Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: an FMRI study of jazz improvisation

Charles J Limb, Allen R Braun, Charles J Limb, Allen R Braun

Abstract

To investigate the neural substrates that underlie spontaneous musical performance, we examined improvisation in professional jazz pianists using functional MRI. By employing two paradigms that differed widely in musical complexity, we found that improvisation (compared to production of over-learned musical sequences) was consistently characterized by a dissociated pattern of activity in the prefrontal cortex: extensive deactivation of dorsolateral prefrontal and lateral orbital regions with focal activation of the medial prefrontal (frontal polar) cortex. Such a pattern may reflect a combination of psychological processes required for spontaneous improvisation, in which internally motivated, stimulus-independent behaviors unfold in the absence of central processes that typically mediate self-monitoring and conscious volitional control of ongoing performance. Changes in prefrontal activity during improvisation were accompanied by widespread activation of neocortical sensorimotor areas (that mediate the organization and execution of musical performance) as well as deactivation of limbic structures (that regulate motivation and emotional tone). This distributed neural pattern may provide a cognitive context that enables the emergence of spontaneous creative activity.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Low complexity (Scale) and high…
Figure 1. Low complexity (Scale) and high complexity (Jazz) experimental paradigms used to study spontaneous musical creativity.
In the upper portion of the figure, the non-ferromagnetic MIDI piano keyboard that was used during functional MRI scanning is shown. This keyboard had thirty five full-size piano keys which triggered high-quality piano sound samples generated outside of the scanner, which were immediately routed back to the musicians using audiophile quality electrostatic earphone speakers. During scanning, subjects were randomly cued to play either the over-learned control condition or to improvise spontaneously. For Scale's control condition, subjects repeatedly played a one octave ascending and descending C major scale in quarter notes for the duration of the block (ScaleCtrl, upper left). For Scale's improvisation condition, subjects improvised in quarter notes only, selecting all notes from within one octave and from the C major scale notes alone (example shown under ScaleImprov, upper right). For Jazz's control condition, subjects played a novel melody that was memorized prior to scanning (JazzCtrl, lower left). For Jazz's improvisation condition, subjects improvised using the composition's underlying chord structure as the basis for spontaneous creative output (example shown under JazzImprov, lower right). Note that for JazzCtrl and JazzImprov, eighth notes are typically performed with a “swing” feel that is not accurately represented using standard musical notation, in both the control and improvisation conditions. Audio samples of the four musical excerpts shown here are provided in Supporting Information.
Figure 2. Axial slice renderings of mean…
Figure 2. Axial slice renderings of mean activations (red/yellow scale bar) and deactivations (blue/green scale bar) associated with improvisation during Scale and Jazz paradigms.
In both paradigms, spontaneous improvisation was associated with widespread deactivation in prefrontal cortex throughout DLPFC and LOFC, combined with focal activation in MPFC. In addition, increases in sensorimotor activity and decreases in limbic activity were seen in both paradigms. Activations were identified through inclusive masking of the contrast for [Improv–Control] with the contrast for [Improv–Rest], and deactivations were identified through inclusive masking of the contrast for [Control–Improv] with the contrast for [Rest–Improv] for both Scale and Jazz paradigms. The scale bar shows t-score values and the sagittal section shows an anatomical representation of slice location; both scale bar and sagittal slice insets apply equally to Scale and Jazz data. Labels refer to axial slice z-plane in Talairach space.
Figure 3. Three-dimensional surface projection of activations…
Figure 3. Three-dimensional surface projection of activations and deactivations associated with improvisation during the Jazz paradigm.
Medial prefrontal cortex activation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex deactivation, and sensorimotor activation can be seen. The scale bar shows the range of t-scores; the axes demonstrate anatomic orientation. Abbreviations: a, anterior; p, posterior; d, dorsal; v, ventral; R, right; L, left.

References

    1. Blood AJ, Zatorre RJ, Bermudez P, Evans AC. Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regions. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:382–387.
    1. Blood AJ, Zatorre RJ. Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:11818–11823.
    1. Halpern AR, Zatorre RJ. When that tune runs through your head: a PET investigation of auditory imagery for familiar melodies. Cereb Cortex. 1999;9:697–704.
    1. Koelsch S, Fritz T, DY VC, Muller K, Friederici AD. Investigating emotion with music: An fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;27:239–250.
    1. Koelsch S, Gunter TC, v Cramon DY, Zysset S, Lohmann G, et al. Bach speaks: a cortical “language-network” serves the processing of music. Neuroimage. 2002;17:956–966.
    1. Zatorre RJ, Belin P. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2001;11:946–953.
    1. Zatorre RJ, Belin P, Penhune VB. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6:37–46.
    1. Zatorre RJ, Halpern AR. Mental concerts: musical imagery and auditory cortex. Neuron. 2005;47:9–12.
    1. Zatorre RJ, Perry DW, Beckett CA, Westbury CF, Evans AC. Functional anatomy of musical processing in listeners with absolute pitch and relative pitch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:3172–3177.
    1. Ozdemir E, Norton A, Schlaug G. Shared and distinct neural correlates of singing and speaking. Neuroimage. 2006;33:628–635.
    1. Perry DW, Zatorre RJ, Petrides M, Alivisatos B, Meyer E, et al. Localization of cerebral activity during simple singing. Neuroreport. 1999;10:3453–3458.
    1. Parsons LM. Exploring the functional neuroanatomy of music performance, perception, and comprehension. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;930:211–231.
    1. Bengtsson SL, Csikszentmihalyi M, Ullen F. Cortical regions involved in the generation of musical structures during improvisation in pianists. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19:830–842.
    1. Dietrich A. The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004;11:1011–1026.
    1. Dietrich A. Functional neuroanatomy of altered states of consciousness: the transient hypofrontality hypothesis. Conscious Cogn. 2003;12:231–256.
    1. Nisenson E. New York: Da Capo Press; 1995. Ascension: John Coltrane and his quest.
    1. Hentoff N. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press; 2004. American music is. p. xix, 318.
    1. Burgess PW, Alderman N, Forbes C, Costello A, Coates LM, et al. The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12:194–209.
    1. Burgess PW, Alderman N, Evans J, Emslie H, Wilson BA. The ecological validity of tests of executive function. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4:547–558.
    1. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C, Worsley KJ. Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage. 1999;10:385–396.
    1. Braun AR, Guillemin A, Hosey L, Varga M. The neural organization of discourse: an H2 15O-PET study of narrative production in English and American sign language. Brain. 2001;124:2028–2044.
    1. Berliner P. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. Thinking in jazz: the infinite art of improvisation. p. xix, 883.
    1. Goldberg II, Harel M, Malach R. When the brain loses its self: prefrontal inactivation during sensorimotor processing. Neuron. 2006;50:329–339.
    1. Christoff K, Gabrieli JDE. The frontopolar cortex and human cognition: evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization within the human prefrontal cortex. Psychobiology. 2000;28:168–186.
    1. Raichle ME, Gusnard DA. Intrinsic brain activity sets the stage for expression of motivated behavior. J Comp Neurol. 2005;493:167–176.
    1. Ramnani N, Owen AM. Anterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:184–194.
    1. Passingham D, Sakai K. The prefrontal cortex and working memory: physiology and brain imaging. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:163–168.
    1. Sakai K, Passingham RE. Prefrontal interactions reflect future task operations. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:75–81.
    1. Bunge SA, Ochsner KN, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JD. Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind. Brain. 2001;124:2074–2086.
    1. Koechlin E, Basso G, Pietrini P, Panzer S, Grafman J. The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition. Nature. 1999;399:148–151.
    1. Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET. The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Prog Neurobiol. 2004;72:341–372.
    1. Blakemore SJ, Rees G, Frith CD. How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36:521–529.
    1. Ashby FG, Isen AM, Turken AU. A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychol Rev. 1999;106:529–550.
    1. Carlsson ML. On the role of cortical glutamate in obsessive-compulsive disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, two phenomenologically antithetical conditions. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;102:401–413.
    1. Bransford J, Stein BS. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1993. The ideal problem solver: a guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity. p. xiii, 262.
    1. Shirley DA, Langan-Fox J. Intuition: a review of the literature. Psychol Rep. 1996;79:563–584.
    1. Guilford JP. Creativity. Am Psychol. 1950;5:444–454.
    1. Schooler JW, Melcher J. The ineffability of insight. In: Smith SM, Ward TB, Finke RA, editors. The Creative Cognition Approach. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995. pp. 97–133.
    1. Curtis CE, D'Esposito M. Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7:415–423.
    1. Braun AR, Balkin TJ, Wesenten NJ, Carson RE, Varga M, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow throughout the sleep-wake cycle. An H2(15)O PET study. Brain. 1997;120 (Pt 7):1173–1197.
    1. Hobson JA, Pace-Schott EF, Stickgold R. Dreaming and the brain: toward a cognitive neuroscience of conscious states. Behav Brain Sci. 2000;23:793–842. discussion 904–1121.
    1. Koelsch S, Fritz T, Schulze K, Alsop D, Schlaug G. Adults and children processing music: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2005;25:1068–1076.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner