Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with reverse PHILOS plate and medial cannulated screws with lateral approach

Jian Fan, X Zhang, Y Luo, G W You, W K Ng, Y F Yang, Jian Fan, X Zhang, Y Luo, G W You, W K Ng, Y F Yang

Abstract

Background: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is most common and effective surgical treatment for severe hindfoot pathology, but the fusion rate is often lower than the ordinary tibiotalar arthrodesis because of the more serious joint disease associated with obvious deformity and osteoporosis. Recent literature describe tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with reverse PHILOS plate with good clinical outcome result, though some patients non-union, due to eccentric force of the plate may be hidden. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome of the lateral approach for tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with reverse PHILOS Plate and medial cannulated screw.

Methods: Between Jun, 2013 to April, 2015 12 patient with hindfoot pathology had TTC arthrodesis with a reverse PHILOS plate with medial cannulated screw through a lateral approach with resection of the distal fibula and bone graft. Perioperatively observe for wound and neurovascular status. Patients were follow-up from post-operative 1, 3, 6 and12 months, to observation of wound healing, ankle pain, subtalar Joint Fusion, internal fixation and ankle function. Ankle function were scored according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale system.

Results: Twelve ankle fusion all patient follow-up, with mean time to surgery 18.6 months (12-36 month). No cases infection and issue necrosis; one patient complaint of lateral foot numbness we observe and follow-up was spontaneously recovery after 3 months. After 3 months of operation, no obvious pain of ankle joint and internal fixations loose were found. Almost fusion and good axial alignment of TTC joint also were found by X-ray and CT examination. After final fellow-up of each case, no case complain of pain of ankle joint, good fusion and axial alignment of TTC joint were also all found through Terminology. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle society (AOFAS) score average was 77.5.

Conclusion: TTC arthrodesis with reverse PHILOS Plate and medial cannulated screw have advantages of clear incision, effective bone orthopaedic and graft fully secure, stable internal fixation, high fusion rate and less complications, can effectively correct deformities, alleviate hindfoot pain and improve function, and is an effective method of treatment of after severe hindfoot disease.

Trial registration: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with reference number: ID: NCT02977910 . Registered 26 Nov 2016, retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Arthrodesis; Cannulated screws; Lateral approach; Reverse PHILOS plate; Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC).

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval of and consent has been obtained from Ethics Committee of Shanghai Tongji hospital. All participants have given their informed consent to this study.

Consent for publication

All surgical images and data included in this paper have obtained informed consents from related participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The male case, 57 years old, with left talus necrosis after internal fixation of fracture and dislocation, was treated with TTCA. a Preoperative CT showed avasculanecrosis of talus dislocation with old fracture and internal fixation. b Through the lateral incision, tibiotalar and subtalar joint were exposed after fibular was cut 7-8 cm above the distal fibula. c Postoperative X-ray. d X-ray 12 months after operation. e Left ankle shows obvious inversion deformity before operation. f Left ankle shows nearly normal 12 months after operation

References

    1. Kim BS, Knupp M, Zwicky L, et al. Total ankle replocement in as-satiation with hindfoot fusion:outcome and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1540–1547. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B11.24452.
    1. Burks JB. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2012;29(4):529–545. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2012.08.002.
    1. Chiodo CP, Acevedo JI, Sammarco VJ, Parks BG, Boucher HR, Myerson MS, Schon LC. Intramedullary rod fixation compared with blade-plate and screw fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(12):2425–8.
    1. Bennett GL, Cameron B, Njus G, Saunders M, Kay DB. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical assessment of stability. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(7):530–536. doi: 10.1177/107110070502600706.
    1. Quill G. Tibiotalocalcaneal and pantalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin. 1996;1:199–209.
    1. Zhang C, Shi Z, Mei G. Locking plate versus retrograde intramedullary nail fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: A retrospective analysis. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(2):227–32.
    1. Berend ME, Glisson RR, Nunley JA. A biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and crossed lag screw fixation for tibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(10):639–643. doi: 10.1177/107110079701801007.
    1. Peterson KS, Chapman WD, Hyer CF, Berlet GC. Short-term radiographic results and technique of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with a posterior anatomic locking plate. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;19:S1067.
    1. Franceschi F, Franceschetti E, Torre G1, Papalia R, Samuelsson K, Karlsson J, Denaro V. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1316–1325. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3548-1.
    1. Fang Z, Claaßen L, Windhagen H, Daniilidis K, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Waizy H. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail with a valgus curve. Orthop Surg. 2015;7(2):125–131. doi: 10.1111/os.12171.
    1. Gorman TM, Beals TC, Nickisch F, Saltzman CL, Lyman M, Barg A. Hindfoot Arthrodesis with the blade plate: increased risk of complications and nonunion in a complex patient population. Clin Orthop Relat res. 2016 Jul 5. [Epub ahead of print]12Ahmad J,Pour AE,Rsikin SM.The modified Dse of aproximaI humeral locking plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arlhrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:977–983. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0977.
    1. Ahmad J, Pour AE, Rsikin SM. The modified Dse of aproximaI humeral locking plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arlhrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:977–983. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0977.
    1. Shearman AD, Eleftheriou KI, Patel A, Pradhan R, Rosenfeld PF. Use of a proximal humeral locking plate for complex ankle and Hindfoot fusion. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(3):612–618. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.004.
    1. Özer D, Bayhan Aİ, Keskin A, Sarı S, Kaygusuz MA. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis by using proximal humeral locking plate. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(4):389–392. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.06.001.
    1. Baumhauer JF. Ankle arthrodesis versus ankle replacementfor ankle arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2439–2442. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3084-6.
    1. Deleu PA, Devos Bevernage B, Maldague P, et al. Arthrodesis after failed Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(6):549–557. doi: 10.1177/1071100714536368.
    1. chi Z, wen-qi G, zhong-min S, et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis by lateral malleolus osteotomy and fixation with proximal humeral internal locking system. Chin J Orthop Trauma. 2012, 14(4):309–12.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner