Impact of Canagliflozin Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life among People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes from Randomized Controlled Trials

Jennifer Cai, Linda M Delahanty, Sydney Akapame, April Slee, Shana Traina, Jennifer Cai, Linda M Delahanty, Sydney Akapame, April Slee, Shana Traina

Abstract

Background: Evidence from patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials may explain health-related behaviors observed in the real world.

Objective: The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the effect of treatment with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, compared with placebo or sitagliptin on health-related quality-of-life outcomes in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus from the clinical development program.

Methods: Patient-reported outcomes data from four randomized controlled trials of canagliflozin (n = 2536) were pooled and analyzed to evaluate participants' interest in continuing study medication; satisfaction with weight; and physical, mental, and emotional health after 26-52 weeks of treatment with canagliflozin vs. placebo or sitagliptin.

Results: Upon trial completion, participants treated with canagliflozin were more likely to express interest in continuing study medication than participants treated with placebo or sitagliptin [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.54 (1.19-1.99); p = 0.001]. Those treated with canagliflozin were also more likely to be satisfied with their weight and report favorable outcomes (score improvement or maintenance of good scores) related to physical and emotional health.

Conclusions: The results of this pooled analysis suggest that people with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with canagliflozin generally had positive experiences with treatment and improvements in health-related quality of life. Future research is needed to determine if these improvements result in improved type 2 diabetes mellitus management and treatment adherence. CLINICALTRIALS.

Gov identifiers: NCT01106625, NCT01106677, NCT01137812, NCT02025907.

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

This analysis was supported by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC and Janssen Global Services, LLC, using data from studies funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Canagliflozin has been developed by Janssen Research & Development, LLC, in collaboration with Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.

Conflict of interest

Jennifer Cai is a full-time employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Linda M. Delahanty is a consultant for Janssen Global Services, LLC. Sydney Akapame and April Slee are full-time employees of Axio Research, and they received payment from Janssen for statistical support of the analyses reported in this manuscript. Shana Traina is a full-time employee of Janssen Global Services, LLC.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for the studies on which these analyses are based.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proportion of participants with favorable outcomes of patient-reported outcome measures at week 26.aCHES-Q Current Health Satisfaction Questionnaire, CI confidence interval, IWQoL-Lite Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite, MCS mental component summary score, OR odds ratio, PCS physical component summary score, SF-36 Short Form-36. aFavorable outcomes are defined as maintaining high baseline scores through the follow-up period or improvement at follow-up for participants with lower baseline scores (refer to Table 1 for more details)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change from baseline in patient-reported outcomes related to (a) weight and (b) physical and mental/emotional satisfaction. CHES-Q Current Health Satisfaction Questionnaire, CI confidence interval, IWQoL-Lite Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite, LSM least squares mean, MCS mental component summary score, PCS physical component summary score, SF-36 Short Form-36

References

    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140–149. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2441.
    1. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):759–769. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759.
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl. 1):S1–S135.
    1. Traina S, Slee A. Demystifying, “patient-centered” care in type 2 diabetes: the role of systematic measurement. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(Special Issue 4):SP135–SP136.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Public workshop: diabetes outcome measures beyond hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). . Accessed 21 Nov 2017.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims; 2009. . Accessed 21 Nov 2017.
    1. Traina SB, Slee A, Woo S, Canovatchel W. The importance of weight change experiences for performance of diabetes self-care: a patient-centered approach to evaluating clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2015;6(4):611–625. doi: 10.1007/s13300-015-0145-8.
    1. Trikkalinou A, Papazafiropoulou AK, Melidonis A. Type 2 diabetes and quality of life. World J Diabetes. 2017;8(4):120–129. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i4.120.
    1. Correa K, Gouvea GR, Silva MA, Possobon RF, Barbosa LF, Pereira AC, et al. Quality of life and characteristics of diabetic patients. Cien Saude Colet. 2017;22(3):921–930. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017223.24452015.
    1. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4 Pt 1):1005–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x.
    1. Rosenthal N, Meininger G, Ways K, Polidori D, Desai M, Qiu R, et al. Canagliflozin: a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2015;1358(1):28–43. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12852.
    1. Thayer S, Aguilar R, Korrer S, Chow W. HbA1c outcomes in patients treated with canagliflozin versus sitagliptin in US health plans. Clin Ther. 2017;39(10):2061–2072. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.019.
    1. Thayer S, Chow W, Korrer S, Aguilar R. Real-world evaluation of glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with canagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(6):1087–1096. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1159954.
    1. Lavalle-González FJ, Januszewicz A, Davidson J, Tong C, Qiu R, Canovatchel W, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2013;56(12):2582–2592. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-3039-1.
    1. Wilding JP, Charpentier G, Hollander P, Gonzalez-Galvez G, Mathieu C, Vercruysse F, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea: a randomised trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(12):1267–1282. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12322.
    1. Schernthaner G, Gross JL, Rosenstock J, Guarisco M, Fu M, Yee J, et al. Canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week, randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2508–2515. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2491.
    1. Rodbard HW, Seufert J, Aggarwal N, Cao A, Fung A, Pfeifer M, et al. Efficacy and safety of titrated canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin and sitagliptin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(8):812–819. doi: 10.1111/dom.12684.
    1. Cefalu WT, Leiter LA, Yoon KH, Arias P, Niskanen L, Xie J, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52 week results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9896):941–950. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60683-2.
    1. Traina S, Guthrie R, Slee A. The impact of weight loss on weight-related quality of life and health satisfaction: results from a trial comparing canagliflozin with sitagliptin in triple therapy among people with type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med. 2014;126(3):7–15. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.05.2752.
    1. Traina SB, Colwell HH, Crosby RD, Mathias SD. Pragmatic measurement of health satisfaction in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus using the Current Health Satisfaction Questionnaire. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:103–115. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S79368.
    1. Traina SB, McQuarrie K, Barrett A, DiBenedetti D, McLeod L. Content validity of the Current Health Satisfaction Questionnaire (CHES-Q) among people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and comorbid chronic kidney disease (CKD) Value Health. 2015;18(7):A710–A711. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2675.
    1. Janssen Global Services LLC. Current Health Satisfaction Questionnaire (CHES-Q): scoring documentation. 2015.
    1. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, Williams GR. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9(2):102–111. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.13.
    1. Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. An integrated method to determine meaningful changes in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(11):1153–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.004.
    1. Bjorner JB, Lyng Wolden M, Gundgaard J, Miller KA. Benchmarks for interpretation of score differences on the SF-36 health survey for patients with diabetes. Value Health. 2013;16(6):993–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.022.
    1. Jermendy G, Wittmann I, Nagy L, Kiss Z, Rokszin G, Bonyi-Toth Z, et al. Persistence of initial oral antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(2):CR72–CR77. doi: 10.12659/MSM.882459.
    1. American Association of Diabetes. Educators position statement. AADE7 self-care behaviors. 2014.
    1. Iglay K, Cartier SE, Rosen VM, Zarotsky V, Rajpathak SN, Radican L, et al. Meta-analysis of studies examining medication adherence, persistence, and discontinuation of oral antihyperglycemic agents in type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(7):1283–1296. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1053048.
    1. Hernandez-Tejada MA, Campbell JA, Walker RJ, Smalls BL, Davis KS, Egede LE. Diabetes empowerment, medication adherence and self-care behaviors in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(7):630–634. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0287.
    1. Cai J, Wang Y, Baser O, Xie L, Chow W. Comparative persistence and adherence with newer anti-hyperglycemic agents to treat patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States. J Med Econ. 2016;19(12):1175–1186. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1208208.
    1. Williamson DA, Rejeski J, Lang W, Van Dorsten B, Fabricatore AN, Toledo K, et al. Impact of a weight management program on health-related quality of life in overweight adults with type 2 diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):163–171. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.544.
    1. Rubin RR, Wadden TA, Bahnson JL, Blackburn GL, Brancati FL, Bray GA, et al. Impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on depression and health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes: the Look AHEAD Trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1544–1553. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1928.
    1. Florez H, Pan Q, Ackermann RT, Marrero DG, Barrett-Connor E, Delahanty L, et al. Impact of lifestyle intervention and metformin on health-related quality of life: the diabetes prevention program randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(12):1594–1601. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2122-5.
    1. Ali MK, Echouffo-Tcheugui J, Williamson DF. How effective were lifestyle interventions in real-world settings that were modeled on the Diabetes Prevention Program? Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(1):67–75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1009.
    1. Maruish ME. User’s manual for the SF-36v2 health survey. 3. Lincoln: QualityMetric, Inc.; 2011.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner