic section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(4):A1–A18.
    1. Landorf KB, Menz HB. Plantar heel pain and fasciitis. Clin Evid. 2008;02(1111):1–16.
    1. Dommerholt J, Mayoral del Moral O, Grobli C. In: Myofascial Trigger Points: pathophysiology and evidence-informed diagnosis and management. Dommerholt J, Huijbregts P, editor. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2010. Trigger point dry needling; pp. 159–190.
    1. Itoh K, Katsumi Y, Hirota S, Kitakoji H. Randomised trial of trigger point acupuncture compared with other acupuncture for treatment of chronic neck pain. Complement Ther Med. 2007;15(3):172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.05.003.
    1. DiLorenzo L, Traballesi M, Morelli D, Pompa A, Brunelli S, Buzzi MG, Formisano R. Hemiparetic shoulder pain syndrome treated with deep dry needling during early rehabilitation: a prospective, open-label, randomized investigation. J Musculoskel Pain. 2004;12(2):25–34. doi: 10.1300/J094v12n02_04.
    1. Itoh K, Hirota S, Katsumi Y, Ochi H, Kitakoji H. Trigger point acupuncture for treatment of knee osteoarthritis - a preliminary RCT for a pragmatic trial. Acupunct Med. 2008;26(1):17–26. doi: 10.1136/aim.26.1.17.
    1. Huguenin L, Brukner PD, McCrory P, Smith P, Wajswelner H, Bennell K. Effect of dry needling of gluteal muscles on straight leg raise: a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind trial. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(2):84–90. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.009431.
    1. Furlan AD, van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Tsukayama H, Lao L, Koes BW, Berman BM. Acupuncture and dry needling for low back pain: an updated systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane collaboration. Spine. 2005;30(8):944–963. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158941.21571.01.
    1. Itoh K, Katsumi Y, Hirota S, Kitakoji H. Effects of trigger point acupuncture on chronic low back pain in elderly patients - a sham-controlled randomised trial. Acupunct Med. 2006;24(1):5–12. doi: 10.1136/aim.24.1.5.
    1. Itoh K, Katsumi Y, Kitakoji H. Trigger point acupuncture treatment of chronic low back pain in elderly patients - a blinded RCT. Acupunct Med. 2004;22(4):170–177. doi: 10.1136/aim.22.4.170.
    1. Tillu A, Gupta S. Effect of acupuncture treatment on heel pain due to plantar fasciitis. Acupunct Med. 1998;16(2):66–68. doi: 10.1136/aim.16.2.66.
    1. Perez-Millan R, Foster L. Low frequency electroacupuncture in the management of refractory plantar fasciitis. Med Acupunct. 2001;13(1):1–6.
    1. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377–384. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.6.377.
    1. Cotchett MP, Landorf KB, Munteanu SE, Raspovic AM. Effectiveness of dry needling and injections of myofascial trigger points associated with plantar heel pain: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:18. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-18.
    1. Godlee F. Publishing study protocols: making them visible will improve registration, reporting and recruitment. BMC News and Views. 2001;2
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:834–840. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.005.
    1. MacPherson H, White A, Cummings M, Jobst K, Rose K, Niemtzow R. Standards for reporting interventions in clinical trials of acupuncture: The STRICTA recommendations. Acupunct Med. 2002;20(1):22–25. doi: 10.1136/aim.20.1.22.
    1. Radford JA, Landorf KB, Buchbinder R, Cook C. Effectiveness of calf muscle stretching for the short term treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomised trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-36. (36)
    1. Munteanu SE, Menz HB, Zammit GZ, Landorf KB, Handley CJ, ElZarka A, DeLuca J. Efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronan (Synvisc™) for the treatment of osteoarthritis affecting the first metatarsophalangeal joint of the foot (hallux limitus): study protocol for a randomised placebo controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009;2:2. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-2.
    1. McLeod Roberts J. In: Assessment of the lower limb. Second. Merriman LM, Turner W, editor. Edinburgh: Elsevier: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. Vascular assessment; pp. 79–112. full_text.
    1. Tough EA, White AR, Richards SH, Lord B, Campbell JL. Developing and validating a sham acupuncture needle. Acupunct Med. 2009;27:118–122. doi: 10.1136/aim.2009.000737.
    1. Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS. Lower half of the body. 2. Vol. 1. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1999. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual.
    1. Dommerholt J, Mayoral del Moral O, Grobli C. In: Myofascial Trigger Points: pathophysiology and evidence-informed diagnosis and management. Dommerholt J, Huijbregts P, editor. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2010. Myofascial trigger points: an evidence-informed review; pp. 17–50.
    1. Silbernagel KG, Thomeé R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J. Continued sports activity, using a pain-monitoring model, during rehabilitation in patients with Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(6):897–906. doi: 10.1177/0363546506298279.
    1. Thomee R. A comprehensive treatment approach for patellofemoral pain syndrome in young women. Phys Ther. 1997;77(12):1690–1703.
    1. Munteanu SE, Landorf KB, Menz HB, Cook JL, Pizzari T, Scott LA. Efficacy of customised foot orthoses in the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009;2:27. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-27.
    1. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, Fortmann SP, Rogers T, Blair SN, Paffenbarger RSJ. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121(1):91–106.
    1. Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: the Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech. 2006;21(1):89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.002.
    1. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998;88(9):419–428.
    1. Landorf KB, Keenan AM, Herbert RD. Effectiveness of foot orthoses to treat plantar fasciitis. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1305–1310. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.12.1305.
    1. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17(1):45–56. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4.
    1. Reville SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976;31:1191–1198. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x.
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
    1. McHorney CA, Ware JEJ, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31(3):247–263. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006.
    1. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE, Lu JF. The validity and relative precision of MOS short - and long-form Health Status Scales and Dartmouth COOP Charts: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1992;30(5 suppl):MS253–265. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00025.
    1. Brown TA, Korotitsch W, Chorpita BF, Barlow DH. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behav Res Ther. 1997;35(1):79–89. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00068-X.
    1. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression, Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;4:227–239. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657.
    1. Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95)
    1. Collins N, Crossley K, Beller E, Darnell R, McPoil T, Vicenzino B. Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med. 2008;43(3):169–171.
    1. Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. The Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000;31:73–86. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7916(00)00012-4.
    1. Smeets RJ, Beelen S, Goossens ME, Schouten EG, Knottnerus JA, Vlaeyen JW. Treatment expectancy and credibility are associated with the outcome of both physical and cognitive-behavioral treatment in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(4):305–315. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318164aa75.
    1. Landorf KB, Radford JA, Hudson S. Minimal Important Difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;14(3):7. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-7.
    1. Menz HB. Analysis of paired data in physical therapy research: time to stop double-dipping? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(8):477–478.
    1. Gibaldi M, Sullivan S. Intention-to-treat analysis in randomized trials: who gets counted? J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;37:667.
    1. Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 5. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
    1. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. Br Med J. 2001;323:1123–1124. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123.
    1. Hopwood V, Lewith G. Acupuncture trials and methodological considerations. Clin Acupunct Orient Med. 2003;3:192–199. doi: 10.1016/S1461-1449(02)00042-7.
    1. Torgerson DJ, Klaber-Moffett J, Russell IT. Patient preferences in randomised trials: threat or opportunity? J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996;1:194–197.
    1. Rha DW, Im SH, Lee SC, Kim SK. Needle insertion into the tibialis posterior: ultrasonographic evaluation of an anterior approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):283–287. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.024.
    1. Yang SM, Lee SH, Kwon HK. Needle electrode insertion into the tibialis posterior; a comparison of the anterior and posterior approaches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1816–1818. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.027.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner