A comparative study of three conservative treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: lumbar spinal stenosis with acupuncture and physical therapy study (LAP study)

Hiroyuki Oka, Ko Matsudaira, Yuichi Takano, Daichi Kasuya, Masaki Niiya, Juichi Tonosu, Masayoshi Fukushima, Yasushi Oshima, Tomoko Fujii, Sakae Tanaka, Hirohiko Inanami, Hiroyuki Oka, Ko Matsudaira, Yuichi Takano, Daichi Kasuya, Masaki Niiya, Juichi Tonosu, Masayoshi Fukushima, Yasushi Oshima, Tomoko Fujii, Sakae Tanaka, Hirohiko Inanami

Abstract

Background: Although the efficiency of conservative management for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has been examined, different conservative management approaches have not been compared. We have performed the first comparative trial of three types of conservative management (medication with acetaminophen, exercise, and acupuncture) in Japanese patients with LSS.

Methods: Patients with L5 root radiculopathy associated with LSS who visited our hospital for surgical treatment were enrolled between December 2011 and January 2014. In this open-label study, patients were assigned to three treatment groups (medication, exercise, acupuncture) according to the visit time. The primary outcomes were Zurich claudication questionnaire (ZCQ) scores before and after 4 weeks of treatment. Least square mean analysis was used to assess the following dependent variables in the treatment groups: changes in symptom severity and physical function scores of the ZCQ and the ZCQ score of patient's satisfaction after treatment.

Results: Thirty-eight, 40, and 41 patients were allocated to the medication, exercise, and acupuncture groups, respectively. No patient underwent surgical treatment during the study period. The symptom severity scores of the ZCQ improved significantly after treatment in the medication (p = 0.048), exercise (p = 0.003), and acupuncture (p = 0.04) groups. The physical function score improved significantly in the acupuncture group (p = 0.045) but not in the medication (p = 0.20) and exercise (p = 0.29) groups. The mean reduction in the ZCQ score for physical function was significantly greater for acupuncture than for exercise. The mean ZCQ score for treatment satisfaction was significantly greater for acupuncture than for medication.

Conclusions: Acupuncture was significantly more effective than physical exercise according to the physical function score of the ZCQ and than medication according to the satisfaction score. The present study provides new important information that will aid decision making in LSS treatment.

Trial registration: This study was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ( UMIN000006957 ).

Keywords: Acupuncture; Conservative management; Exercise; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Medication; Zurich claudication questionnaire.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the medical/ethics review board of Iwai Orthopaedic Medical Hospital (H23–010). Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schema of the exercise. a: Lie on your back and put your feet on the chair so that the hip joint and knee are at right angles. b: Holding your breath while holding down the knees, slowly count five. On the way, if you get tired, put your feet on the chair and rest
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of participants in LAP study

References

    1. Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:818–825. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0708097.
    1. Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Yamada H, Nagata K, Hashizume H, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama spine study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2012;20:1103–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.018.
    1. Yuan PS, Booth RE, Jr, Albert TJ. Nonsurgical and surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:303–312.
    1. Onda A, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, Otani K, Nikaido T, Watanabe K, et al. Limaprost alfadex and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for sciatica due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:794–801. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2551-1.
    1. Matsudaira K, Seichi A, Kunogi J, Yamazaki T, Kobayashi A, Anamizu Y, et al. The efficacy of prostaglandin E1 derivative in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2009;34:115–120. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818f924d.
    1. Orita S, Yamashita M, Eguchi Y, Suzuki M, Inoue G, Miyagi M, et al. Pregabalin for refractory Radicular leg pain due to lumbar spinal Stenosis: a preliminary prospective study. Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:5079675. doi: 10.1155/2016/5079675.
    1. Lewis SC, Langman MJ, Laporte JR, Matthews JN, Rawlins MD, Wiholm BE. Dose-response relationships between individual nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) and serious upper gastrinstestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;54:320–326. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01636.x.
    1. Koppert W, Wehrfritz A, Körber N, Sittl R, Albrecht S, Schüttler J, et al. The cyclooxygenase isozyme inhibitors parecoxib and paracetamol reduce central hyperalgesia in humans. Pain. 2004;108:148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.017.
    1. Jarrett MS, Orlando JF, Grimmer-Somers K. The effectiveness of land based exercise compared to decompressive surgery in the management of lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-30.
    1. Inoue M, Nakajima M, Hojo T, Kitakoji H, Itoi M. Spinal nerve root electroacupunctuure for symptomatic treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis unresponsive to standard acupuncture :a prospective case series. Acupunct Med. 2012;30:103–108. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2011-010122.
    1. Jenis L, An H. Spine update: lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine. 2000;25:389–394. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022.
    1. Verbiest H. A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954;36-B:230–237.
    1. Kasuya D. Acupuncture and moxibustion therapy for lower back leg pain - lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Pain Clinic. 2011;32:519–528.
    1. Stucki G, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:796–803. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199604010-00004.
    1. Hara N, Matsudaira K, Masuda K, Tohnosu J, Takeshita K, Kobayashi A, et al. Psychometric assessment of the Japanese version of the Zurich claudication questionnaire (ZCQ): reliability and validity. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160183.
    1. Benyamin RM, Staats PS, MiDAS EI. MILDR is an effective treatment for lumbar spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE randomized controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2016;19:229–242.
    1. American Geriatrics Society Panel on Pharmacological Management of Persistent Pain in Older Persons Pharmacological management of persistent pain in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1331–1346. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02376.x.
    1. Kurata K, Hotta T, Ito S, Sato S, Hayashi K, Seki T, et al. Clinical effect of neurotropin(R) tablet for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Shinyaku to Rinsho. 1992;41:2291–2301.
    1. DeWell C, Macdonald G, Webster GD, Masten CL, Baumeister RF, Powell C, et al. Acetaminophen reduces social pain: behavioral and neural evidence. Psychol Sci. 2010;21:931–937. doi: 10.1177/0956797610374741.
    1. Randles D, Heine SJ, Santos N. The common pain of surrealism and death: acetaminophen reduces compensatory affirmation following meaning threats. Psychol Sci. 2013;24:966–973. doi: 10.1177/0956797612464786.
    1. Konno S. Epidemiological study on lumbar spinal canal stenosis. J New Rem & Clin. 2010;59:55–68.
    1. Ogawa S. The concept of pain. The Bone. 2013;27:21–25.
    1. The Japan Orthopedic Surgery Society. Japan Spinal. Spinal Cord Society Association Clinical Guidelines - Lumbar spinal stenosis 2011. Nankodo. 2011;2011:36–37.
    1. Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Childs JD, Wainner RS, Gill HE, Ryder MG, et al. A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2006;31:2541–2549. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000241136.98159.8c.
    1. Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Kotevoglu N, Kuran B. The efficacy of physical therapy and physical therapy plus calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50:683–688. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.683.
    1. Iggo A, Kornhuber HH. A quantitative study of C-mechanorecoptors in hairy skin of the cat. J Physiol. 1977;271:549–565. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012014.
    1. Kim KH, Kim TH, Lee BR, Kim JK, Son DW, Lee SW, et al. Acupuncture for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2013;21:535–556. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.08.007.
    1. Kim TH, Ku B, Bae JH, Shin JY, Jun MH, Kang JW, et al. Hemodynamic changes caused by acupuncture in healthy volunteers: a prospective, single-arm exploratory clinical study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017;17:274. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1787-z.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner