A Comprehensive Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Study on 2,005 Patients

Monica Abghari-Gerst, Wesley R Armstrong, Kathleen Nguyen, Jeremie Calais, Johannes Czernin, David Lin, Namasvi Jariwala, Melissa Rodnick, Thomas A Hope, Jason Hearn, Jeffrey S Montgomery, Ajjai Alva, Zachery R Reichert, Daniel E Spratt, Timothy D Johnson, Peter J H Scott, Morand Piert, Monica Abghari-Gerst, Wesley R Armstrong, Kathleen Nguyen, Jeremie Calais, Johannes Czernin, David Lin, Namasvi Jariwala, Melissa Rodnick, Thomas A Hope, Jason Hearn, Jeffrey S Montgomery, Ajjai Alva, Zachery R Reichert, Daniel E Spratt, Timothy D Johnson, Peter J H Scott, Morand Piert

Abstract

We prospectively investigated the performance of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand 68Ga-PSMA-11 for detecting prostate adenocarcinoma in patients with elevated levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after initial therapy. Methods:68Ga-PSMA-11 hybrid PET was performed on 2,005 patients at the time of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) (50.8%), definitive radiation therapy (RT) (19.7%), or RP with postoperative RT (PORT) (29.6%). The presence of prostate cancer was assessed qualitatively (detection rate = positivity rate) and quantitatively on a per-patient and per-region basis, creating a disease burden estimate from the presence or absence of local (prostate/prostate bed), nodal (N1: pelvis), and distant metastatic (M1: distant soft tissue and bone) disease. The primary study endpoint was the positive predictive value (PPV) of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT confirmed by histopathology. Results: After RP, the scan detection rate increased significantly with rising PSA level (44.8% at PSA < 0.25%-96.2% at PSA > 10 ng/mL; P < 0.001). The detection rate significantly increased with rising PSA level in each individual region, overall disease burden, prior androgen deprivation, clinical T-stage, and Gleason grading from the RP specimen (P < 0.001). After RT, the detection rate for in-gland prostate recurrence was 64.0%, compared with 20.6% prostate bed recurrence after RP and 13.3% after PORT. PSMA-positive pelvic nodal disease was detected in 42.7% after RP, 40.8% after PORT, and 38.8% after RT. In patients with histopathologic validation, the PPV per patient was 0.82 (146/179). The SUVmax of histologically proven true-positive lesions was significantly higher than that of false-positive lesions (median, 11.0 [interquartile range, 6.3-22.2] vs. 5.1 [interquartile range, 2.2-7.4]; P < 0.001). Conclusion: We confirmed a high PPV for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in biochemical recurrence and the PSA level as the main predictor of scan positivity.

Keywords: PSMA; disease pattern; hybrid PET; prostate cancer; prostate-specific membrane antigen.

© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Schematic of identified PSMA-positive lesion locations.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Cumulative total scan positivity rate (relative to entire population in treatment groups RP [n = 1,018], RP and PORT [n = 593], or definitive RT [n = 394]). Percentage of individual PSMA-positive disease locations as listed in Figure 1 and cumulative locoregional and distant disease positivity rates are from PSMA scans rated positive (RP, n = 678; PORT, n = 485; RT, n = 376).

References

    1. Van den Broeck T, van den Bergh RCN, Arfi N, et al. . Prognostic value of biochemical recurrence following treatment with curative intent for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2019;75:967–987.
    1. Shipley WU, Seiferheld W, Lukka HR, et al. . Radiation with or without antiandrogen therapy in recurrent prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:417–428.
    1. Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, et al. . Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline. Part I: risk stratification, Shared decision making, and care options. J Urol. 2018;199:683–690.
    1. Calais J, Fendler WP, Eiber M, et al. . Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on the management of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:434–441.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, Holland-Letz T, Giesel FL, et al. . Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1258–1268.
    1. Perera M, Papa N, Christidis D, et al. . Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of positive 68Ga–prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70:926–937.
    1. Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, et al. . Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:856–863.
    1. Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, et al. . 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1014–1024.
    1. Jackson IM, Lee SJ, Sowa AR, et al. . Use of 55 PET radiotracers under approval of a Radioactive Drug Research Committee (RDRC). EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2020;5:24–40.
    1. Rodnick ME, Sollert C, Stark D, et al. . Cyclotron-based production of 68Ga, [68Ga]GaCl3, and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 from a liquid target. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2020;5:25.
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A, da Cunha ML, Wagner J, et al. . Performance of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy: a multi-centre evaluation of 2533 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2925–2934.
    1. Tan N, Bavadian N, Calais J, et al. . Imaging of prostate specific membrane antigen targeted radiotracers for the detection of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2019;202:231–240.
    1. Morris MJ, Rowe SP, Gorin MA, et al. . Diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: results from the CONDOR phase III, multicenter study. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3674–3682.
    1. Hope TA, Goodman JZ, Allen IE, Calais J, Fendler WP, Carroll PR. Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy for the detection of prostate cancer validated by histopathology. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:786–793.
    1. Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, et al. . False positive PSMA PET for tumor remnants in the irradiated prostate and other interpretation pitfalls in a prospective multi-center trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:501–508.
    1. Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, et al. . Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395:1208–1216.
    1. Ceci F, Castellucci P, Graziani T, et al. . 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer: efficacy in different clinical stages of PSA failure after radical therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:31–39.
    1. Tendulkar RD, Agrawal S, Gao T, et al. . Contemporary update of a multi-institutional predictive nomogram for salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3648–3654.
    1. Abugharib A, Jackson WC, Tumati V, et al. . Very early salvage radiotherapy improves distant metastasis-free survival. J Urol. 2017;197:662–668.
    1. Dess RT, Sun Y, Jackson WC, et al. . Association of presalvage radiotherapy PSA levels after prostatectomy with outcomes of long-term antiandrogen therapy in men with prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:735–743.
    1. Rowe SP, Macura KJ, Mena E, et al. . PSMA-based [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging for lesion detection in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2016;18:411–419.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner